Patient and general public attitudes towards clinical artificial intelligence: a mixed methods systematic review

Topol, 2019, High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence, Nat Med, 25, 44, 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 Young, 2020, Artificial intelligence in dermatology: a primer, J Invest Dermatol, 140, 1504, 10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.026 Bystritsky, 2020, Machine learning for the prediction of antimicrobial stewardship intervention in hospitalized patients receiving broad-spectrum agents, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 41, 1022, 10.1017/ice.2020.213 Nagendran, 2020, Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies in medical imaging, BMJ, 368, m689, 10.1136/bmj.m689 Benjamens, 2020, The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database, NPJ Digit Med, 3, 118, 10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0 He, 2019, The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine, Nat Med, 25, 30, 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 Young, 2021, Stress testing reveals gaps in clinic readiness of image-based diagnostic artificial intelligence models, NPJ Digit Med, 4, 10, 10.1038/s41746-020-00380-6 Liu, 2019, Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed, Nat Med, 25, 1467, 10.1038/s41591-019-0603-3 Cruz Rivera, 2020, Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension, Nat Med, 26, 1351, 10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7 Zhang, 2019, Factors influencing patients' intention to use diabetes management apps based on an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model: web-based survey, J Med Internet Res, 21, 10.2196/15023 Moher, 2009, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Med, 6, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Bally, 2018, Closed-loop insulin delivery for glycemic control in noncritical care, N Engl J Med, 379, 547, 10.1056/NEJMoa1805233 Ouzzani, 2016, Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews, Syst Rev, 5, 210, 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 Ongena, 2020, Patients' views on the implementation of artificial intelligence in radiology: development and validation of a standardized questionnaire, Eur Radiol, 30, 1033, 10.1007/s00330-019-06486-0 Tran, 2019, Patients' views of wearable devices and AI in healthcare: findings from the ComPaRe e-cohort, NPJ Digit Med, 2, 1, 10.1038/s41746-019-0132-y Esmaeilzadeh, 2020, Use of AI-based tools for healthcare purposes: a survey study from consumers' perspectives, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 20, 170, 10.1186/s12911-020-01191-1 Hong, 2018, The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers, Educ Inf, 34, 285 Hong, 2017, Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence, Syst Rev, 6, 61, 10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2 Thomas, 2008, Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews, BMC Med Res Methodol, 8, 45, 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 Nelson, 2020, Patient perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence for skin cancer screening: a qualitative study, JAMA Dermatol, 156, 501, 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.5014 Adams, 2020, Patient perspectives and priorities regarding artificial intelligence in radiology: opportunities for patient-centered radiology, J Am Coll Radiol, 17, 1034, 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.007 Bala, 2020, Patient perception of plain-language medical notes generated using artificial intelligence software: pilot mixed-methods study, JMIR Form Res, 4, 10.2196/16670 Gao, 2020, Public perception of artificial intelligence in medical care: content analysis of social media, J Med Internet Res, 22, 10.2196/16649 Haan, 2019, A qualitative study to understand patient perspective on the use of artificial intelligence in radiology, J Am Coll Radiol, 16, 1416, 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.043 Juravle, 2020, Trust in artificial intelligence for medical diagnoses, Prog Brain Res, 253, 263, 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.006 Jutzi, 2020, Artificial intelligence in skin cancer diagnostics: the patients' perspective, Front Med (Lausanne), 7, 233, 10.3389/fmed.2020.00233 Keel, 2018, Feasibility and patient acceptability of a novel artificial intelligence-based screening model for diabetic retinopathy at endocrinology outpatient services: a pilot study, Sci Rep, 8, 10.1038/s41598-018-22612-2 Meyer, 2020, Patient perspectives on the usefulness of an artificial intelligence-assisted symptom checker: cross-sectional survey study, J Med Internet Res, 22, 10.2196/14679 Miller, 2020, Patients' utilization and perception of an artificial intelligence-based symptom assessment and advice technology in a British primary care waiting room: exploratory pilot study, JMIR Human Factors, 7, 10.2196/19713 Nadarzynski, 2020, Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled chatbots, video consultations and live webchats as online platforms for sexual health advice, BMJ Sex Reprod Health, 46, 210, 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200271 Nadarzynski, 2019, Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: a mixed-methods study, Digit Health, 5 Palmisciano, 2020, Attitudes of patients and their relatives toward artificial intelligence in neurosurgery, World Neurosurg, 138, e627, 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.029 Rawson, 2019, Public acceptability of computer-controlled antibiotic management: an exploration of automated dosing and opportunities for implementation, J Infect, 78, 75, 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.005 Spänig, 2019, The virtual doctor: an interactive clinical-decision-support system based on deep learning for non-invasive prediction of diabetes, Artif Intell Med, 100, 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101706 Stai, 2020, Public perceptions of artificial intelligence and robotics in medicine, J Endourol, 34, 1041, 10.1089/end.2020.0137 Sung J, Portales-Casamar E, Görges M. Perceptions of expert and lay users on trust in the use of artificial intelligence for medical decision-making and risk prediction. Society for Technology in Anesthesia 2020 Annual Meeting; Austin, TX; Jan 15–18, 2020 (abstr 23). Yang, 2019, Attitudes of Chinese cancer patients toward the clinical use of artificial intelligence, Patient Prefer Adherence, 13, 1867, 10.2147/PPA.S225952 Ye, 2019, Psychosocial factors affecting artificial intelligence adoption in health care in China: cross-sectional study, J Med Internet Res, 21, 10.2196/14316 Anderson Mitchell, 2019, The digital divide in health-related technology use: the significance of race/ethnicity, Gerontologist, 59, 6, 10.1093/geront/gny138 Purnell FitzGerald Perlmutter, 2020, Identification of patient perceptions that can affect the uptake of interventions using biometric monitoring devices: systematic review of randomized controlled trials, J Med Internet Res, 22, 10.2196/18986