Patterns and magnitude of flow alteration in California, USA

Freshwater Biology - Tập 63 Số 8 - Trang 859-873 - 2018
Julie K. H. Zimmerman1, Daren M. Carlisle2, Jason T. May3, Kirk R. Klausmeyer4, Theodore E. Grantham5, Larry R. Brown3, Jeanette K. Howard4
1The Nature Conservancy, Sacramento, CA, USA
2National Water-Quality Assessment Program, US Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA
3California Water Science Center, US Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA, USA
4The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, CA, USA
5Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract Quantifying the natural flow regime is essential for management of water resources and conservation of aquatic ecosystems. Understanding the degree to which anthropogenic activities have altered flows is critical for developing effective conservation strategies. Assessing flow alteration requires estimates of flows expected in the absence of human influence and under current land use and water management. There are several techniques to predict flows in streams and rivers; however, none have been applied to make predictions of natural flow conditions over large regions and time periods. We utilised machine learning statistical models to predict natural monthly flows (natural streamflows without the influence of water management or anthropogenic land use) in California from 1950 to 2015, using time‐dependent and fixed watershed variables from reference stream gages. These models were then used to make estimates of mean, maximum and minimum monthly flows in all streams in the state. We compared observed flows measured at 540 stream gages across the state with expected natural flows at the same locations, to quantify the type, frequency and magnitude of flow alteration over the past 20 years (1996–2015). A gage was considered altered if an observed flow metric (monthly mean, annual maximum, annual minimum) fell outside the 80% prediction interval of the modelled flow estimate. We found that 95% of the 540 stream gages in California had at least 1 month of altered flows over the past 20 years, and 11% of gages were frequently altered (over two‐thirds of the months recorded had evidence of altered flows). The type of alteration varied across the state with flows being either depleted, inflated or a mix of both at different times of the year. Most altered gages (68%) exhibited both depletion and inflation in monthly flows over the time period. Inflation of monthly mean flows was most prevalent during the summer months, while depletion of monthly flows was evident throughout the year. Type, frequency and magnitude of flow alteration varied by region. Flow depletion was present at >80% of gages in the North Coast and Central Coast, flow inflation was measured at >80% of gages in the South Coast and San Francisco Bay and both depletion and inflation were evident at >80% of gages in the Sacramento River and San Joaquin and Tulare regions. Annual maximum flows were consistently depleted and annual minimum flows were commonly inflated in the Sierra Nevada and Central Valley (Sacramento River and San Joaquin and Tulare regions). This is the first study to comprehensively assess flow alteration at stream gages across California. Understanding the patterns and degree of alteration can aid in prioritising streams for environmental flow assessment and developing conservation strategies for native freshwater biota.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2

10.1071/MF11128

10.1023/A:1007660914155

10.1002/rra.1293

10.1002/rra.673

10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0

Ca. Dept. of Water Resources. (2013).California water plan update 2013. Retrieved July 10 2017 fromhttp://www.water.ca.gov/waterplan/cwpu2013/final/index.cfm

Ca. Dept. of Water Resources. (2017).California data exchange center. Retrieved July 28 2017 fromhttp://cdec.water.ca.gov/cgi-progs/iodir/wsihist

10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5

10.1002/rra.1247

10.1002/eco.1703

10.3133/ofr20161189

10.1890/100053

10.1890/07-0539.1

10.1002/joc.1688

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00546.x

10.1086/694912

Falcone J. A.(2015).U.S. conterminous wall‐to‐wall anthropogenic land use trends (NWALT) 1974–2012 (Data Series 948). US Geological Survey National Water‐Quality Assessment Program. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.3133/ds948

10.1890/09-0889.1

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.51

10.1093/biosci/biu159

Hanak E., 2011, Managing California's water: From conflict to reconciliation

10.1002/2016GL071665

10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.013

10.1899/12-009.1

Horizon Systems. (2015).National hydrography dataset plus: Horizon Systems Corporation. Retrieved June 1 2015 fromhttp://www.horizon-systems.com/nhdplus/

Howard J. K., 2015, California freshwater blueprint: Phase I overview

Kendy E., 2012, A practical guide for environmental flows for policy and planning

10.1890/11-0480.1

10.1016/S0928-2025(05)80017-3

10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02024.x

10.1002/rra.1524

10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01837.x

10.1111/1752-1688.12504

Liaw A. &Wiener M.(2015).Package “randomForest”. Retrieved fromftp://ie.freshrpms.net/pub/CRAN/web/packages/randomForest/randomForest.pdf

10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.08.017

10.1029/2011WR010630

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb05530.x

10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01850.x

10.13031/2013.23153

10.1073/pnas.0701457104

10.1890/130076

10.1002/rra.700

10.1899/12-113.1

10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x

10.2307/1313099

10.1073/pnas.0609812104

10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x

10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x

10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0807:REOHAO]2.0.CO;2

R Core Team, 2016, R: A language and environment for statistical computing

10.1899/04-022.1

10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1267:SEFTEC]2.0.CO;2

10.1126/science.285.5431.1199

10.1186/1471-2105-8-25

University Center for Atmospheric Research. (2017).PRISM high‐resolution spatial climate data for the United States. Retrieved February 15 2017 fromhttps://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/prism-high-resolution-spatial-climate-data-united-states-maxmin-temp-dewpoint

US Environmental Protection Agency. (2015).Level III and IV ecoregions of the continental United States. Retrieved February 28 2017 fromhttps://www.epa.gov/eco-research/level-iii-and-iv-ecoregions-continental-united-states

US Geological Survey. (2016).National water information system—web interface. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.5066/f7p55kjn

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00038.x

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.015

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:4(270)

10.1093/biosci/biv102

10.1111/fme.12063

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Freshwater Biology

Tập 63 Số 8

859-873

Thông tin tác giả