Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bartnikowski, 2017, Modulation of fixation stiffness from flexible to stiff in a rat model of bone healing, Acta Orthop., 88, 217, 10.1080/17453674.2016.1256940
Claes, 1998, Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., S132, 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00015
Knitschke, 2022, Osseous union after mandible reconstruction with fibula free flap using manually bent plates vs. Patient-specific implants: a retrospective analysis of 89 patients, Curr. Oncol., 29, 3375, 10.3390/curroncol29050274
Knitschke, 2022, Osseous union after jaw reconstruction with fibula-free flap: conventional vs. CAD/CAM patient-specific implants, Cancers, 14, 10.3390/cancers14235774
Komisar, 1985, The use of osteosynthesis in immediate and delayed mandibular reconstruction, Laryngoscope, 95, 1363, 10.1288/00005537-198511000-00014
Kreutzer, 2022, Patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates for free flap fixation at the mandible: a feasibility study, Front. Surg., 9, 10.3389/fsurg.2022.778371
Kreutzer, 2022, Removal of patient-specific reconstruction plates after mandible reconstruction with a fibula free flap: is the plate the problem?, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 51, 182, 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.04.003
Lang, 2021, Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen, PLoS One, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0253002
Lee, 2015, Outcomes of microvascular free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis: a systematic review, J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg., 43, 2026, 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.006
Linsen, 2018, Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction, Clin. Oral Investig., 22, 1707, 10.1007/s00784-017-2263-3
Liu, 2017, A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis, Biomed. Eng. Online, 16, 131, 10.1186/s12938-017-0422-z
Lommen, 2022, Reduction of CT artifacts using polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), and polyethylene (PE) reconstruction plates in oral oncology, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 80, 1272, 10.1016/j.joms.2022.03.004
Lovald, 2009, Biomechanical optimization of bone plates used in rigid fixation of mandibular fractures, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 67, 973, 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.032
Martola, 2007, Fracture of titanium plates used for mandibular reconstruction following ablative tumor surgery, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 80, 345, 10.1002/jbm.b.30603
Maurer, 2006, [Computer assisted chewing power in patients with segmental resection of the mandible], Mund-, Kiefer- Gesichtschirurgie, 10, 37, 10.1007/s10006-005-0656-y
Mavčič, 2012, Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy, Int. Orthop., 36, 689, 10.1007/s00264-012-1487-8
Möllmann, 2021, Comparison of the accuracy and clinical parameters of patient-specific and conventionally bended plates for mandibular reconstruction, Front. Oncol., 11, 10.3389/fonc.2021.719028
Narra, 2014, Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy, J. Biomech., 47, 264, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.016
Rendenbach, 2018, Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T, Dentomaxillofacial Radiol., 47, 20170361, 10.1259/dmfr.20170361
Rendenbach, 2017, CAD-CAM plates versus conventional fixation plates for primary mandibular reconstruction: a biomechanical in vitro analysis, J. Cranio-Maxillo-Fac. Surg., 45, 1878, 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.08.024
Rendenbach, 2019, Complication rates and clinical outcomes of osseous free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional fixation in 128 patients, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 48, 1156, 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.029
Rendenbach, 2019, Patient specific glass fiber reinforced composite versus titanium plate: a comparative biomechanical analysis under cyclic dynamic loading, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 91, 212, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.014
Ritschl, 2021, Retrospective analysis of complications in 190 mandibular resections and simultaneous reconstructions with free fibula flap, iliac crest flap or reconstruction plate: a comparative single centre study, Clin. Oral Investig., 25, 2905, 10.1007/s00784-020-03607-8
Robey, 2008, Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in fibular flap reconstruction of the mandible, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 122, 1733, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9ac5
Ruf, 2022, Towards mechanobiologically optimized mandible reconstruction: CAD/CAM miniplates vs. reconstruction plates for fibula free flap fixation: a finite element study, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10, 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005022
Schupp, 2007, Biomechanical testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental resection of the mandible, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 65, 924, 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.306
Shaw, 2004, Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction, Head Neck, 26, 456, 10.1002/hed.10343
Shetty, 1995, Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 53, 791, 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90335-6
Smeets, 2017, Artefacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study, Dentomaxillofacial Radiol., 46, 10.1259/dmfr.20160267
Steffen, 2022
Steffen, 2020, Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro, J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 121, 377, 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.001
Steffen, 2020, Biomechanical comparison of titanium miniplates versus a variety of CAD/CAM plates in mandibular reconstruction, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104007
Trainotti, 2014, Locking versus nonlocking plates in mandibular reconstruction with fibular graft--a biomechanical ex vivo study, Clin Oral Investig, 18, 1291, 10.1007/s00784-013-1105-1
Troeltzsch, 2021, Detectability of head and neck cancer via new computed tomography reconstruction tools including iterative reconstruction and metal artifact reduction, Diagnostics, 11, 10.3390/diagnostics11112154
Tsukada, 2013, Locking versus non-locking neutralization plates for treatment of lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized controlled trial, Int. Orthop., 37, 2451, 10.1007/s00264-013-2109-9
Wang, 2020, Biodegradable magnesium-based implants in orthopedics-A general review and perspectives, Adv. Sci., 7
Wilde, 2015, Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction, Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., 10, 2035, 10.1007/s11548-015-1193-2
Yang, 2021, Three-dimensionally printed patient-specific surgical plates increase accuracy of oncologic head and neck reconstruction versus conventional surgical plates: a comparative study, Ann. Surg Oncol., 28, 363, 10.1245/s10434-020-08732-y