Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction

Claudius Steffen1, Kay Sellenschloh2, Magdalena Willsch2, Ana Prates Soares1,3, Michael M. Morlock2, Max Heiland1, Kilian Kreutzer1, Gerd Huber2, Carsten Rendenbach1
1Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
2Institute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestraße 15, 21703, Hamburg, Germany
3Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bartnikowski, 2017, Modulation of fixation stiffness from flexible to stiff in a rat model of bone healing, Acta Orthop., 88, 217, 10.1080/17453674.2016.1256940 Claes, 1998, Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., S132, 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00015 Knitschke, 2022, Osseous union after mandible reconstruction with fibula free flap using manually bent plates vs. Patient-specific implants: a retrospective analysis of 89 patients, Curr. Oncol., 29, 3375, 10.3390/curroncol29050274 Knitschke, 2022, Osseous union after jaw reconstruction with fibula-free flap: conventional vs. CAD/CAM patient-specific implants, Cancers, 14, 10.3390/cancers14235774 Komisar, 1985, The use of osteosynthesis in immediate and delayed mandibular reconstruction, Laryngoscope, 95, 1363, 10.1288/00005537-198511000-00014 Kreutzer, 2022, Patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates for free flap fixation at the mandible: a feasibility study, Front. Surg., 9, 10.3389/fsurg.2022.778371 Kreutzer, 2022, Removal of patient-specific reconstruction plates after mandible reconstruction with a fibula free flap: is the plate the problem?, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 51, 182, 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.04.003 Lang, 2021, Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen, PLoS One, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0253002 Lee, 2015, Outcomes of microvascular free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis: a systematic review, J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg., 43, 2026, 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.006 Linsen, 2018, Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction, Clin. Oral Investig., 22, 1707, 10.1007/s00784-017-2263-3 Liu, 2017, A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis, Biomed. Eng. Online, 16, 131, 10.1186/s12938-017-0422-z Lommen, 2022, Reduction of CT artifacts using polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), and polyethylene (PE) reconstruction plates in oral oncology, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 80, 1272, 10.1016/j.joms.2022.03.004 Lovald, 2009, Biomechanical optimization of bone plates used in rigid fixation of mandibular fractures, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 67, 973, 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.032 Martola, 2007, Fracture of titanium plates used for mandibular reconstruction following ablative tumor surgery, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 80, 345, 10.1002/jbm.b.30603 Maurer, 2006, [Computer assisted chewing power in patients with segmental resection of the mandible], Mund-, Kiefer- Gesichtschirurgie, 10, 37, 10.1007/s10006-005-0656-y Mavčič, 2012, Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy, Int. Orthop., 36, 689, 10.1007/s00264-012-1487-8 Möllmann, 2021, Comparison of the accuracy and clinical parameters of patient-specific and conventionally bended plates for mandibular reconstruction, Front. Oncol., 11, 10.3389/fonc.2021.719028 Narra, 2014, Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy, J. Biomech., 47, 264, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.016 Rendenbach, 2018, Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T, Dentomaxillofacial Radiol., 47, 20170361, 10.1259/dmfr.20170361 Rendenbach, 2017, CAD-CAM plates versus conventional fixation plates for primary mandibular reconstruction: a biomechanical in vitro analysis, J. Cranio-Maxillo-Fac. Surg., 45, 1878, 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.08.024 Rendenbach, 2019, Complication rates and clinical outcomes of osseous free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional fixation in 128 patients, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 48, 1156, 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.029 Rendenbach, 2019, Patient specific glass fiber reinforced composite versus titanium plate: a comparative biomechanical analysis under cyclic dynamic loading, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 91, 212, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.014 Ritschl, 2021, Retrospective analysis of complications in 190 mandibular resections and simultaneous reconstructions with free fibula flap, iliac crest flap or reconstruction plate: a comparative single centre study, Clin. Oral Investig., 25, 2905, 10.1007/s00784-020-03607-8 Robey, 2008, Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in fibular flap reconstruction of the mandible, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 122, 1733, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9ac5 Ruf, 2022, Towards mechanobiologically optimized mandible reconstruction: CAD/CAM miniplates vs. reconstruction plates for fibula free flap fixation: a finite element study, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10, 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005022 Schupp, 2007, Biomechanical testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental resection of the mandible, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 65, 924, 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.306 Shaw, 2004, Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction, Head Neck, 26, 456, 10.1002/hed.10343 Shetty, 1995, Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 53, 791, 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90335-6 Smeets, 2017, Artefacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study, Dentomaxillofacial Radiol., 46, 10.1259/dmfr.20160267 Steffen, 2022 Steffen, 2020, Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro, J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 121, 377, 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.001 Steffen, 2020, Biomechanical comparison of titanium miniplates versus a variety of CAD/CAM plates in mandibular reconstruction, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104007 Trainotti, 2014, Locking versus nonlocking plates in mandibular reconstruction with fibular graft--a biomechanical ex vivo study, Clin Oral Investig, 18, 1291, 10.1007/s00784-013-1105-1 Troeltzsch, 2021, Detectability of head and neck cancer via new computed tomography reconstruction tools including iterative reconstruction and metal artifact reduction, Diagnostics, 11, 10.3390/diagnostics11112154 Tsukada, 2013, Locking versus non-locking neutralization plates for treatment of lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized controlled trial, Int. Orthop., 37, 2451, 10.1007/s00264-013-2109-9 Wang, 2020, Biodegradable magnesium-based implants in orthopedics-A general review and perspectives, Adv. Sci., 7 Wilde, 2015, Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction, Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., 10, 2035, 10.1007/s11548-015-1193-2 Yang, 2021, Three-dimensionally printed patient-specific surgical plates increase accuracy of oncologic head and neck reconstruction versus conventional surgical plates: a comparative study, Ann. Surg Oncol., 28, 363, 10.1245/s10434-020-08732-y