Performance-based probabilistic framework for seismic risk, resilience, and sustainability assessment of reinforced concrete structures

Advances in Structural Engineering - Tập 23 Số 7 - Trang 1454-1472 - 2020
Ghazanfar Ali Anwar1, You Dong1, Changhai Zhai2,3
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
2Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disaster of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
3Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China

Tóm tắt

Recent earthquakes have highlighted additional losses due to the lack of resilience of damaged structures. Environmental impact, as performance indicator, has also received increased attention within performance-based earthquake engineering. In this article, a combined probabilistic framework is proposed to assess seismic risk, sustainability, and resilience of a non-ductile reinforced concrete frame structure. The framework utilizes three-dimensional inelastic fiber-based numerical modeling approach to develop limit states associated with performance levels. The decision variables (i.e. repair cost, downtime, and equivalent carbon emissions) are quantified at both component level and system level and are compared considering seismic risk, sustainability, and resilience. In addition, the proposed approach considers uncertainties in the building performance and consequence functions of structural and non-structural components. Fast-track and slow-track schemes are utilized as a repair strategy and probabilistic resilience is quantified given the investigated time period. The proposed approach can aid the development of the next generation of performance-based engineering incorporating both resilience and sustainability.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399

Almufti I, 2013, REDi™ Rating System: Resilience Based Earthquake Design Initiative for the Next Generation of Buildings

Ambraseys N, 2004, Bollettino di geofisica teorica ed applicata, 45, 113

ASCE, 2013, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings

10.1111/disa.12106

10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000177

10.1201/b19094-47

Brundtland GH, 1987, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: “Our Common Future.”

10.1193/1.1623497

Burton HV, 2015, Journal of Structural Engineering, 142, C4015007, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001321

10.1080/13632469.2016.1149893

10.1371/journal.pone.0090265

10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.001

10.1002/eqe.2682

10.1080/15732479.2016.1198399

10.1002/eqe.2281

10.1086/681129

10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(315)

FEMA, 2012, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: Vol. 1—Methodology

10.1080/15732479.2016.1267772

10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.037

10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.021

10.1007/s11269-016-1245-6

Hutt CM, 2015, Journal of Structural Engineering, 142, C4015005, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001314

10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005

Kishida T, 2018, 11th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering

10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547

10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001019

10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.002

10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.004

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086

10.1061/AJRUA6.0000998

10.1193/1.2192847

10.1177/1369433216667188

10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000723

10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000138

10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.101

10.1080/10286608.2015.1025386

10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.030

10.1260/1369-4332.18.10.1653

10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663

UBC, 1997, Uniform Building Code

10.1002/eqe.141

10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.007

10.1007/s10518-015-9744-z

10.1260/1369-4332.17.4.461

10.1007/s10518-018-0510-x

10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.031