People Choice Modelling for Evacuation of Tall Buildings

Tubbs J, Meacham B (2009) Selecting appropriate evacuation strategies for super tall buildings: current challenges and needs. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on human behaviour in fire. Robinson College, Cambridge, pp 41–50

Luo M, Wong KHL (2006) Evacuation strategy for super highrise buildings. In: 5th annual seminar tall building construction and maintenance. Hong Kong

Bukowski RW (2008) Emergency egress from ultra tall buildings. In: Tall & green, typology for a sustainable urban future, CTBUH, Dubai, p 9

Bukowski RW, Tubbs JS (2016) Egress concepts and design approaches BT. In: Hurley MJ, Gottuk DT, Hall Jr. JR, Harada K, Kuligowski ED, Puchovsky M, Torero JL, Watts Jr. JM, Wieczorek CJ (eds) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, pp 2012–2046

Ronchi E, Nilsson D (2013) Fire evacuation in high-rise buildings: a review of human behaviour and modelling research. Fire Sci Rev 2(1):1–21

Kinateder MT, Omori H, Kuligowski ED (2014) The use of elevators for evacuation in fire emergencies in international buildings, pp 1–29

Clawson K, O’Connor DJ (2011) Considerations and challenges for refuge areas in tall buildings. In: CTBUH 2011 world conference, pp 332–338

Barber D, Johnson P (2015) Refuge floors—history, implementation and methods for improvement. In: Human behaviour in fire proceedings of the 6th international symposium, pp 245–256

Ariff A (2003) Review of evacuation procedures for petronas twin towers. In: CIB-CTBUH international conference on tall buildings. CIB Publication no: 290, Kuala Lumpur

Kuligowski ED (2016) Human behavior in fire. In: Hurley MJ, Gottuk DT, Hall JR, Harada K, Kuligowski ED, Puchovsky M, Torer JL, Watts JM, Wieczorek CJ (eds) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, NY, pp 2070–2114

Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1977) Behavioral decision theory. Annu Rev Psychol 28(1):1–39

Lovreglio R (2016) Modelling decision-making in fire evacuation using random utility theory. Politecnico di Bari, Milano

Zakay D (1993) The impact of time perception processes on decision making under time stress. In: Svenson O, Maule AJ (eds) Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 59–72

Ben Zur H, Breznitz SJ (1981) The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychol (Amst) 47(2):89–104

Averill JD, Mileti DS, Peacock RD, Kuligowski ED, Groner N, Proulx G, Reneke AP (2005) Final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster, occupant behaviour. Egress and emergency communications. September. NIST NCSTAR 1–7. National Institute of St

Lovreglio R (2016) Modelling decision-making in fire evacuation based on random utility theory. PhD Dissertation Politecnico of Bari, Milan and Turin

Lovreglio R, Borri D, Ronchi E, Fonzone A, Dell’Olio L (2015) The need of latent variables for modelling decision-making in evacuation simulations. In: Proceedings of the IX international workshop on planning and evaluation, Bari

Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ 15(5):447–470

Ben-Akiva M, Boccara B (1995) Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. Int J Res Mark 12(1):9–24

Small KA, Rosen HS (1981) Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econ J Econ Soc 49(1):105–130

Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, vol 9. MIT Press, Cambridge

Bhat CR (2003) Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transp Res Part B Methodol 37(9):837–855

Lovreglio R, Borri D, Dell’Olio L, Ibeas A (2014) A discrete choice model based on random utilities for exit choice in emergency evacuations. Saf Sci 62:418–426

Lovreglio R, Fonzone A, Dell’Olio L (2016) A mixed logit model for predicting exit choice during building evacuations. Transp Res Part A 92:59–75

Lovreglio R, Fonzone A, Dell’Olio L, Borri D (2016) A study of herding behaviour in exit choice during emergencies based on random utility theory. Saf Sci 82:421–431

Haghani M, Sarvi M, Shahhoseini Z (2015) Accommodating taste heterogeneity and desired substitution pattern in exit choices of pedestrian crowd evacuees using a mixed nested logit model. J Choice Model 16:58–68

Haghani M, Sarvi M (2017) Stated and revealed exit choices of pedestrian crowd evacuees. Transp Res Part B Methodol 95:238–259

Kinsey MJ, Galea ER, Lawrence PJ (2011) Stairs or lifts?—a study of human factors associated with lift/elevator usage during evacuations using an online survey. In: Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 627–636

Andrée K, Daniel N, Joakim E (2015) Evacuation experiments in a virtual reality high-rise building: exit choice and waiting time for evacuation elevators. Fire Mater 40(4):554–567

Galea ER, Hulse L, Day R, Siddiqui A, Sharp G (2012) The UK WTC 9/11 evacuation study: an overview of findings derived from first‐hand interview data and computer modelling. Fire Mater 36(5–6):501–521

Ding N, Chen T, Zhang H (2016) Experimental study of elevator loading and unloading time during evacuation in high-rise buildings. Fire Technol 53(1):1–14

Dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P (2011) The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transp Policy 18(1):217–227

Australian Building Codes Board (2013) Lifts used during evacuation, no. 2013

NFPA (2012) NFPA 101 life safety code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy

Aloi S, Rogers J (2001) Evacuation and life safety strategies for super high rise buildings. In: Building for the 21st century: technology, livability, productivity, pp 429–436

Gwynne SMV, Boyce KE, Kuligowski ED, Nilsson D, Robbins A, Lovrelgio R (2016) Pros and cons of egress drills. In: Interflam 2016, 14th international conference on fire science and engineering

Notarianni KA, Parry GW (2016) Uncertainty. In: Hurley MJ, Gottuk DT, Hall JR, Harada K, Kuligowski ED, Puchovsky M, Torer JL, Watts JM, Wieczorek CJ (eds) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, NY, pp 2992–3047

McGuire WJ (1969) The nature of attitudes and attitude change. Handb Soc Psychol 3(2):136–314

Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH (1953) Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press, New Haven

Pathfinder Thunderhead (2017) Technical reference

Hanemann M, Loomis J, Kanninen B (1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 73(4):1255–1263

Cai Y, Deilami I, Train K (1998) Customer retention in a competitive power market: analysis of a ‘double-bounded plus follow-ups’ questionnaire. Energy J, 19(2):191–215

Kinateder M (2013) Social influence in emergency situations–studies in virtual reality. Phd Dissertation University of Wuerzburg

Kuligowski ED (2016) Computer evacuation models for buildings. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, pp 2152–2180

Train K (2000) Halton sequences for mixed logit. Department of Economics, UCB, Berkeley

Train K, Croissant Y (2012) Kenneth Train’s exercises using the mlogit package for R. R 25:2

Neyman J, Pearson ES (1933) On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Biometrika A 20:175–240