Áp lực từ bạn tình, Lịch sử Nạn nhân hóa và Rượu: Sự Bỏ Qua Quyết Định Sử Dụng Bao Cao Su của Phụ Nữ Được Trung Gian Bởi Tâm Trạng và Phản Ứng Tiêu Cực Dự Đoán Từ Bạn Tình

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 20 - Trang 134-146 - 2015
William H. George1, Kelly Cue Davis2, N. Tatiana Masters2, Kelly F. Kajumulo1, Cynthia A. Stappenbeck3, Jeanette Norris4, Julia R. Heiman5, Jennifer M. Staples1
1Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
2School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
4Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
5Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA

Tóm tắt

Phụ nữ có mức độ nghiện rượu cao so với phụ nữ tỉnh táo đã được đánh giá bằng cách sử dụng phân tích đường dẫn đa nhóm để kiểm tra giả thuyết rằng lịch sử nạn nhân hóa sẽ tương tác với áp lực từ bạn tình để bỏ qua việc sử dụng bao cao su, dẫn đến việc từ bỏ quyền quyết định về bao cao su - cho phép người đàn ông quyết định việc có sử dụng bao cao su hay không. Sau khi uống đồ uống có cồn, phụ nữ trong cộng đồng (n = 408) đã tự tưởng tượng vào một kịch bản mô tả một người bạn tình nam gây áp lực cao hoặc thấp để quan hệ tình dục không an toàn. Tâm trạng, phản ứng tiêu cực dự đoán từ bạn tình và việc từ bỏ quyết định về bao cao su đã được đánh giá. Trong cả hai mô hình kiểm soát và rượu, áp lực cao làm tăng phản ứng tiêu cực của bạn tình dự đoán, và tâm trạng tích cực có liên quan đến việc tăng cường sự từ bỏ. Trong mô hình rượu, lịch sử nạn nhân hóa dự đoán sự từ bỏ thông qua phản ứng tiêu cực dự đoán từ bạn tình, và áp lực làm giảm tâm trạng tích cực và sự từ bỏ. Trong mô hình kiểm soát, dưới áp lực cao, mức độ nghiêm trọng của lịch sử nạn nhân hóa có liên quan tích cực đến sự từ bỏ. Các phát hiện chỉ ra rằng việc từ bỏ quyết định về bao cao su là một khái niệm quan trọng trong việc hiểu cách mà lịch sử nạn nhân hóa của phụ nữ có thể ảnh hưởng bền vững đến các tương tác tình dục.

Từ khóa

#nạn nhân hóa #quyết định sử dụng bao cao su #áp lực từ bạn tình #tâm trạng #phản ứng tiêu cực

