Perceived safety of donor blood and blood substitutes for transfusion: the role of informational frame, patient groups and stress appraisals

Transfusion Medicine - Tập 15 Số 5 - Trang 401-412 - 2005
Eamonn Ferguson1, Joanna Leaviss2, Ellen Townsend2, Piers Fleming2, K. C. Lowe3
1School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
2School of Psychology, and
3School of Biology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Tóm tắt

summary.  Patients express concerns about the safety of donated blood. Do they have similar concerns about potential ‘blood substitutes’ and does the way information is presented on these options alter patients' perceptions? A two (informational frame: gain or loss) by four (transfusion type: human donor blood, human haemoglobin, bovine haemoglobin or perfluorocarbon emulsion substitutes) by three (patient group: adult haemophiliac/leukaemia patients, relatives/friends of haemophiliac/leukaemia patients and controls) between‐subjects design was used. There were 82 patients, 118 relatives/friends and 263 controls from the UK. Blood substitutes were perceived as being significantly less safe than donor blood. Perceptions of safety were greater when transfusion information (regardless of transfusion type or patient group) was presented as gains rather than losses. Different demographic and psychological factors predicted perceived safety (e.g. sex) and perceived risk (e.g. age and experience).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/nrd1307

10.1037/0278-6133.22.1.60

10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.178

Cohen J., 1983, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.217

10.1037/0278-6133.18.2.189

10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41111335.x

10.1111/j.0958-7578.2004.00501.x

10.1046/j.1365-3148.2001.00295-4.x

Ferguson E., 2004, Decisions about intentions to use medical bioengineering; differential sensitivity effects between America and the UK, Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 12, 42

10.1348/014466500163176

10.1348/135910799168506

10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02635.x

10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40081017.x

10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647

10.1126/science.285.5426.384

10.1136/bmj.327.7417.741

10.1126/science.290.5500.2261

10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341

10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x

10.1006/obhd.1998.2781

10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00021-3

10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00402.x

10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00401.x

10.1006/obhd.1998.2804

10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267

10.1089/107632703322066570

10.1081/BIO-100103042

10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01149.x

10.1136/bmj.327.7417.731

Midgley M., 2003, The myths we live by

10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745

10.1016/S1532-0464(02)00009-6

10.1136/bmj.327.7417.735

10.1021/cr970143c

10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x

10.1002/bdm.3960040403

Robb K.A., 2004, Demographic and psychological factors associated with perceived risk for colorectal cancer, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 13, 366, 10.1158/1055-9965.366.13.3

Rothman A.J., 2003, The Self‐Regulation of Health and Illness Behavior, 279

10.1177/0146167299259003

10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3

10.1006/jesp.1993.1019

10.1111/0272-4332.202020

10.1177/0146167296223004

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02775.x

Tabachnick B.G., 1996, Using Multivariate Statistics

10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.16

10.2307/1914185

10.1126/science.7455683

10.1016/0030-5073(81)90024-6

10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.31

10.1006/obhd.1996.0053