Pathways to commitment in living-apart-together relationships in the Netherlands: A study on satisfaction, alternatives, investments and social support

Advances in Life Course Research - Tập 36 - Trang 13-22 - 2018
Roselinde van der Wiel1, Clara H. Mulder1, Ajay Bailey2
1University of Groningen, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Population Research Centre, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
2Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agnew, 2009, Commitment, theories and typologies, Vol. 1, 245 Asendorpf, 2008, Living apart together: Alters- und kohortenabhängigkeit einer heterogenen lebensform, Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 60, 749, 10.1007/s11577-008-0035-4 Bawin-Legros, 2001, Regulation of intimacy and love semantics in couples living apart together, International Review of Sociology, 11, 39, 10.1080/03906700020030983 Berrington, 2015, Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK, Demographic Research, S17, 327, 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.12 Burgoyne, 2010, Marital commitment, money and marriage preparation: What changes after the wedding?, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20, 390, 10.1002/casp.1045 Carter, 2015, Sex, love and security: Accounts of distance and commitment in living apart together relationships, Sociology, 50, 576, 10.1177/0038038515573689 Castro-Martín, 2008, Not truly partnerless: Non-residential partnerships and retreat from marriage in Spain, Demographic Research, 18, 443, 10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.16 Cherlin, 2004, The deinstitutionalization of American marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848, 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x De Jong Gierveld, 2002, The dilemma of repartnering: Considerations of older men and women entering new intimate relationships in later life, Ageing International, 27, 61, 10.1007/s12126-002-1015-z De Jong Gierveld, 2004, Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: Partner relationships following bereavement or divorce, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 236, 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00015.x De Jong Gierveld, 2008, Incidentie en achtergronden van transitionele en duurzame latrelaties, Bevolkingstrends, 56, 2 De Jong Gierveld, 2013, Parents' partnership decision making after divorce or widowhood: The role of (step)children, Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1098, 10.1111/jomf.12061 Duncan, 2011, People who live apart together (LATs): New family form or just a stage?, International Review of Sociology, 21, 513, 10.1080/03906701.2011.625660 Duncan, 2008, New families? Tradition and change in modern relationships Duncan, 2010, People who live apart together (LATs) — How different are they?, The Sociological Review, 58, 112, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01874.x Duncan, 2005, Why don’t they marry? Cohabitation, commitment and DIY marriage, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 17, 383 Duncan, 2013, Why do people live apart together?, Families, Relationships and Societies, 2, 323, 10.1332/204674313X673419 Duncan, 2014, Practices and perceptions of living apart together, Family Science, 5, 1, 10.1080/19424620.2014.927382 Ermisch, 2000 Esping-Andersen, 2013 Etcheverry, 2004, Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate, Personal Relationships, 11, 409, 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00090.x Felling, 2000 Giddens, 1991 Goodfriend, 2008, Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1639, 10.1177/0146167208323743 Hantrais, 2006, Living as a family in europe, 117 Haskey, 2005, Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: Having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and living apart together (LAT), Population Trends, 122, 35 Haskey, 2006, Living-apart-together in Britain: Context and meaning, International Journal of Law in Context, 2, 37, 10.1017/S1744552306001030 Hennink, 2011 Hiekel, 2015, Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment: Dutch focus group research on views on cohabitation and marriage, Demographic Research, S17, 311 Jamieson, 2002, Cohabitation and commitment: Partnership plans of young men and women, The Sociological Review, 50, 356, 10.1111/1467-954X.00387 Jamison, 2011, We’re not living together: Stayover relationships among college-educated emerging adults, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 536, 10.1177/0265407510384897 Johnson, 1999, The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married, Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 160, 10.2307/353891 Kamp Dush, 2005, Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607, 10.1177/0265407505056438 Krapf, 2017, Moving in or breaking up? The role of distance in the development of romantic relationships, European Journal of Population, 1 Latten, 2014, Partner relationships in the Netherlands: New manifestations of the second demographic transition, Genus, 69 Lesthaeghe, 2010, The unfolding story of the second demographic transition, Population and Development Review, 36, 211, 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x Levin, 2004, Living apart together: A new family form, Current Sociology, 52, 223, 10.1177/0011392104041809 Levin, 1999, Living apart together, Community, Work & Family, 2, 279, 10.1080/13668809908412186 Lewin, 2017, Health and relationship quality later in life: A comparison of living apart together (LAT), first marriages, remarriages, and cohabitation, Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1754, 10.1177/0192513X16647982 Lewin, 2017, Intentions to live together among couples living apart: Differences by age and gender, European Journal of Population, 1 Liefbroer, 2015, Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe, Demographic Research, 32, 251, 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.8 Lodewijckx, 2011 Otten, 2015, Latrelaties in Nederland, Bevolkingstrends, 14, 2 Perelli-Harris, 2014, Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia, Demographic Research, 17, 1043, 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34 Perelli-Harris, 2017, The rise in divorce and cohabitation: Is there a link?, Population and Development Review, 43, 303, 10.1111/padr.12063 Régnier-Loilier, 2009, Neither single, nor in a couple. A study of living apart together in France, Demographic Research, 21, 75, 10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.4 Reimondos, 2011, Living-apart-together (LAT) relationships in Australia, Family Matters, 87, 43 Roseneil, 2006, On not living with a partner: Unpicking coupledom and cohabitation, Sociological Research Online, 11, 10.5153/sro.1413 Rusbult, 1980, Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172, 10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4 Rusbult, 1983, A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101, 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101 Rusbult, 2011 Sprecher, 1988, Investment model, equity, and social support determinants of relationship commitment, Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318, 10.2307/2786759 Strohm, 2009, Living apart together relationships in the United States, Demographic Research, 21, 177, 10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.7 Tai, 2014, Do coresidence and intentions make a difference? relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries, Demographic Research, 19, 71, 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.3 Upton-Davis, 2015, Subverting gendered norms of cohabitation: Living apart together for women over 45, Journal of Gender Studies, 24, 104, 10.1080/09589236.2013.861346 Van der Klis, 2008, Beyond the trailing spouse: The commuter partnership as an alternative to family migration, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23, 1, 10.1007/s10901-007-9096-3