Perceived Risk and Benefit of Nuclear Waste Repositories: Four Opinion Clusters

Risk Analysis - Tập 33 Số 6 - Trang 1038-1048 - 2013
Roman Seidl1, Corinne Moser1, Michael Stauffacher1, Pius Krütli1
1ETH Zurich, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED) CH‐8092 Zurich Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Local public resistance can block the site‐selection process, construction, and operation of nuclear waste repositories. Social science has established that the perception of risks and benefits, trust in authorities, and opinion on nuclear energy play important roles in acceptance. In particular, risk and benefit evaluations seem critical for opinion formation. However, risks and benefits have rarely been studied independently and, most often, the focus has been on the two most salient groups of proponents and opponents. The aim of this exploratory study is to examine the often‐neglected majority of people holding ambivalent or indifferent opinions. We used cluster analysis to examine the sample (N = 500, mailed survey in German‐speaking Switzerland) in terms of patterns of risk and benefit perception. We reveal four significantly different and plausible clusters: one cluster with high‐benefit ratings in favor of a repository and one cluster with high‐risk ratings opposing it; a third cluster shows ambivalence, with high ratings on both risk and benefit scales and moderate opposition, whereas a fourth cluster seems indifferent, rating risks and benefits only moderately compared to the ambivalent cluster. We conclude that a closer look at the often neglected but considerable number of people with ambivalent or indifferent opinions is necessary. Although the extreme factions of the public will most probably not change their opinion, we do not yet know how the opinion of the ambivalent and indifferent clusters might develop over time.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.022

10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.010

10.1504/IJNGEE.2010.032704

10.1080/09644016.2011.551030

10.1080/1366987042000175489

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x

10.1080/1943815X.2010.506879

10.2202/1944-4079.1036

10.1111/1539-6924.00352

10.1126/science.254.5038.1603

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.005

10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01465.x

10.1111/0272-4332.202020

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S

10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00694.x

10.1080/00224545.1982.9922770

10.1111/0272-4332.203034

10.1080/1366987032000105315

10.1177/0146167200263009

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01419.x

10.1016/S0272-4944(85)80040-2

Sjöberg L, 2009, Public risk perception of nuclear waste, International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 11, 248

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00380.x

Thompson MM, 1995, Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, 361

10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30

10.1177/0146167207312527

10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.012

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60414-1

10.2307/2111583

10.1037/h0032590

Scholz RW, 2007, Entscheidungsprozesse Wellenberg: Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle in der Schweiz [Decision Process Wellenberg: Storage of Nuclear Waste in Switzerland], Zürich, Chur: Rüegger

StauffacherM KrütliP ScholzRW. (eds).Gesellschaft und radioaktive Abfälle: Ergebnisse einer schweizweiten Befragung [Society and Radioactive Wastes: Results of a Switzerland‐Wide Survey].Zürich Chur:Rüegger 2008.

SFOE, 2008, Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories: Conceptual Part

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01262.x

10.2307/448780

10.1145/331499.331504

Aldenderfer MS, 1999, Cluster Analysis

10.1007/BF01897163

Field AP, 2009, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS

10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00628.x

10.1023/B:RIAN.0000005926.03250.c0

10.1177/0013916596283003

10.1007/s10588-005-6282-2

Kottonau J, 2004, Simulating political attitudes and voting behavior, JASSS‐The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 7

Schori S, 2009, Siting of nuclear waste repositories in Switzerland and Sweden—Stakeholder preferences for the interplay between technical expertise and societal input, Zürich: ETH Zürich. Eth‐NSSI TdLab

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00828.x

10.1086/510224

10.1024//0044-3514.31.3.153

10.1007/s11211-012-0147-x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Risk Analysis

Tập 33 Số 6

1038-1048

Thông tin tác giả