Perceived Arrival Time of Disaster Relief Supplies Matters for Household Preparedness for Natural Disasters
Tóm tắt
This paper addresses whether and to what extent individual subjective perception of the time it takes for disaster relief supplies to arrive (i.e., perceived arrival time) affects households’ emergency drinking water (EDW) preparedness behavior for natural disasters, based on household data originally collected through an internet survey in Japan in 2013. Our estimation results show that perceived arrival time significantly matters for household stocks of EDW and that the amount of EDW could be greatly enhanced as perceived arrival time increases. Moreover, households in risk-prone areas stock more EDW compared with households in less risk-prone areas. Perceived arrival time can be interpreted as a kind of risk perception, and our results illustrate the counterexample of the so-called risk perception paradox.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Armas I (2008) Social vulnerability and seismic risk perception. Case study: the historic center of the Bucharest municipality/Romania. Nat Hazards 47(3):397–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9229-3
Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH (2012) A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 32(9):1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Kreibich H, Aerts JCJH, (2013) Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour. Global Environmental Change 23 (5):1327–1338
Cabinet Office (2011) Interim report about Conference on disaster emergency measures in the Great East Japan Earthquake. http://www.bousai.go.jp/oukyu/higashinihon/pdf/cyukan_torimatome.pdf Accessed 2nd September 2019
Cabinet Office (2016a) Report about verification of initial response on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake.http://www.bousai.go.jp/updates/h280414jishin/h28kumamoto/pdf/h280720shodo.pdf. Accessed 2nd September 2019
Cabinet Office (2016b) A survey result on awareness and activities to disaster prevention in daily life.http://www.bousai.go.jp/kohou/oshirase/pdf/20160531_02kisya.pdf. Accessed 2nd September 2019
Cabinet Office (2019) White Paper on Disaster Management, Appendix 6 http://www.bousai.go.jp/kaigirep/hakusho/pdf/R1_fuzokusiryo.pdf Accessed 2nd September 2019
Disaster Management Plan (2019) http://www.bousai.go.jp/taisaku/keikaku/pdf/kihon_basic_plan190531.pdf Accessed 2nd September 2019
Goeschl T, Managi S (2019) Public in-kind relief and private self-insurance. Economics of Disaters and climate change 3(1):3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-018-0031-8
Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2008) Whose reality counts? Factors affecting the perception of volcanic risk. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.012
Japan Meteorological Agency (2019) Explanation of JMA intensity scale. https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/know/shindo/jma-shindo-kaisetsu-pub.pdf Accessed 3rd September 2019
Jóhannesdóttir G, Gísladóttir G (2010) People living under threat of volcanic hazard in southern Iceland: vulnerability and risk perception. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10(2):407–420. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-407-2010
Karanci A, Nuray AB, Dirik G (2005) Impact of a community disaster awareness training program in Turkey: does it influence hazard-related cognitions and preparedness behaviors. Social behavior and personality: an international journal 33(3):243–258 https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.3.243
Mainichi Newspaper in electric edition (2018a). 9th July, Japan https://mainichi.jp/articles/20180709/dde/041/040/063000c Accessed 13th September 2018
Mainichi Newspaper in electric edition (2018b). 13th July, Japan https://mainichijp/articles/20180713/dde/001/040/054000c Accessed 7 November 2018
Miceli R, Sotgiu I, Settanni M (2008) Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol 28(2):164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.006
Motoyoshi T, Takao K, Ikeda S (2008) Determinants of household- and community-based disaster preparedness. Japanese journal of social psychology 23:209–220. https://doi.org/10.14966/jssp.KJ00004896217
Nikkei Newspaper in electric edition (2016a). 18th April, Japan https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXLASDG18HE8_Y6A410C1CC1000/ Accessed 13th September 2018
Nikkei Newspaper in electric edition (2016b). 16th May, Japan https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXKASDG10H41_Q6A510C1MM8000/ Accessed 13th September 2018
Njome Manga S, Suh Cheo E, Chuyong G, Wit de Maarten J (2010) Volcanic risk perception in rural communities along the slopes of Mount Cameroon, west-Central Africa. J Afr Earth Sci 58(4):608–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2010.08.007
Onuma H, Shin KJ, Managi S (2017) Household preparedness for natural disasters: impact of disaster experience and implications for future disaster risks in Japan. International journal of disaster risk reduction 21:148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.004
Osberghaus D (2015) The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany—evidence from a nationwide survey. Ecol Econ 110:36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.010
Renn O (1990) Risk perception and risk management. The intuitive mechanisms of risk perceptions. Risk Abstracts 7(1):1–9
Saotome A, Numada M, Meguro K (2012) Changes of contents and amount of relief goods during the 2011 off the pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake –case study of the relief goods distributed in Sendai City. Journal of Japan society of civil engineers series A1 68(4):I969–I-975. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejseee.68.I_969
Sekiya N, Tanaka A (2016) Evacuation decision making process: analysis of questionnaire survey in coast of the Japan Sea. Japanese Society for Natural Disaster Science 35:91–103
Siegrist M, Gutscher H, (2006) Flooding Risks: A Comparison of Lay People's Perceptions and Expert's Assessments in Switzerland. Risk Analysis 26 (4):971–979
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science. 236(4799):280–285
Solberg C, Rossetto T, Joffe H (2010) The social psychology of seismic hazard adjustment: re-evaluating the international literature. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10(8):1663–1677. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1663-2010
Takao K, Motoyoshi T, Sato T, Fukuzondo T, Seo K, Ikeda S (2004) Factors determining residents’ preparedness for floods in modern megalopolises: the case of the Tokai flood disaster in Japan. Journal of Risk Research 7(7–8):775–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987031000075996
Tekeli-Yesil S, Dedeoglu N, Braun-Fahrlaender C, Tanner M (2010) Factors motivating individuals to take precautionary action for an expected earthquake in Istanbul. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 30(8):181–1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01424.x
Terpstra T (2011) Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Anal 31(10):1658–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x
Wachinger G et al. (2010) Risk perception and natural hazards. WP-3-review of the EU-project CAPHAZ-NET http://caphaznet.org/outcomes-results/CapHaz-Net WP3 RiskPerception2.pdf accessed 13th September 2018
Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C (2013) The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal 33(6):1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
Wooldridge (2010) Jeffrey M. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data MIT press pp 65-72, pp 562–565