Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Albert, 1991, Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents, Research Policy, 20, 251, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90055-U
Arts, 2018, Text matching to measure patent similarity, Strategic Management Journal, 39, 62, 10.1002/smj.2699
Azen, 2003, The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression, Psychological Methods, 8, 129, 10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129
Benson, 2015, Quantitative determination of technological improvement from patent data, PLOS ONE, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0121635
Bessen, 2008, The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics, Research Policy, 37, 932, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.005
Bessen, 2013, The patent litigation explosion, Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 45, 401
Blei, 2003, Latent dirichlet allocation, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993
Bryan, 2020, In-text patent citations: A user’s guide, Research Policy, 49, 103946, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103946
Budescu, 1993, Dominance analysis: a new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542, 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542
Carley, 2015, What is the probability of receiving a us patent, Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 203
Carpenter, 1981, Citation rates to technologically important patents, World Patent Information, 3, 160, 10.1016/0172-2190(81)90098-3
Carroll, 1953, An analytical solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis, Psychometrika, 18, 23, 10.1007/BF02289025
Carroll, 1957, Biquartimin criterion for rotation to oblique simple structure in factor analysis
Cattell, 1966, The scree test for the number of factors, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245, 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
Chicco, 2020, The advantages of the matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over f1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation, BMC Genomics, 21, 6, 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7
Chien, 2018, Inter partes review and the design of post-grant patent reviews, Berkeley Tech. LJ, 33, 817
Costello, 2005, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 7
Cotropia, 2009, The folly of early filing in patent law, Hastings LJ, 61, 65
Cotropia, 2013, Do applicant patent citations matter?, Research Policy, 42, 844, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.003
Cremers, 2004, Determinants of patent litigation in Germany
Czarnitzki, 2006, The market valuation of knowledge assets in US and European firms, 111
Deerwester, 1990, Indexing by latent semantic analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
Falk, 2017, Patent valuation with forecasts of forward citations, Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, 12, 101, 10.1515/jbvela-2016-0002
Feng, 2020, Crafting intellectual property rights: Implications for patent assertion entities, litigation, and innovation, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12, 140
Fischer, 2014, Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value–An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions, Research Policy, 43, 519, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.013
Fleming, 2007, Breakthroughs and the “long tail” of innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 69
Fleming, 2004, Science as a map in technological search, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 909, 10.1002/smj.384
Galasso, 2015, Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 317, 10.1093/qje/qju029
Gambardella, 2008, The value of European patents, European Management Review, 5, 69, 10.1057/emr.2008.10
Giuri, 2007, et al. inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey, Research Policy, 36, 1107, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.008
Gourieroux, 1984, Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Applications to Poisson models, 701
Griliches, 1990, Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661
Guellec, 2007
Guerrini, 2013, Defining patent quality, Fordham L. Rev., 82, 3091
Hall, 2005, Market value and patent citations, RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 16
Hall, 2001, The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools
Harhoff, 2003, Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights, Research Policy, 32, 1343, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
Harhoff, 2009, The duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office, Management Science, 55, 1969, 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1069
Harman, 1976
Hegde, 2009, Pioneering inventors or thicket builders: Which us firms use continuations in patenting?, Management Science, 55, 1214, 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1016
Helmers, 2018
Hemel, 2018, Innovation policy pluralism, Yale LJ, 128, 544
Henkel, 2010, Patent pending–why faster isn’t always better
Higham, 2017, Fame and obsolescence: Disentangling growth and aging dynamics of patent citations, Physical Review E, 95, 042309, 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.042309
Higham, 2017, Unraveling the dynamics of growth, aging and inflation for citations to scientific articles from specific research fields, Journal of Informetrics, 11, 1190, 10.1016/j.joi.2017.10.004
Higham, 2019, Ex-ante measure of patent quality reveals intrinsic fitness for citation-network growth, Physical Review E, 99, 060301, 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.060301
Jaffe, 2017, Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 1360, 10.1002/asi.23731
Jaffe, 2000, Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors, American Economic Review, 90, 215, 10.1257/aer.90.2.215
Johnson, 2000, A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1, 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1
Jöreskog, 1975, Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631, 10.1080/01621459.1975.10482485
Jung, 2016, The quest for originality: A new typology of knowledge search and breakthrough inventions, Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1725, 10.5465/amj.2014.0756
Kaiser, 1958, The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis, Psychometrika, 23, 187, 10.1007/BF02289233
Khanna, 2019, Patent quality: Does one size fit all?
