Perception, selection, and structural economy
Tóm tắt
In this essay I will explore the syntactic expression of the notion ‘clause’ by focusing on some syntactic and semantic properties of bare infinitive (BI) complements to perception verbs in English. I shall argue briefly that perception BI complements must be clausal, and then turn in more detail to the issue of what sort of clause the BI complement must be. It will be established that the categorical nature of the perception BI complement as IP or VP is contingent on selectional properties of the perception verb, properties which may be contextually influenced by modality and negation. More specifically, an interpretative distinction between ‘vision’ and ‘non-vision’see first suggested by Napoli (1988) will be shown, contrary to her proposal, to provide the key to the contrast in the selection of clausal types. The IP/VP distinction will be shown to correlate with the viability of interpretations for the BI clause that are ‘temporally independent’ of the matrix clause. Given the IP/VP distinction, it will be demonstrated further that the peculiarly limited distribution of the expletive formativethere in BI complements may be predicted from independently motivated syntactic principles that determine clausal structure.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akmajian, A.: 1977, ‘The Complement Structure of Perception Verbs in an Autonomous Syntax Framework’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.),Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 427–460.
Arimoto, M.: 1991, ‘There-Insertion and the Structure of Sentences/Small Clauses’, in H. Nakajima and S. Tonoike (eds.),Topics in Small Clauses, Kurosio Publishers, Tokyo, pp. 107–146.
Barss, A.: 1985, ‘Remarks on Akmajian's “The Complement Structure of Perception Verbs” and Gee's “Comments on the Paper by Akmajian”’, in B. Levin (ed.),Lexical Semantics in Review, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, pp. 149–165.
Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983,Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Burzio, L.: 1986,Italian Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N.: 1991, ‘Some Notes on the Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Freidin,Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 417–454.
Chomsky, N.: 1992, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, MITWPL Occasional Paper 1, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
Chung, S. and J. McCloskey: 1987, ‘Government, Barriers and Small Clauses in Modern Irish’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 173–237.
Cinque, G.: 1990,Types of A′ -Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Diesing, M.: 1992,Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Gee, J.: 1977, ‘Comments on the Paper by Akmajian’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.),Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 461–482.
Heycock, C.: 1991,Layers of Predication: The Non-lexical Syntax of Clauses, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘The Logic of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’,Journal of Philosophy 80, 100–127.
Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.
Holmberg, A.: 1986,Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and in English, Department of General Linguistics, University of Stockholm.
Karttunen, L.: 1971, ‘Implicative Verbs’,Language 47, 340–358.
Kayne, R. S.: 1981, ‘On Certain Differences Between French and English’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–372.
Kitagawa, Y.: 1986,Subject in Japanese and English, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kluender, R.: 1986, ‘Sätzchen: German Small Clauses as S's’, in S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 16, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 274–292.
Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche: 1988, ‘Subjects’, ms., UCLA.
Kratzer, A.: 1989, ‘Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kuroda, Y.: 1988, ‘Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese’,Linguisticae Investigationes 12, 1–47.
Lasnik, H.: 1992, ‘Case and Expletives: Notes Towards a Parametric Account’,Linguistic Inquiry 23, 381–405.
Mittwoch, A.: 1990, ‘On the Distribution of Bare Infinitive Complements in English’,Journal of Linguistics 26, 103–131.
Napoli, D.: 1988, ‘Subjects and External Arguments Clauses and Nonclauses’,Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 323–354.
Neale, S.: 1988, ‘Events and “Logical Form”’,Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 303–321.
Pesetsky, D.: 1991, ‘Zero Syntax’, ms., MIT.
Parsons, T.: 1990,Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Safir, K.: 1985a,Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Safir, K.: 1985b, ‘Missing Subjects in German’, in J. Toman (ed.),Studies in German Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 193–230.
Safir, K.: 1986, ‘On Implicit Arguments and Thematic Structure’, in S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 16, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Safir, K.: 1987, ‘What Explains the Definiteness Effect’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.),The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 71–97.
Safir, K.: 1992, ‘What's in a Complement?’, ms. (transcript of NELS 22 talk), Rutgers University.
Safir, K.: 1993, ‘Structural Economy’, ms, Rutgers University.
Stowell, T.: 1983, ‘Subjects Across Categories’,The Linguistic Review 2, 285–312.
Vlach, F.: 1983, ‘On Situation Semantics for Perception’,Synthese 54, 129–152.
Webelhuth, G.: 1992,Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation, Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Williams, E.: 1984, ‘There-insertion’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 131–153.