Pecunia non olet: on the self-selection into (dis)honest earning opportunities

Kai A. Konrad1, Tim Lohse1,2,3, Sven A. Simon1
1Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, Munich, Germany
2CESifo Munich, Germany
3Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Germany

Tóm tắt

We study self-selection into earning money in an honest or dishonest fashion based on individuals’ attitudes toward truthful reporting. We propose a decision-theoretic framework where individuals’ willingness to pay for honest earnings is determined by their (behavioral) lying costs. Our laboratory experiment identifies lying costs as the decisive factor causing self-selection into honest earning opportunities for individuals with high costs and into cheating opportunities for those prepared to misreport. Our experimental setup allows us to recover individual lying costs and their distribution in the population.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abeler, J., Nosenzo, D., & Raymond, C. (2019). Preferences for truth-telling. Econometrica, 87(4), 1115–1153.

Alm, J., Bloomquist, K. M., & McKee, M. (2015). On the external validity of laboratory tax compliance experiments. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 1170–1186.

Banerjee, R., Baul, T., & Rosenblat, T. (2015). On self selection of the corrupt into the public sector. Economics Letters, 127, 43–46.

Becker, G., DeGroot, M., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232.

Cingl, L., & Korbel, V. (2020). External validity of a laboratory measure of cheating: Evidence from Czech juvenile detention centers. Economics Letters, 191, 109094.

Cohn, A., & Maréchal, M. A. (2018). Laboratory measure of cheating predicts school misconduct. Economic Journal, 128, 2743–2754.

Dai, Z., Galeotti, F., & Villeval, M. C. (2018). Cheating in the lab predicts fraud in the field: An experiment in public transportation. Management Science, 64(3), 1081–1100.

Dionne, G., & Eeckhoudt, L. (1985). Self-insurance, self-protection and increased risk aversion. Economics Letters, 17, 39–42.

Ehrlich, I., & Becker, G. S. (1972). Market insurance, self-insurance and self-protection. Journal of Political Economy, 80(4), 623–648.

Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669.

Faravelli, M., Friesen, L., & Gangadharan, L. (2015). Selection, tournaments, and dishonesty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 110, 160–175.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.

Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise–An experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525–547.

Fosgaard, T. R., Hansen, L. G., & Piovesan, M. (2013). Separating will from grace: An experiment on conformity and awareness in cheating. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 279–284.

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.

Garbarino, E., Slonim, R., & Villeval, M. C. (2019). Loss aversion and lying behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 158, 379–393.

Gerlach, P., Teodorescu, K., & Hertwig, R. (2019). The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 1–44.

Gibson, R., Tanner, C., & Wagner, A. F. (2013). Preferences for truthfulness: Heterogeneity among and within individuals. American Economic Review, 103(1), 532–548.

Gino, F., Krupka, E. L., & Weber, R. A. (2015). License to cheat: Voluntary regulation and ethical behavior. Management Science, 59(10), 2187–2203.

Gneezy, U., Kajackaite, A., & Sobel, J. (2018). Lying aversion and the size of the lie. American Economic Review, 108(2), 419–453.

Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125.

Grolleau, G., Kocher, M. G., & Sutan, A. (2016). Cheating and loss aversion: Do people cheat more to avoid a loss? Management Science, 62(12), 3428–3438.

Hanna, R., & Wang, S. (2017). Dishonesty and selection into public service: Evidence from India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 262–290.

Hilbig, B. E., & Thielmann, I. (2017). Does everyone have a price? On the role of payoff magnitude for ethical decision making. Cognition, 163, 15–25.

Ipsos, (2019). Global trust in professions: Who do global citizens trust? Retrieved Sept 2nd, 2020 from: https://www.ipsos.com/en/its-fact-scientists-are-most-trusted-people-world.

Jiang, T. (2013). Cheating in mind games: The subtlety of rules matters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 328–336.

Kajackaite, A., & Gneezy, U. (2017). Incentives and cheating. Games and Economic Behavior, 102, 433–444.

Kocher, M. G., Schudy, S., & Spantig, L. (2018). I lie? We lie! Why? Experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups. Management Science, 64(9), 3995–4008.

Lohse, T., Simon, S. A., & Konrad, K. A. (2018). Deception under time pressure: Conscious decision or a problem of awareness? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 146, 31–42.

McGuire, M., Pratt, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1991). Paying to improve your chances: Gambling or insurance? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 329–338.

Mol, J. M., van der Heijden, E. C. M., & Potters, J. J. M. (2020). (Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer. Experimental Economics, 23, 961–978.

Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgement and Decision Making, 6(8), 771–781.

Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions. (2018). Trust in Professions 2018. Retrieved Sept 2nd, 2020 from: https://www.nim.org/sites/default/files/medien/135/dokumente/2018_-_trust_in_professions_-_englisch.pdf.

Potters, J., & Stoop, J. (2016). Do cheaters in the lab also cheat in the field? European Economic Review, 87, 26–33.

Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225–243.

Schindler, S., & Pfattheicher, S. (2017). The frame of the game: Loss-framing increases dishonest behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 172–177.

Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperimentes. In H. Sauermann (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung (pp. 136–168). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Shalvi, S., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). Ethical manoeuvring: Why people avoid both major and minor lies. British Journal of Management, 22, 16–27.

Simon, S. A. (2020). Reporting under Ignorance – Is it a lie if I don’t know?, Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2020-12.

van de Ven, J., & Villeval, M. C. (2015). Dishonesty under scrutiny. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 86–99.

Vranceanu, R., & Dubart, D. (2019). Deceitful communication in a sender-receiver experiment: Does everyone have a price? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 79, 43–52.