Performance Monitoring as a Moderator of the Relations Between Two Conscientiousness Measures and Task Performance

Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994, April). Estimating the power to detect dichotomous moderators, using multiple regression. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN. Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339–353. Allen, R. D. (1981). An evaluation of multiple behavioral criteria and moderator variables for the improvement of cross-situational prediction of behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111–118. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993, August). The joint relationship of conscientiousness and ability with job performance: A test of two theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Cortina, J. M., Doherty, M. L., Schmitt, N., Kaufman, G., & Smith, R. G. (1992). The “big five” personality factors in the IPI and MMPI: Predictors of police performance. Personnel Psychology, 45, 119–140. Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., & Davison, H. K. (1996, April). The incremental validity of conscientiousness scores. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA. Crant, J. M. (1995). The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 532–537. Dipboye, R. L., & Flanagan, M. F. (1979). Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? American Psychologist, 34, 141–150. Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126. Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues in the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–391. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of the markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. Grant, R., & Higgins, C. (1989). Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service. National Productivity Review, 8, 101–112. Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135–164. Hough, L. M. (1992). The “big five” personality variables — construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities [monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581–595. House, R. J., Shane, S. A., & Herold, D. M. (1996). Rumors of the death of dispositional research are greatly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21, 203–224. Jaccard, J., & Becker, M. A. (1990). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34. Larson, J. R., Jr., & Callahan, C. (1990). Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 530–538. Lee, C., Ashford, S. J., & Bobko, P. (1990). Interactive effects of “Type A” behavior and perceived control on worker performance, job satisfaction, and somatic complaints. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 870–881. Locke, E. A. (Ed.) (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington Books: Lexington, MA. London House Press (1991). Personnel Selection Inventory information guide. Rosemont, IL: London House Press. Lubin, A. (1961). The interpretation of significant interaction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 21, 807–817. Lyon, D. (1994). The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN. McGraw-Hill / London House (1996). Personnel selection inventory information guide. Rosemont, IL: McGraw-Hill Companies. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335–354. Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson, & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Monson, T. C., Hesley, J. W., & Chernick, L. (1982). Specifying when personality can and cannot predict behavior: An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single act criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 385–399. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The big five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153–200. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 272–280. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–679. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance [monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703. to5, Working Women Education Fund. (1990). Stories of mistrust and manipulation: The electronic monitoring of the American workforce. Cleveland, OH: Author. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analysis of validity studies published between 1964–1982 and an investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407–422. U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1987). The electronic supervisor: New technology, new tensions (OTA-CIT-333). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. United States Department of Labor (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. United States Department of Labor (1994). Occupational projections and training data (Bulletin 2451). Washington, DC: Author. Yarnold, P. R., Mueser, K. T., & Lyons, J. S. (1988). Type A behavior, accountability, and work rate in small groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 353–360.