Patenting Strategy of Entrepreneurial Orientated Firms in New Zealand
Tóm tắt
Patenting is regarded as an important area for firms wanting to capture the strategic value of intellectual property. Further, patents are often used as a proxy for innovation— i.e., a firm with a large number of patents is said to be innovative. At the same time, a firm that is innovative is also said to have an entrepreneurial orientation (EO). In spite of this apparent linkage between an EO and patenting, little empirical evidence strategically links the two constructs. This paper addresses this gap by providing one of the first studies examining the relationship between an EO and patenting.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersson, S. 2000. The internationalization of the firm from an entrepreneurial perspective. International Studies of Management and Organization, 30(1): 63–92.
Arndt, J. 1979. Towards a concept of domesticated markets. Journal of Marketing, 43(4): 69–75.
Atuahene-Gima, K. & Ko, A. 2001. An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1): 54–74.
Becherer, R.C. & Maurer, J.G. 1997. The moderating effect of environmental variables on the entrepreneurial and marketing orientation of entrepreneur-led firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(1): 47–58.
Berthon, P, L., Hulbert, M. & Pitt, L.F. 1999. To serve or create? Strategic orientations toward customers and innovation. California Management Review, 42: 37–58.
Berkowitz, L. 1993. Getting the most from your patents. Research Technology Management, 32(2): 26–28.
Borch, F.J. 1957. The marketing philosophy as a way of business life. In The marketing concept: Its meaning to management: Marketing Series No 99. New York: American Management Association.
Carayannis, E.G. & Alexander, J. 1999. The wealth of knowledge: converting intellectual property to intellectual capital in co-operative research and technology management settings. Journal of Technology Management, 18(3/4): 326–352.
Christensen, C.M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Conner, K.R. 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1): 121–154.
Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. 1986. The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA.: Babson College, pp. 628–639.
Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments’. Strategic Management Journal, 10(January): 75–87.
Covin, J.G., & Miles, M.P. 1999. Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3): 47–63.
Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J. & Lane, P.J. 2003. Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3): 351–378.
Ernst & Young. 2003. Id New Zealand: The NZ Venture Capital Monitor 2002. Auckland, NZ.
EIU Views Wire. 2004. New Zealand: Licensing and Intellectual Property. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd, July 8.
Fernandez, E., Montes, J.M. & Vázquez, C.J. 2000. Typology and strategic analysis of intangible resources: A resource-based approach. Technovation, 20: 81–92.
Foxall, G. 1984. Corporate innovation: Marketing and strategy.New York: St. Martins Press.
Frederick, H.H. & Carswell, P.J. 2001. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: New Zealand 2001. Auckland: New Zealand Centre for Innovation & Entrepreneurship.
Ginsberg, A. 1985. Measuring changes in entrepreneurial orientation following industry deregulation: The development of a diagnostic instrument. in Proceedings of the First Biannual Conference of the U.S. Affiliate of the International Council for Small Business.
Global Insight. 2004. Venture impact 2004: Venture capital benefits to the U.S. economy. Arlington, VA: National Venture Capital Association.
Hall, R. 1992. The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 135–144.
Hamel, G. 2000. Leading the revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Harvey, M. & Lusch, R. 1997. Protecting the core competencies of a company: intangible asset security. European Journal of Management, 15(4): 370-380.
Hicks, L.L. & Holbein, L.R. 1997. Convergence of national intellectual property norms in international trading agreements. American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 12 769.
Houston, F.S. 1986. The marketing concept: What it is and what it is not. Journal of Marketing, 50(April): 81–87.
Hunt, S.D., & Arnett, D.B. 2003. Resource-advantage theory and embeddedness: Explaining R-A theory’s explanatory success. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(1): 1–17.
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand. 2000. Report to the Commissioner of Patents, Trade Marks and Designs. Wellington, New Zealand.
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand. 2003a. Patent protection guide. Wellington, New Zealand.
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand. 2003b. Report to the Commissioner of Patents, Trade Marks and Designs, Wellington, New Zealand.
Khandwalla, P.N. 1976/77. Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7(Winter): 21–51.
Khandwalla, P.N. 1977. The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
King, R.L. 1965. The marketing concept. In G. Schwartz (Ed.), Science in Marketing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kotler, P. 2003. Marketing Management(11th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Knight, G. 1997. Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12: 213–225.
Knight, G. 2000. Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2): 12–32.
Kreiser, P.M., Marino, L.D. & Weaver, K.M. 2002. Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: A multi-country analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(Summer): 71–93.
Lumpkin, G. & Dess, G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135–172.
Mansfield, E. 1986. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science, 32(2): 173–181.
Miles, M.P. & Arnold, D.R. 1991. The relationship between marketing orientation and entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4): 49–65.
Miles, M.P., Arnold, D.R. & Thompson, D. 1993. The interrelationship between environmental hostility and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 9(4): 12–23.
Miles, M.P., Covin, J.G. & Heeley, M.B. 2000. The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firm structure, strategy, and performance. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(4): 49–65.
Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29: 770–791.
Miller, D. & Friesen, P.H. 1983. Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4: 221–235.
Mintzberg, H. 1973. Strategy making in three modes. California Management Review, 16: 44–53.
Murray, J.A. 1981. Marketing is home for the entrepreneurial process. Industrial Marketing Management, 10: 93–99.
Narver, J. C., and S. F. Slater. 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(October): 20–35.
National Venture Capital Association. 2004. Venture capital commitments weighted to early stage in Q2 2004. August 3, 2004, New York.
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. 1996. Oslo Manual. Paris.
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. 2003. Compendium of patent statistics. Paris.
Olsson, H. & McQueen, D.H. 2000. Factors influencing patenting in small computer software producing companies. Technovation, 20: 563–576.
Rivette, K.G. & Klein, D. 2000. Rembrandts in the Attic: unlocking the hidden value of patents.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217–226.
Shapero, A. & Sokol, L. 1982. The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In Kent, C.A., Sexton, D.L. & Vesper, K.H. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Shapiro, A.R. 1990. Responding to the changing patenting system. Research and Technology Management, 33(5): 38–44.
Smart, C. & Vertinsky, I. 1984. Strategy and the environment: A case study of corporate responses to crises. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 199–213.
Statistics New Zealand. 2004. Innovation in New Zealand 2003, Wellington.
Stoney, M.A. & Stoney, S. 2003. Dual protection offered to computer programs- why move towards patenting. Logistics Information Management, 16(1): 81–89.
Wiklund, J. 1999. The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1): 37–47.
Williams, R.L. & Berkowitz, W.R. 2001. The yin and yang of intellectual property management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(2): 96–11.
Zeithaml, C.P. & Zeithaml, V.A. 1984. Environmental management: Revising the marketing perspective. Journal of Marketing, 48(Spring): 46–53.