Perceptions of ownership among new forest owners – A qualitative study in European context

Forest Policy and Economics - Tập 99 - Trang 43-51 - 2019
Anne Matilainen1, M. Koch2, Ivana Živojinović3, Merja Lähdesmäki1, Gun Lidestav4, Heimo Karppinen5,1, François Didolot6, Vilém Jarský7, Priit Põllumäe8, Violaine Colson9, Z. Hricova10, Predrag Glavonjić11, Ramona Elena Scriban12
1University of Helsinki, Finland
2Bavarian State Forest Institute, Germany
3The European Forest Institute Central-East and South-East European Regional Office (EFICEEC-EFISEE), c/o University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Feistmantelstraße 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
4Centre National de la Propriété Forestière, France
5Natural Resources Institute, Finland
6Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
7Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Science, Czech Republic
8Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia
9Office Economique Wallon du Bois, Belgium
10Zvolen Technical University, Slovakia
11University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry, Serbia
12University Ștefan cel Mare Suceava, Romania

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amacher, 2002, Bequest intentions and forest landowners: theory and policy implications, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 1103, 10.1111/1467-8276.00371

Asatryan, 2008, Psychological ownership theory: an exploratory application in the restaurant industry, J. Hosp. Tour. Res., 32, 363, 10.1177/1096348008317391

Bengston, 2011, The diverse values and motivations of family forest owners in the United States: an analysis of an open-ended question in the National Woodland Owner Survey, Small Scale For., 10, 339, 10.1007/s11842-010-9152-9

Best, 2004, Non-governmental organizations: more owners and smaller parcels pose major stewardship challenges, J. For., 102, 10

BMEL

Boon, 2004, An empirical based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: improving communication between authorities and owners, Scand. J. For. Res., 19, 45, 10.1080/14004080410034056

Bouriaud, 2013, Governance of private forests in Eastern and Central Europe: an analysis of forest harvesting and management rights, Ann. For. Res., 56, 199

Brown, 2014, Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: the critical role of trust in the work environment, Pers. Psychol., 67, 463, 10.1111/peps.12048

Butler, 2004, America's family forest owners, J. For., 102, 4

Canadas, 2014, Bringing local socioeconomic context to the analysis of forest owners' management, Land Use Policy, 41, 397, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.017

Côté, 1996, Sociological perspectives on identity formation: the culture–identity link and identity capital, J. Adolesc., 19, 417, 10.1006/jado.1996.0040

Dunford, 2009, The relative importance of psychological versus pecuniary approaches to establishing an ownership culture, 1, 10.1108/S0742-6186(2009)0000016004

Elo, 2008, The qualitative content analysis process, J. Adv. Nurs., 62, 107, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Etikan, 2016, Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling, Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., 5, 1, 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Etzioni, 1991, The socio-economics of property, J. Soc. Behav. Personal., 6, 465

Follo, 2011, Factors influencing Norwegian small-scale private forest owners' ability to meet the political goals, Scand. J. For. Res., 26, 385, 10.1080/02827581.2011.566574

Furby, 1978, Possessions: toward a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle, Vol. 1, 297

Greenfield, 2013, The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000, Psychol. Sci., 24, 1722, 10.1177/0956797613479387

Groesbeck, 2001

Grubbström, 2011, Emotional bonds as obstacles to land sale—attitudes to land among local and absentee landowners in Northwest Estonia, Landsc. Urban Plan., 99, 31, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.010

Härdter, 2002, Urbanised Owners of Private Forest Property – A Chance for Sustainable Rural Development

Hogl, 2005, What is new about new forest owners? A typology of private forest owners in Austria, Small Scale For. Econ. Manag. Policy, 4, 325, 10.1007/s11842-005-0020-y

Hsieh, 2005, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qual. Health Res., 15, 1277, 10.1177/1049732305276687

Hujala, 2007, Decision making among Finnish non-industrial private forest owners: the role of professional opinion and desire to learn, Scand. J. For. Res., 22, 454, 10.1080/02827580701395434

Ikävalko, 2006, Psychological ownership and family businesses: identifying the common ground through discriminant analysis

Ingemarson, 2006, A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden, Scand. J. For. Res., 21, 249, 10.1080/02827580600662256

Johnston, 1985, Community forestry: a sociological approach to urban forestry, Arboricultural J., 9, 121, 10.1080/03071375.1985.9746703

Jörgensen, 2008, Emotional links to forest ownership. Restitution of land and use of a productive resource in Põlva County, Estonia, Fennia Int. J. Geogr., 186, 95

Karppinen, 1998, Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland, Silva Fennica, 32, 43, 10.14214/sf.699

Karppinen, 2012, New forest owners and owners-to-be: apples and oranges?, Small Scale For., 11, 15, 10.1007/s11842-011-9165-z

