People and biodiversity in the 21st century
Tóm tắt
Fifty years have elapsed since the first publication of Ambio. Throughout this period, fundamental changes have occurred in societal attitudes to biodiversity conservation. Ambio has published numerous papers that have aligned with these new approaches. High citations numbers suggest that Ambio papers have had a significant impact on conservation strategies. We review these publications and find that they align well with changed societal perspectives on biodiversity. Ambio papers have called for greater contributions of local and indigenous peoples and for conservation in multi-functional landscapes. The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity built on these principles. Negotiations are now underway for a post-2020 framework for biodiversity. Ambio papers have argued for a stronger scientific basis for conservation and for the need to adapt to changing conditions and to the rich diversity of societal preferences for conservation. International processes favor simple, generalizable approaches to conservation but we call for recognition of the diversity of ecological and human conditions in which conservation occurs. There is a need to build capacity to support a diversity of conservation approaches that are adapted to changing local conditions and to the priorities of diverse human societies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agrawal, A., and C.C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27: 629–649.
Batisse, M. 1982. The biosphere reserve: A tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation 9: 101–111.
Bengtsson, J., P. Angelstam, T. Elmqvist, U. Emanuelsson, C. Folke, M. Ihse, F. Moberg, and M. Nyström. 2003. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32: 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-32.6.389.
Boedhihartono, A.K., F. Bongers, R.G. Boot, J. van Dijk, H. Jeans, M. van Kuijk, H. Koster, J. Reed, et al. 2018. Conservation science and practice must engage with the realities of complex tropical landscapes. Tropical Conservation Science 11: 1940082918779571.
Boitani, L., R.M. Cowling, H.T. Dublin, G.M. Mace, J. Parrish, H.P. Possingham, R.L. Pressey, C. Rondinini, et al. 2008. Change the IUCN protected area categories to reflect biodiversity outcomes. PLoS Biology 6: e66.
Brandon, K.E., and M. Wells. 1992. Planning for people and parks: Design dilemmas. World Development 20: 557–570.
Brosius, J.P. 1997. Endangered species, endangered people: Environmental representations of indigenous knowledge. Human Ecology 25: 47–69.
Brundtland, G.H. 1987. Report of the World Commission on environment and development:” our common future.”, United Nations.
Bull, G., A. Boedhihartono, G. Bueno, B. Cashore, C. Elliott, J. Langston, R. Riggs, and J. Sayer. 2018. Global forest discourses must connect with local forest realities. International Forestry Review 20: 160–166.
Conway, G., and K. Wilson. 2012. One billion hungry: Can we feed the world?. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Daily, G. 1997. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington: Island Press.
Dixon, J.A., L. Fallon Scura, and T. van’t Hof. 1993. Meeting ecological and economic goals: Marine parks in the Caribbean. Ambio 22: 117–125.
Dudley, N., A. Phillips, T. Amend, J. Brown, and S. Stolton. 2016. Evidence for biodiversity conservation in protected landscapes. Land 5: 38.
Folke, C. 1989. The role of ecosystems for a sustainable development of aquaculture. Ambio 18: 234–243.
Gadgil, M., F. Berkes, and C. Folke. 1993. Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22: 151–156.
Hanski, I. 2011. Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40: 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0147-3.
Hockings, M., S. Stolton, and F. Leverington. 2006. Evaluating Effectiveness: A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. Gland: IUCN.
IUCN & WWF. 1980. World conservation strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland: IUCN.
Kelleher, G.G., and R.A. Kenchington. 1982. Australia’s Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: making development compatible with conservation. Ambio 11: 262–267.
Laurance, W.F., J. Sayer, and K.G. Cassman. 2013. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29: 107–116.
Locke, H., and P. Dearden. 2005. Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environmental Conservation 32: 1–10.
McNeely, J.A. 1994. Protected areas for the 21st century: Working to provide benefits to society. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 390–405.
McNeely, J.A., and K.R. Miller. 1984. National parks, conservation, and development: The role of protected areas in sustaining society. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Perrings, C., C. Folke, and K.-G. Mäler. 1992. The ecology and economics of biodiversity loss: the research agenda. Ambio 21: 201–211.
Poore, D., and J. Sayer. 1991. The management of tropical moist forest lands: Ecological guidelines. Gland: IUCN.
Sari, D.A., C. Margules, A.K. Boedhihartono, and J. Sayer. 2018. Criteria and indicators to audit the performance of complex, multi-functional forest landscapes. Routledge: Routledge Handbook of Sustainability Indicators.
Sari, D.A., J. Sayer, C. Margules, and A.K. Boedhihartono. 2019. Determining the effectiveness of forest landscape governance: A case study from the Sendang landscape, South Sumatra. Forest policy and economics 102: 17–28.
Sayer, J.A., and B.M. Campbell. 2004. The science of sustainable development: Local livelihoods and the global environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayer, J., N. Ishwaran, J. Thorsell, and T. Sigaty. 2000. Tropical forest biodiversity and the world heritage convention. Ambio 29: 302–309.
Sayer, J.A., C. Elliot, and S. Maginnis. 2003. Protect, manage and restore; Conserving forests in multi-functional landscapes. In: Congress., ed., P. O. T. T. W. F. Quebec, Canada.
Sayer, J.A., S. Maginnis, and M. Laurie. 2005. Forests in landscapes: Ecosystem approaches to sustainability. The World Conservation Union. Cambridge: IUCN, Forest Conservation Programme.
Sayer, J., G. Bull, and C. Elliott. 2008. Mediating forest transitions: ‘Grand design’or’Muddling through’. Conservation and Society 6: 320.
Sayer, J.A., C. Margules, A.K. Boedhihartono, T. Sunderland, J.D. Langston, J. Reed, R. Riggs, L.E. Buck, et al. 2016. Measuring the effectiveness of landscape approaches to conservation and development. Sustainability Science 1–12.
Sheil, D., R. Puri, M. Wan, I. Basuki, M.V. Heist, N. Liswanti, I. Rachmatika, and I. Samsoedin. 2006. Recognizing local people’s priorities for tropical forest biodiversity. Ambio 35: 17–24.
Wells, M. 1992. Biodiversity conservation, affluence and poverty: Mismatched costs and benefits and efforts to remedy them. Ambio 21: 237–243.
Wells, M., and K. Brandon. 1993. Conceptual and practical issues arising from the integration of biodiversity conservation with social and economic development outside park boundaries. Ambio 22: 157–162.
Wilson, E.O. 1988. The current state of biological diversity. Biodiversity 521: 3–18.
Wilson, E.O. 2016. Half-earth: Our planet’s fight for life. New York: WW Norton & Company.