Kogan, 2017, Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132, 665, 10.1093/qje/qjw040
Kuhn, 2019, How to measure and draw causal inferences with patent scope, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 26, 5, 10.1080/13571516.2018.1553284
Kuhn, 2020, Patent citations reexamined, The RAND Journal of Economics, 51, 109, 10.1111/1756-2171.12307
Lafond, 2019, Long-run dynamics of the US patent classification system, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29, 631, 10.1007/s00191-018-0603-3
Lai, 2009, Evaluating patents using damage awards of infringement lawsuits: A case study, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26, 167, 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.06.005
Lai, 2009, Modeling patent legal value by extension neural network, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 10520, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.027
Lanjouw, 1998, How to count patents and value intellectual property: The uses of patent renewal and application data, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 405, 10.1111/1467-6451.00081
Lanjouw, 2001, Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition, 129
Lanjouw, 2004, Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators, The Economic Journal, 114, 441, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
Lerner, 1994, The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis, RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 319, 10.2307/2555833
van Looy, 2019, Using text mining algorithms for patent documents and publications, 929
Love, 2019, Determinants of patent quality: Evidence from inter partes review proceedings, U. Colo. L. Rev., 90, 67
Magerman, 2010, Exploring the feasibility and accuracy of latent semantic analysis based text mining techniques to detect similarity between patent documents and scientific publications, Scientometrics, 82, 289, 10.1007/s11192-009-0046-6
Mann, 2012, A new look at patent quality: Relating patent prosecution to validity, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9, 1, 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01245.x
Marco, 2019, Patent claims and patent scope, Research Policy, 48, 103790, 10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.014
Marco, A. C., Tesfayesus, A., Toole, A. A., 2017. Patent litigation data from US district court electronic records (1963-2015). Technical Report 2017-06.
Marino, 2017, From alappat to alice: The evolution of software patents, Hastings Sci. & Tech. LJ, 9
Marx, 2020, Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles
Matthews, 1975, Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405, 442, 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9
McFadden, 1973, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, 105
Mejer, 2011, Patent backlogs at uspto and epo: systemic failure vs deliberate delays, World Patent Information, 33, 122, 10.1016/j.wpi.2010.12.004
Miller, 2018, Who’s suing us: Decoding patent plaintiffs since 2000 with the Stanford NPE litigation dataset, Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 21
Moser, 2018, Patent citations an analysis of quality differences and citing practices in hybrid corn, Management Science, 64, 1926, 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2688
Mukherjee, 2017, The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow’s breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot, Science Advances, 3, e1601315, 10.1126/sciadv.1601315
Mulaik, 2009
Narin, 1987, Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength, Research Policy, 16, 143, 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X
Pakes, 1980, Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report, Economics letters, 5, 377, 10.1016/0165-1765(80)90136-6
Pakes, 1984, The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources, 73
Palangkaraya, 2008, Applicant behaviour in patent examination request lags, Economics Letters, 101, 243, 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.08.014
Petruzzelli, 2015, Determinants of patent citations in biotechnology: An analysis of patent influence across the industrial and organizational boundaries, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 208, 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.018
Poege, 2019, Science quality and the value of inventions, Science Advances, 5, eaay7323, 10.1126/sciadv.aay7323
van Pottelsberghe, 2011, The quality factor in patent systems, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 1755, 10.1093/icc/dtr066
de Rassenfosse, 2018
de Rassenfosse, 2014, An introduction to the patstat database with example queries, Australian Economic Review, 47, 395, 10.1111/1467-8462.12073
de Rassenfosse, 2020, Low-quality patents in the eye of the beholder: Evidence from multiple examiners, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 12
de Rassenfosse, G., Higham, K.,. Decentralising the patent system. In: Government Information Quarterly, Forthcoming.
de Rassenfosse, 2020, Wanted: a standard for virtual patent marking, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15, 544, 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa063
de Rassenfosse, 2018, Are patent fees effective at weeding out low-quality patents?, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 27, 134
Régibeau, 2010, Innovation cycles and learning at the patent office: Does the early patent get the delay?, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58, 222, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00418.x
Roberts, 1988, What we’ve learned: Managing invention and innovation, Research-Technology Management, 31, 11, 10.1080/08956308.1988.11670497
Sampat, 2010, When do applicants search for prior art?, The Journal of Law and Economics, 53, 399, 10.1086/651959
Sapsalis, 2007, The institutional sources of knowledge and the value of academic patents, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 139, 10.1080/10438590600982939
Sapsalis, 2006, Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value, Research Policy, 35, 1631, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.014
Scherer, 2000, Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes, Research Policy, 29, 559, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00089-X
Scotchmer, 1991, Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 29, 10.1257/jep.5.1.29
Silverberg, 2007, The size distribution of innovations revisited: an application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance, Journal of Econometrics, 139, 318, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.10.017
Squicciarini, 2013, Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value
Trajtenberg, 1997, University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19, 10.1080/10438599700000006
Webster, 2011, Do patents matter for commercialization?, The Journal of Law and Economics, 54, 431, 10.1086/658487
Weston, 2011, WSABIE: Scaling up to large vocabulary image annotation
Whalen, 2020, Patent similarity data and innovation metrics, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 17, 615, 10.1111/jels.12261
Yang, 2015, Using the comprehensive patent citation network (cpc) to evaluate patent value, Scientometrics, 105, 1319, 10.1007/s11192-015-1763-7
Younge, 2016, Patent-to-patent similarity: a vector space model
Zahringer, 2018, Time to patent at the USPTO: the case of emerging entrepreneurial firms, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 923, 10.1007/s10961-016-9524-1
van Zeebroeck, 2011, The puzzle of patent value indicators, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20, 33, 10.1080/10438590903038256
van Zeebroeck, 2011, Filing strategies and patent value, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20, 539, 10.1080/10438591003668646
van Zeebroeck, 2011, The vulnerability of patent value determinants, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20, 283, 10.1080/10438591003668638