Perceptual grouping of objects occupied by target and flankers affects target-flanker interference

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics - Tập 78 - Trang 251-263 - 2015
Chunming Luo1, Robert W. Proctor2
1Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
2Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

Tóm tắt

We report four experiments that tested whether object-based attentional spreading can be modulated by the perceptual structure of objects occupied by target and flankers in a flanker task. The target and flankers were presented on a single object or three separate objects (of same or different shape), displayed at fixed, known locations. The flanker compatibility effect was larger when the target and flankers were on the same object or on three objects of the same shape than when they were on three objects of different shapes, indicating that perceptual grouping of background objects occupied by target and flankers can affect the target-flanker interference. These results imply that attention likely spreads across different objects occupied by target and flankers when these objects are separated by small gaps or have identical shapes, and attentional spreading is impeded when these objects have different shapes, suggesting that object-based attentional spreading can be modulated by the perceptual structure of objects.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baldauf, D., & Desimone, R. (2014). Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. Science, 344, 424–427. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145–162. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011–1036. Brown, J. M., & Denney, H. I. (2007). Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 606–618. Chen, Z. (2012). Object-based attention: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 784–802. Chen, Z., & Cave, K. (2006). Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 992–1003. Chen, Z., & Cave, K. (2008). Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1435–1443. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45–73. Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 576–579. Cousineau, D. (2007). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448–456. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–517. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155–160. Fuentes, L. J., Humphreys, G. W., Agis, I. F., Carmona, E., & Catena, A. (1998). Object-based perceptual grouping affects negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 664–672. Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 897–918. Harms, L., & Bundesen, C. (1983). Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 11–19. Ho, M. C. (2011). Object-based attention: Sensory enhancement or scanning prioritization? Acta Psychologica, 138, 45–51. Hollingworth, A., Maxcey-Richard, A. M., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). The spatial distribution of attention within and across objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 135–151. Kim, M.-S., & Cave, K. R. (2001). Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task. Vision Research, 41, 611–624. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267–284. Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52–66. Lamy, D., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2013). Selective attention. In I. B. Weiner, A. F. Healy, & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Experimental psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 267–294). Hoboken: Wiley. Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (2000). Object features, object locations and object files: Which does selective attention activate and when? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1387–1400. Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Fu, X. (2010). Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 516–530. Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Fu, X. (2011). The modulation of spatial congruency by object-based attention: Analysing the “locus” of the modulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2455–2469. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. Reppa, I., Schmidt, W. C., & Leek, E. C. (2012). Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 43–69. Richard, A. M., Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2008). Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 842–853. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46. Shomstein, S., & Behrmann, M. (2008). Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 132–144. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41–51. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 247–253. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316–320. Weinbach, N., & Henik, A. (2012). The relationship between alertness and executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1530–1540. Zhao, J., Kong, F., & Wang, Y. (2013). Attentional spreading in object-based attention: The roles of target-object and target presentation time. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 876–887.