Partnerships in forest governance

Global Environmental Change - Tập 17 Số 3-4 - Trang 408-419 - 2007
I.J. Visseren-Hamakers1, Pieter Glasbergen1
1Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abusow, 2005. Canada-wide—SFM—Certification Status Report, Abusow International Ltd. for the Canadian Sustainable Forestry Certification Coalition. December 20, 2005.

AFP, 2005. Announcement on Organizational Matters and Decision-Making Mechanisms to Strengthen the Asia Forest Partnership (AFP), Asia Forest Partnership. November 15, 2005.

Arts, 2002, ‘Green alliances’ of business and NGOs; new styles of self-regulation or ‘dead-end-roads’?, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 26, 10.1002/csr.3

Bryant, 1997

Bulte, 2005, Trade and renewable resources in a second best world: an overview, Environmental & Resource Economics, 30, 423, 10.1007/s10640-004-5022-2

Cashore, 2002, Legitimacy and the privatisation of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 15, 503, 10.1111/1468-0491.00199

Cashore, 2004

COMIFAC, 2005. Traite relatif à la Conservation et à la Gestion Durable des Ecosystèmes Forestiers d’Afrique Centrale, February 2005.

Commission, 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT). Proposal for an EU action plan, Commission of the European Communities. May 21, 2003. COM (2003) 251 final.

2002

2002

1999

2003

Dyke, 2005, Examining the role of the forest industry in collaborative ecosystem management: implications for corporate strategy, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12, 10, 10.1002/csr.73

EP, 2005. European Parliament resolution on speeding up implementation of the EU action plan on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT). European Parliament. July 4 2005. B6-0412/2005.

Falkner, 2003, Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links, Global Environmental Politics, 3, 72, 10.1162/152638003322068227

2003

FSC, 1996. FSC principles and criteria for forest stewardship, Forest Stewardship Council. A.C. FSC-STD-01-001 (version 4-0).

FSC, 2005a. FSC By-Laws, Forest Stewardship Council. A.C. FSC By-Laws (Document 1.1).

FSC, 2005b. FSC Statutes, Forest Stewardship Council. A.C. FSC Statutes (Document 1.3).

FSC, 2006. Clarification regarding the relationship between FSC and MTCC, Forest Stewardship Council. September 13, 2006.

Glasbergen, 2002, 3

Glastra, 2002

Graf Lambsdorff, J., 2004. Corruption Perceptions Index 2004. University of Passau for Transparancy International. October 20, 2004.

2005

Gulbrandsen, 2005, Mark of sustainability? Challenges for fishery and forestry eco-labeling, Environment, 47, 8, 10.3200/ENVT.47.5.8-23

Humphreys, 1996, The global politics of forest conservation since the UNCED, Environmental Politics, 5, 231, 10.1080/09644019608414263

Jessop, 1998, The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development, International Social Science Journal, 155, 29, 10.1111/1468-2451.00107

1993

Kooiman, 2003

Meng Chuo, W., 2004. A Report on the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme, IDEAL.

MTCC, 2004a. Annual report. Malaysian Timber Certification Council.

2004

MTCC, 2006. Malaysian Timber Certification Council. Website.

Nelissen, 2002, The administrative capacity of new types of governance, Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 2, 5, 10.1023/A:1016019302732

2002

Ostrom, 1990

Ozinga, S., 2004. Footprints in the forest. Current practice and future challenges in forest certification, FERN.

Pattberg, 2005, The forest stewardship council: risk and potential of private forest governance, The Journal of Environment & Development, 14, 356, 10.1177/1070496505280062

PEFC, 2005a. Annual Review. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes.

PEFC, 2005b. PEFC Council Technical Document, Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes. October 28, 2005.

Rametsteiner, 2002, The role of governments in forest certification—a normative analysis based on new institutional economics theories, Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 163, 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00004-7

Rhone, 2004, 249

Richert, W., 2003. Onderzoek en beleidsmatig advies. Illegaal hout. De verantwoordelijkheden en de mogelijkheden voor Nederland binnen de internationale context. AIDEnvironment for Greenpeace Netherlands, NC-IUCN, ICCO, Milieudefensie, WNF. June 2003.

Ronit, 1999, Global governance through private organizations, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 12, 243, 10.1111/0952-1895.00102

1992

RSPO, 2005. RSPO Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil. Public release version, Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. October 17, 2005.

RTRS, 2005. Common Basis for the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), Round Table on Responsible Soy.

RTRS, 2006. Asunción. Declaration (Draft for discussion). Round Table on Responsible Soy. September 1, 2006.

Saurin, 2001, Global environmental crisis as the ‘Disaster Triumphant’: the private capture of public goods, Environmental Politics, 10, 63, 10.1080/714000578

SFB, 2005. Sustainable Forestry Initiative program: overview, governance, and historical information. 2005–2009 SFI Standard Overview. Sustainable Forestry Board.

SFI, 2002. 2002–2004 Edition Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Program, The Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Sustainable Forestry Board, and the American Forest & Paper Association (AF & PA).

SFI, 2004. Sustainable Forestry Initiative Standard (SFIS), The Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Sustainable Forestry Board, and the American Forest & Paper Association (AF & PA).

SFI, 2005a. Summary of Significant Changes in the 2005–2009 Sustainable Forestry Initiative Standard (SFIS) and Audit Procedures and Qualifications (APQ), Sustainable Forestry Board.

SFI, 2005b. 11th Annual Progress Report. Sustainable Forestry Initiative.

Siry, 2005, Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities, Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 551, 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.003

Stoker, 1998, Governance as theory: five propositions, International Social Science Journal, 155, 17, 10.1111/1468-2451.00106

Taylor, 2005, New political geographies: global civil society and global governance through world city networks, Political Geography, 24, 703, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.01.009

UK, 2004. UK Government timber procurement policy. Assessment of Five Certification Schemes. CPET phase 1 final report. UK Government. November 2004.

Underdal, 2002, 3

UNECE and FAO, 2005. Press release: Governments—significant actors for certification of sustainable forest management: UNECE/FAO policy forum reviews roles of governments. Timber Committee, Economic Commission for Europe and the European Forestry Commission, Food and Agricultural Organization. October 4, 2005.

Wakker, 2005

Watson, R.T., Zinyowera, M.C., Moss, R.H., (Eds.), 1995. Climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptions and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

WRI, 2004. Earth Trends Data Tables: Forests, Grasslands, and Drylands. World Resources Institute.

WWF, 2005. World Bank—WWF Alliance Annual Report 2004. World Wide Fund for Nature.

Young, 2002, 263

Dros, J.M., 2005. AIDEnvironment, 8 August.

Somé, L., 2005. WWF–CARPO, 7 September.

Verbelen, F., 2005. Greenpeace, Belgium, 8 August.