Performance assessment of damaged ship hulls

ABS, 1995 ABS, 2010 Akpan, 2002, Risk assessment of aging ship hull structures in the presence of corrosion and fatigue, Mar. Struct. (Elsevier), 15, 211, 10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00030-2 Decò, 2011, Time-variant redundancy of ship structures, J. Ship Res. (SNAME), 55, 208, 10.5957/jsr.2011.55.3.208 Decò, 2012, Reliability and redundancy assessment of ships under different operational conditions, Eng. Struct. (Elsevier), 42, 457, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.017 Drummen I., Wu M., Moan T. (2009). Experimental and numerical study of containership responses in severe head seas. Mar Struct, 22:172–193. Estes, 1998, RELSYS: a computer program for structural system reliability analysis, Struct. Eng. Mech. (Techno Press), 6, 901, 10.12989/sem.1998.6.8.901 Faltinsen, 1990, 328 Fang, C., Das, P.K., 2004. Hull girder ultimate strength of damaged ships. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and other Floating Structures. Luebeck-Travemuende, Germany, pp. 309–316. Fang, 2005, Survivability and reliability of damaged ships after collision and grounding, Ocean Eng., 32, 293, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.08.006 Frangopol, D.M., 1995. Reliability ­ based optimum structural design, Chapter 16 in Probabilistic Structural Mechanics Handbook, C. Sundararajan, ed., Chapman & Hall, New York, 352–387 Frangopol, 1987, Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability, J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE), 113, 1533, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:7(1533) Frangopol, D.M., and Estes, A.C. (1997). Lifetime bridge maintenance strategies based on system reliability, Structural Engineering International, IABSE, 7 (3), Zurich, Switzerland, 193–198. FREE!ship, 2006. FREE!ship Manual—Version 2.6. Website: 〈www.freeship.org〉. Gordo, 1997, Interaction equation for the collapse of tankers and container ships under combined bending moments, J. Ship Res., 41, 230, 10.5957/jsr.1997.41.3.230 Guedes Soares, 2008, Benchmark study on the use of simplified structural codes to predict the ultimate strength of a damaged ship hull, Int. Shipbuild. Prog., 55, 87 Guedes Soares, 1988, Statistical analysis of still water load effects in ship structures, Trans. Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng. (SNAME), 96, l29 Guedes Soares, 2000, Structural reliability of two bulk carrier designs, Mar. Struct., 13, 107, 10.1016/S0951-8339(00)00004-6 Hørte, T., Wang, G., White, N, 2007. Calibration of the hull girder ultimate capacity criterion for double hull tankers. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Practical Design of Ships and Offshore Structures, Houston, USA, October. Hughes, 1983 Hussein, A.W., Guedes Soares, C., 2008. Partial safety factors assessment for double hull tankers following the new common structural rules. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2008), Paper OMAE2008-57949. Hussein, 2009, Reliability and residual strength of double hull tankers designed according to the new IACS common structural rules, Ocean Eng. (Elsevier), 36, 1446, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.04.006 IACS, 2008 Jia, H., Moan, T., 2008. Reliability analysis of oil tankers with collision damage. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2008), Estoril, Portugal, June 15–20, 2008, Paper no. OMAE2008-57102. Khan, I.A., Das, P.K., 2007. Structural safety assessment of damaged ships. In: Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, San Diego, USA, June 10–15, 2007, Paper no. OMAE2007-29121. Khan, 2008, Reliability analysis of intact and damaged ships considering combined vertical and horizontal bending moments, Ships Offshore Struct., 8, 371, 10.1080/17445300802369950 Korvin-Kroukowski, 1957, Pitching and heaving motions of a ship in regular waves, Transactions (SNAME), 65, 590 Lee, 2012, Global wave loads on a damaged ship, Ships Offshore Struct. (Taylor & Francis), 7, 237, 10.1080/17445302.2011.588081 McKay, 1979, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics (American Statistical Association), 21, 239 Okasha, N.M., and Frangopol, D.M. (2009). Lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of structural maintenance, considering system reliability, redundancy, and life-cycle cost using GA, Structural Safety, Elsevier, 31 (6), 460–474 Okasha, N.M., and Frangopol, D.M. (2010a). “Novel approach for multi-criteria optimization of life-cycle preventive and essential maintenance of deteriorating structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 136(8), 1009-1022. Okasha, 2010, Efficient method based on optimization and simulation for the probabilistic strength computation of the ship hull, J. Ship Res. (SNAME), 54, 1 Onoufriou, T. and Frangopol, D.M. (2002). “Reliability-based inspection optimization of complex structures: a brief retrospective”, Computers & Structures, Pergamon, 80(12), 1133–1144. Paik, 2001, Ship structural safety and reliability, Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. (Wiley and Sons), 3, 198, 10.1002/pse.74 Paik, 1998, Ship hull ultimate strength reliability considering corrosion, J. Ship Res. (SNAME), 42, 154, 10.5957/jsr.1998.42.2.154 PDSTRIP, 2006. Program PDSTRIP: Public Domain Strip Method—User Manual. Website: 〈http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdstrip〉. Resolute Weather, 2011. Pierson–Moskowitz Sea Spectrum. 〈http://www.eustis.army.mil/weather〉 (accessed August 2012). Wang, 2002, Longitudinal strength of ships with accidental damages, Mar. Struct., 15, 119, 10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00018-1 Wang, 2002, Assessment of ship's performance in accidents, Mar. Struct., 15, 313, 10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00017-5 Zhu, L., James, P., Zhang, S. (2002). Statistics and damage assessment of ship grounding. Marine Structures, 15, 515–530