Payments for watershed services: Directing incentives for improving lake basin governance
Tóm tắt
This study introduces the emerging integrated ecosystem management approach known as Payments for Watershed Services (PWS) as utilized for lake and reservoir basin governance. PWS is built on the central concept of providing economic incentives to watershed stakeholders to assist in management efforts. It channels conservation payments from downstream payers to finance conservation activities conducted by upstream payees. The upstream conservation activities are expected to enhance ecosystem functions, thereby improving water‐related ecosystem services desired by downstream stakeholders. Information on 163 PWS projects in 34 developing countries through the year 2008 was collected and analysed, including their common goals, processes, outcomes, scientific assumptions and socioeconomic rationales. This study recognized one unique PWS characteristic, namely the role of intermediary organizations (i.e. brokers) in integrating the economic incentives of upstream payees and downstream payers in order to facilitate their transactions by means of contracts. Although 75% of the reviewed PWS projects have focused on rivers, and only 10% have considered lakes and reservoirs, the similarity of the intermediary functions performed by lake management organizations and PWS intermediary organizations suggests a greater potential for the future application of PWS designs in lake basins. Drawing on components in the field of New Institutional Economics to interpret the intermediary function within the PWS framework, a three‐part PWS design with 15 steps is proposed in this study for lake basin governance, with a Costa Rican PWS scheme serving as an illustration. This study seeks to communicate the scientific and socioeconomic frontiers for developing locally suitable and integrated watershed governance structures to lake management organizations and other watershed stakeholder groups.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agarwal C., 2007, Fair Deals for Watershed Services in India
Alchian A. A., 1972, Production, information costs, and economic organization, Am. Econ. Rev., 62, 772
Allen D. W., 1999, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 893
Arocena‐Francisco H., 2003, Environmental Service “Payments”: Experiences, Constraints and Potential in the Philippines
Arrow K. J., 1963, Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care, Am. Econ. Rev., 53, 941
Asquith N., 2007, Fair Deals for Watershed Services in Bolivia
BarrantesG.&GamezL.(2007)Programa de Pago por Servicio Ambiental Hídrico de la Empresa de Servicios Públicos de Heredia. Paper prepared for Ecomarkets: Costa Rica’s Experience with Payments for Environmental Services. Available from URL:http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEEI/Resources/CostaRica‐14‐Heredia.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2012.
Blignaut J., 2008, South Africa: An Inventory of Current and Potential Projects and Markets for Payments for Ecosystem Services
Bracer C., 2007, Organization and Governance for Fostering Pro‐Poor Compensation for Environmental Services
CANARI(2002)Who pays for water?Caribbean Natural Resources Institute (CANARI). Available from URL:http://www.canari.org/conceptnote.doc. Accessed 16 Aug 2012.
CCICED, 2006, Eco‐compensation Mechanisms and Policies in China
Chandler A. D., 1962, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise
Chavarria V., 1998, Cantón de Barva de Heredia. Programa de Recuperación de la Parte Alta de la Cuenca del Río Segundo
Chiotha D., 2008, Potential Payment for Ecosystem Service (PES) in Malawi
Chomitz K. M., 1998, Financing Environmental Services: The Costa Rican Experience
FAO, 2004, Payment Schemes for Environmental Services in Watersheds
Forest Trends, 2007, Getting Started: An Introductory Primer to Assessing & Developing Payments for Ecosystem Service Deals
Gutman P., 2003, From Goodwill to Payments for Environmental Services: A Survey of Financing Options for Sustainable Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries
HartmannJ.&PetersonL.(2004)“Marketing” environmental services: lessons learned in German development cooperation. Paper presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference of The International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP) Oaxaca Mexico 9‐13 August 2004. Available from URL:http://www.infoandina.org/system/files/recursos/marketing_PSA.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2012.
Hayek F. A., 1945, The use of knowledge in society, Am. Econ. Rev., 35, 519
Huang M., 2007, Watershed‐based Payment for Environmental Services in Asia
King N., 2008, Fair Deals for Watershed Services in South Africa
Klein P. G., 1999, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 456
KosoyN. Martínez‐TunaM. MuradianR.&Martínez‐AlierJ.(2007)Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America.Ecol. Econ.61(2–3) 446–55.
Landell‐Mills N., 2002, Silver Bullet or Fool’s Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impacts on the Poor
Leimona B., 2007, Developing Mechanisms to Reward the Upland Poor in Asia for Environmental Services That They Provide (RUPES)
Macneil I. R., 1978, Contracts: adjustments of long‐term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law, Northwest U. Law Rev., 72, 854
MayrandK.&PaquinM.(2004)Payments for environmental services: a survey and assessment of current schemes. Paper prepared for the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America.Unisfera International Centre Montreal.
McIntosh S., 2007, Fair Deals for Watershed Services in the Caribbean
Miranda M., 2003, The Social Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica: A Quantitative Field Survey and Analysis of the Virilla Watershed
Mwangi S., 2008, Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in East and Southern Africa: Assessing Prospects & Pathways Forward
van Noordwijk M., 2004, An Introduction to the Conceptual Basis of RUPES: Rewarding Upland Poor for the Environmental Services They Provide
Porras I. T., 2006, Markets for Watershed Services – Country Profiles
Porras I. T., 2012, Markets for Watershed Services ‐ Country Profiles
Porras I. T., 2008, All That Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries
Randimby N., 2008, An Inventory of Initiatives/Activities and Legislation Pertaining to Ecosystem Service Payment Schemes (PES) in Madagascar
Ruhweza A., 2008, An Inventory of PES Schemes in Uganda
Scurrah‐Ehrhart C., 2006, Tanzania: Inventory of Payments for Ecosystem Services
Shilling J. D., 2003, Paying for Environmental Stewardship Using Markets and Common‐Pool Property to Reduce Rural Poverty While Enhancing Conservation
Simon H. A., 1947, Administrative Behavior
Southgate D., 2007, Paying for Watershed Services in Latin America: A Review of Current Initiatives
Swallow B., 2007, The Conditions for Effective Mechanisms of Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services: CES Scoping Study
Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2009, Scientific Background on the 2009 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel: Economic Governance
USAID, 2007, Lessons and Best Practices for Pro‐poor Payment for Ecosystem Services
Vega F., 1998, Factores Relevantes Para Orientar un Plan de Manejo en Cuenca del Río Virilla
Williamson O. E., 1971, Vertical integration of production: market failure considerations, Am. Econ. Rev., 61, 112
Williamson O. E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting
Wunder S., 2005, Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts