Patient Preferences for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography versus Conventional Catheter Angiography for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

Achenbach, 2003, Clinical results of minimally invasive coronary angiography using computed tomography, Cardiol Clin, 21, 549, 10.1016/S0733-8651(03)00090-0 Salavati, 2012, Dual-source computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 6, 78, 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.018 Vavere, 2011, Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification–a subanalysis of the CORE-64 Trial, Radiology, 261, 100, 10.1148/radiol.11110537 Paech, 2011, A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of suspected coronary artery disease, BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 11, 32, 10.1186/1471-2261-11-32 Swan, 2000, A time-tradeoff method for cost-effectiveness models applied to radiology, Med Decis Making, 20, 79, 10.1177/0272989X0002000110 Lalonde, 2001, Health-related quality of life with coronary heart disease prevention and treatment, J Clin Epidemiol, 54, 1011, 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00361-4 Swan, 2003, Process utility for imaging in cerebrovascular disease, Acad Radiol, 10, 266, 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80100-9 Torrance, 1986, Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal, J Health Econ, 5, 1, 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2 Luce, 1996, Estimating costs in cost-effective analysis, 176 Swan, 2006, Process utility in breast biopsy, Med Decis Making, 26, 347, 10.1177/0272989X06290490 Schonenberger, 2007, Patient acceptance of noninvasive and invasive coronary angiography, PLoS One, 2, e246, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000246 Sandgaard, 2012, Patients' views of cardiac computed tomography angiography compared with conventional coronary angiography, J Thorac Imaging, 27, 36, 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182108091 Littenberg, 2003, Paper Standard Gamble: the reliability of a paper questionnaire to assess utility, Med Decis Making, 23, 480, 10.1177/0272989X03259817 Froberg, 1989, Methodology for measuring health-state preferences–II: scaling methods, J Clin Epidemiol, 42, 459, 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90136-4 Dyer, 2010, A review of health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cardiovascular disease, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 8, 13, 10.1186/1477-7525-8-13 Griffin, 2007, Cost effectiveness of clinically appropriate decisions on alternative treatments for angina pectoris: prospective observational study, BMJ, 334, 624, 10.1136/bmj.39129.442164.55 Sharples, 2007, Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. The CECaT trial, Health Technol Assess, 11, 10.3310/hta11490 Morimoto, 2002, Utilities measured by rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble: review and reference for health care professionals, J Epidemiol, 12, 160