Tài liệu tham khảo

Masters NT, George WH, Davis KC, Norris J, Heiman JR, Jacques-Tiura AJ, et al. Women’s unprotected sex intentions: roles of sexual victimization, intoxication, and partner perception. J Sex Res. 2014;51(5):586–98. Johnsen LW, Harlow LL. Childhood sexual abuse linked with adult substance use, victimization, and AIDS risk. AIDS Educ Prev. 1996;8(1):44–57. Katz J, May P, Sörensen S, DelTosta J. Sexual revictimization during women’s first year of college: self-blame and sexual refusal assertiveness as possible mechanisms. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(11):2113–26. Gakumo CA, Moneyham LD, Enah CC, Childs GD. The moderating effect of sexual pressure on young urban women’s condom use. Res Nurs Health. 2012;35(1):4–14. Davis KC, Schraufnagel TJ, Kajumulo KF, Gilmore AK, Norris J, George WH. A qualitative examination of men’s condom use attitudes and resistance: “It’s just part of the game”. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(3):631–43. Davis KC, Stappenbeck CA, Norris J, George WH, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Schraufnagel TJ, et al. Young men’s condom use resistance tactics: a latent profile analysis. J Sex Res. 2014;51(4):454–65. O’Leary A. Women at risk for HIV from a primary partner: balancing risk and intimacy. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2000;11:191–234. Braun V. “Proper sex without annoying things”: anti-condom discourse and the “nature” of (hetero)sex. Sexualities. 2013;16(3–4):361–82. Fortenberry JD, Tu W, Harezlak J, Katz BP, Orr DP. Condom use as a function of time in new and established adolescent sexual relationships. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2):211–3. Teitelman AM, Ratcliffe SJ, Cederbaum JA. Parent-adolescent communication about sexual pressure, maternal norms about relationship power, and STI/HIV protective behaviors of minority urban girls. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2008;14(1):50–60. Jones R. Reliability and validity of the sexual pressure scale. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(4):281–93. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(5):539–65. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1980. http://www.pearsonhighered.com/educator/academic/product/0,0139364358,00%2ben-USS_01DBC.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2015. Morokoff PJ, Quina K, Harlow LL, Whitmire L, Grimley DM, Gibson PR, et al. Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) for women: development and validation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73(4):790–804. Quina K, Harlow LL, Morokoff PJ, Burkholder G, Deiter PJ. Sexual communication in relationships: when words speak louder than actions. Sex Roles. 2000;42(7–8):523–49. Harlow LL, Quina K, Morokoff PJ, Rose JS, Grimley DM. HIV risk in women: a multifaceted model. J Appl Biobehav Res. 1993;1(1):3–38. Gyurak A, Gross JJ, Etkin A. Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework. Cogn Emot. 2011;25(3):400–12. Testa M, VanZile-Tamsen C, Livingston JA. Childhood sexual abuse, relationship satisfaction, and sexual risk taking in a community sample of women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(6):1116–24. Testa M, Hoffman JH, Livingston JA. Alcohol and sexual risk behaviors as mediators of the sexual victimization-revictimization relationship. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(2):249–59. Lalor K, McElvaney R. Child sexual abuse, links to later sexual exploitation/high-risk sexual behavior, and prevention/treatment programs. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010;11(4):159–77. Malow R, Dévieux J, Lucenko BA. History of childhood sexual abuse as a risk factor for HIV risk behavior. J Psychol Trauma. 2006;5(3):13–32. Brener ND, McMahon PM, Warren CW, Douglas KA. Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67(2):252–9. Campbell R, Sefl T, Ahrens CE. The impact of rape on women’s sexual health risk behaviors. Health Psychol. 2004;23(1):67–74. Stoner SA, Norris J, George WH, Morrison DM, Zawacki T, Davis KC, et al. Women’s condom use assertiveness and sexual risk-taking: effects of alcohol intoxication and adult victimization. Addict Behav. 2008;33(9):1167–76. George WH, Davis KC, Masters NT, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Heiman JR, Norris J, et al. Sexual victimization, alcohol intoxication, sexual-emotional responding, and sexual risk in heavy episodic drinking women. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(4):645–58. Staples JM, George WH, Stappenbeck CA, Davis KC, Norris J, Heiman JR. Alcohol myopia and sexual abdication among women: examining the moderating effect of child sexual abuse. Addict Behav. 2015;41:72–7. Stoner SA, Norris J, George WH, Davis KC, Masters NT, Hessler DM. Effects of alcohol intoxication and victimization history on women’s sexual assault resistance intentions: the role of secondary cognitive appraisals. Psychol Women Q. 2007;31(4):344–56. Zawacki T, Norris J, Hessler DM, Morrison DM, Stoner SA, George WH, et al. Effects of relationship motivation, partner familiarity, and alcohol on women’s risky sexual decision making. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009;35(6):723–36. Marx BP, Heidt JM, Gold SD. Perceived uncontrollability and unpredictability, self-regulation, and sexual revictimization. Rev Gen Psychol. 2005;9(1):67–90. Kendler KS, Bulik CM, Silberg J, Hettema JM, Myers J, Prescott CA. Childhood sexual abuse and adult psychiatric and substance use disorders in women: an epidemiological and cotwin control analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(10):953–9. Cooper ML. Toward a person × situation model of sexual risk-taking behaviors: illuminating the conditional effects of traits across sexual situations and relationship contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98(2):319–41. Hendershot CS, George WH. Alcohol and sexuality research in the AIDS era: trends in publication activity, target populations and research design. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(2):217–26. Rehm J, Shield KD, Joharchi N, Shuper PA. Alcohol consumption and the intention to engage in unprotected sex: systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Addiction. 2012;107(1):51–9. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Recommended alcohol questions. http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/recommended-alcohol-questions (2003). Accessed 3 Jun 2014. Pokorny AD, Miller BA, Kaplan HB. The brief MAST: a shortened version of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. Am J Psychiatry. 1972;129(3):342–5. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Administering alcohol in human studies. http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/administering-alcohol-human-studies (2005). Accessed 3 Jan 2014. Schacht RL, Stoner SA, George WH, Norris J. Idiographically determined versus standard absorption periods in alcohol administration studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34(5):925–7. Koss MP, Abbey A, Campbell R, Cook S, Norris J, Testa M, et al. Revising the SES: a collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychol Women Q. 2007;31(4):357–70. Davis KC, Gilmore AK, Stappenbeck CA, Balsan MJ, George WH, Norris J. How to score the Sexual Experiences Survey? A comparison of nine methods. Psychol Violence. 2014;4(4):445–61. Muthén M. Mplus. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2013. Jones R, Gulick E. Reliability and validity of the sexual pressure scale for women-revised. Res Nurs Health. 2009;32(1):71–85. Mittal M, Senn TE, Carey MP. Fear of violent consequences and condom use among women attending an STD clinic. Women Health. 2013;53(8):795–807. Zerubavel N, Messman-Moore TL. Sexual victimization, fear of sexual powerlessness, and cognitive emotion dysregulation as barriers to sexual assertiveness in college women. Violence Women. 2013;19(12):1518–37. George WH, Davis KC, Norris J, Heiman JR, Stoner SA, Schacht RL, et al. Indirect effects of acute alcohol intoxication on sexual risk-taking: the roles of subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38(4):498–513. Masters NT, Norris J, Stoner SA, George WH. How does it end? Women project the outcome of a sexual assault scenario. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30(3):291–302. Noel NE, Maisto SA, Johnson JD, Jackson LA, Goings CD, Hagman BT. Development and validation of videotaped scenarios: a method for targeting specific participant groups. J Interpers Violence. 2008;23(4):419–36. Kajumulo KF, Davis KC, George WH. Experimental vignettes in assessing alcohol-involved risky sexual decision-making: evidence for external validity. Presentation presented at: annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality. Mexico: NovPuerto Vallarta; 2009. Norris J, Kiekel PA, Purdie MP, Abdallah DA. Using experimental simulations to assess self-reported sexual behavior: further evidence of external validity. Presentation at a symposium on Alternative Conceptualizations of Assessing Sexual Behavior presented at: annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality. Nevada: Las Vegas; 2010. Wilson GT, Lawson DM. Effects of alcohol on sexual arousal in women. J Abnorm Psychol. 1976;85(5):489–97. Martin CS, Sayette MA. Experimental design in alcohol administration research: limitations and alternatives in the manipulation of dosage-set. J Stud Alcohol. 1993;54(6):750–61. Strassberg DS, Lowe K. Volunteer bias in sexuality research. Arch Sex Behav. 1995;24(4):369–82.