Karppinen, 2015, Forest owners' stand improvement decisions: applying the theory of planned behavior, Forest Policy Econ., 50, 275, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.009

Karppinen, 2010, “Semmonen niinku metsäkansa”: Suurten ikäluokkien perijät tulevaisuuden metsänomistajina [“kind of forest people”: inheritors of the postwar baby-boom generation as the future forest owners], Metsätieteen Aikakauskirja, 1, 19

Kuuluvainen, 2014, Effects of gender and length of land tenure on timber supply in Finland, J. For. Econ., 20, 363

Lähdesmäki, 2014, Born to be a forest owner? An empirical study of the aspects of psychological ownership in the context of inherited forests in Finland, Scand. J. For. Res., 29, 101, 10.1080/02827581.2013.869348

Lähdesmäki, 2016, Legitimating institutional choices in the forest ownership: building acceptability for jointly owned forests, Eur. J. For. Res., 135, 1055, 10.1007/s10342-016-0993-4

Legard, 2003, In-depth interviews, 138

Leppänen, 2015

Lichtman, 2014, 418

Lidestav, 2013, Harvesting and silvicultural activities in Swedish family forestry – behavior changes from a gender perspective, Scand. J. For. Res., 28, 10.1080/02827581.2012.701324

Lincoln, 1994, The fifth moment, 1, 575

Liu, 2012, Psychological ownership: how having control matters, J. Manag. Stud., 49, 869, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01028.x

Markowski-Lindsay, 2012, Family forest owner preferences for biomass harvesting in Massachusetts, Forest Policy Econ., 14, 127, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.08.001

Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 11, No. 3).

Matilainen, 2014, Nature-based tourism in private forests: stakeholder management balancing the interests of entrepreneurs and forest owners?, J. Rural. Stud., 35, 70, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.007

Matilainen, 2014, Metsänomistuksen tulevaisuus Etelä-ja Keski-Pohjanmaalla–Selvitys metsänomistajakunnan muutoksesta ja palvelutarpeista

Matilainen, 2017, “I feel it is mine!”–Psychological ownership in relation to natural resources, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 31, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.002

Mikkola, 2003

Ni Dhubháin, 2007, The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship, Small Scale For., 6, 347, 10.1007/s11842-007-9030-2

Nonić, 2013, Tipologija vlasnika privatnih šuma u Srbiji [Typology of private forest owners in Serbia], Šumarstvo, 3-4, 133

Pachova, NI., Tikkanen, I., Pajari, B., and Nevenic R. (2004). Introduction: capacity needs for forest policy development in countries with economies in transition. In: Jansky L, Nevenic R, Tikkanen I, Pajari B. (Eds). Forests in Transition II: Challenges in Strengthening of Capacities for Forest Policy Development in Countries With Economies in Transition. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University; 1–16.

Patton, 2002

Pierce, 2011

Pierce, 2001, Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organizations, Acad. Manag. Rev., 26, 298, 10.2307/259124

Pierce, 2003, The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research, Rev. Gen. Psychol., 7, 84, 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

Pierce, 2004, The psychology of ownership and worker-owner productivity, Group & Organization Management, 29, 588, 10.1177/1059601103254270

Pohja-Mykrä, 2014

Pulkrab, 2015, Production potential of the forests in the Czech Republic, Bioresources, 10, 4711, 10.15376/biores.10.3.4711-4725

Raffelsberger, 2009

Rämö, 2009

Šalka, 2006, The effects of property transformation on forestry entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of Slovakia, Forest Policy Econ., 8, 716, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.017

Sarvašová, 2014, Forest owners associations in the central and eastern European region, Small Scale For., 14, 217, 10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5

Schmithüsen, 2010, Private forest ownership in Europe, 26

Šišák, 2016, Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic—their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use, Land Use Policy, 50, 390, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.006

State of Europe's Forests 2015

Statistisches Bundesamt

Teder, 2015, Structural changes of state forest management organisations in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia and Slovakia since 1990, Baltic For., 21, 326

Tykkä, 2010

Volz, 1998, Zur Soziologie des Kleinprivatwaldes, Forst und Holz, 67

Weiland, 2010, Sustainability transitions in transition countries: Forest policy reforms in South-eastern Europe, Environ. Policy Gov., 20, 397, 10.1002/eet.558

Weiss, 2012, Review of forest owners’ organizations in selected Eastern European countries, 57

Weiss, 2018, Forest ownership changes in Europe: State of knowledge and conceptual foundations, For. Policy Econ.

Ziegenspeck, 2004, Lifestyles of private forest owners as an indication of social change, Forest Policy Econ., 6, 447, 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.01.004

Živojinović, 2015, 693