Patent Protection and Strategic Delays in Technology Development: Implications for Economic Growth

Southern Economic Journal - Tập 78 Số 1 - Trang 211-232 - 2011
Maggie Xiaoyang Chen1, Murat Iyigun2
1Department of Economics/Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, 2115 G Street, NW, Suite 367, Washington, DC 20052, USA
2Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Boulder, 256 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA, and IZA

Tóm tắt

We present an endogenous growth model in which both the investment to develop a new technology—that upgrades the quality of machines—and entry of imitators are determined endogenously. According to the model, how soon the new‐technology machine is launched after the patent is granted is influenced by two factors: returns to scale in technology development and “strategic delays.” Strategic delays in technology development are most likely to occur when earlier dates of success enable imitators to enter an industry, that is, when imitation is swift and relatively cheap and/or patent protection is relatively lengthy. We then explore the link between the optimal patent length and economic growth and find that the equilibrium investment in technology development and thus the expected rate of technological progress exhibit an inverted U‐shape relationship with respect to the legal patent length.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abernathy W., 1979, The development and introduction of the automotive turbocharger: A case of innovation in response to fuel economy regulation

Acs Z.andM.Sanders.2009.Intellectual property rights and the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship.Jena Economic Research Papers No. 2008-069.

10.1162/rest.91.1.20

10.2307/2951599

10.1007/BF00163342

Chu A. G.Cozzi andS.Galli.2009.Innovation-specific patent protection.IEAS Working Paper No. 09-A010.

Cozzi G.andS.Galli.2009.Upstream innovation protection: Common law evolution and the dynamics of wage inequality.University of Glasgow Working Papers No. 2009-20.

10.1287/mnsc.1070.0780

10.1257/mic.3.1.1

10.1016/j.jedc.2007.01.011

10.2307/2555432

10.1111/j.1467-8454.1996.tb00038.x

10.2307/2298044

10.2307/2937947

10.1007/s00712-006-0222-6

10.2307/2527311

10.1257/000282803321455160

10.1257/aer.91.1.240

Kamien M. I., 1974, Patent life and R&D rivalry., American Economic Review, 64, 183

Lerner J.2002.Patent protection and innovation over 150 years.NBER Working Paper No. W8977.

10.2307/2555792

Mokyr J., 1990, The lever of riches

10.1023/B:JOEG.0000023017.42109.c2

10.1016/S0304-3932(98)00040-3

10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00038-5

Rosenberg N., 1982, Inside the black box: Technology and economics

Scotchmer S., 2004, Innovation and incentives

10.1111/1467-937X.t01-1-00029