Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Perez-Truglia, R. & Cruces, G. Partisan interactions: evidence from a field experiment in the United States. J. Polit. Econ. 125, 1208–1243 (2017).
Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S. & Nosek, B. A. How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1–14 (2014).
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A. & Van Bavel, J. J. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7313–7318 (2017).
Doherty, C., Kiley, J., & Jameson, B. Partisanship and political animosity in 2016. Pew Research Center https://www.people-press.org/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/ (2016).
Garrett, R. K. Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 14, 265–285 (2009).
Iyengar, S. & Krupenkin, M. Partisanship as social identity: implications for the study of party polarization. Forum 16, 23–45 (2019).
McConnell, C., Margalit, Y., Malhotra, N. & Levandusky, M. The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 62, 5–18 (2018).
Frenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W. & Loftus, E. F. False memories of fabricated political events. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 280–286 (2013).
Huber, G. A. & Malhotra, N. Political homophily in social relationships: evidence from online dating behavior. J. Polit. 79, 269–283 (2017).
Data dive: the emotional cost of the 2016 election. Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/us-datadive-election/data-dive-the-emotional-cost-of-the-2016-election-idUSKBN15M1YC (2017).
Chen, M. K. & Rohla, R. The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties. Science 360, 1020–1024 (2018).
Bail, C. A. et al. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9216–9221 (2018).
Brady, W. J., Crockett, M. J. & Van Bavel, J. J. The MAD model of moral contagion: the role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moralized content online. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620917336 (2020).
Martin, G. J. & Yurukoglu, A. Bias in cable news: persuasion and polarization. Am. Econ. Rev. 107, 2565–2599 (2017).
Van Bavel, J. J. & Pereira, A. The partisan brain: an identity-based model of political belief. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 213–224 (2018).
Van Bavel, J. J. et al. Using social and behavioral science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 460–471 (2020).
NBC News/Wall Street Journal Survey Datasets (Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies, 2020); https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6810602-200149-NBCWSJ-March-Poll-Final-3-14-20-Release.html
Bird, R. & Ritter, Z. Is the media creating division on COVID-19 health practices? Gallup https://news.gallup.com/poll/312749/media-creating-division-covid-health-practices.aspx (2020).
Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W. & Pepinsky, T. B. Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562796 (2020).
Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., Marshall, J., Höhs, J. M. & Bargh, J. A. Connecting self-reported physical distancing to real-world behavior at the individual and us state level. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kvnwp (2020).
Rosenfeld, D. L., Rothgerber, H. & Wilson, T. Politicizing the COVID-19 pandemic: ideological differences in adherence to physical distancing. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k23cv (2020).
Fisher, R. J. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consum. Res. 20, 303–315 (1993).
Maccoby, E. E. & Maccoby, N. in Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume I Theory and Method (ed. Lindzey, G.) 449–487 (Addison-Wesley, 1954).
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J. & Huber, G. A. Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 10, 519–578 (2015).
Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D. & Hollingsworth, T. D. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet 395, 931–934 (2020).
Gao, S. et al. Mobile phone location data reveal the effect and geographic variation of physical distancing on the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11430 (2020).
Hsiang, S. et al. The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature 584, 262–267 (2020).
McGrail, D. J., Dai, J., McAndrews, K. M. & Kalluri, R. Enacting national physical distancing policies corresponds with dramatic reduction in COVID-19 infection rates. PLoS ONE 15, e0236619 (2020).
Chinni, D. Uneven coronavirus spread leads to uneven partisan response. NBC News https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/uneven-covid-spread-leads-uneven-partisan-response-n1171491 (29 March 2020).
Painter, M. & Qiu, T. Political beliefs affect compliance with COVID-19 physical distancing orders. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569098 (2020).
Simonov, A., Sacher, S., Dubé, J. P. & Biswas, S. The persuasive effect of Fox News: non-compliance with social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic. NBER Working Paper No. 27237 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
Bursztyn L., Rao A., Roth C. & Yanagizawa-Drott D. Misinformation during a pandemic. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2020-44https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/BFI_WP_202044.pdf (2020).
Courtemanche, C., Garuccio, J., Le, A., Pinkston, J. & Yelowitz, A. Strong social distancing measures in the United States reduced the COVID-19 growth rate. Health Aff. 39, 7 (2020).
Guan et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1708–1720 (2020).
Lauer et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann. Intern. Med. 172, 577–582 (2020).
Linton et al. Incubation period and other epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infections with right truncation: a statistical analysis of publicly available case data. J. Clin. Med. 9, 538 (2020).
Furukawa, N. W., Brooks, J. T. & Sobel, J. Evidence supporting transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 while presymptomatic or asymptomatic. Emerg. Infect. Dis. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-1595_article (2020).
Johnson, D. B. & Thompson, A. S. How non-pharmaceutical interventions, politics, race, and economic conditions impacted the rate of new infections of COVID-19. Preprint at OSF https://osf.io/yx7zs/ (2020).
Kim, D. D. & Goel, A. Estimating case fatality rates of COVID-19. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 774–775 (2020).
Wilson, N., Kvalsvig, A., Barnard, L. T. & Baker, M. G. Case-fatality risk estimates for COVID-19 calculated by using a lag time for fatality. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 26, 1339–1441 (2020).
Krull, J. L. & MacKinnon, D. P. Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivar. Behav. Res. 36, 249–277 (2001).
Livadiotis, G. Statistical analysis of the impact of environmental temperature on the exponential growth rate of cases infected by COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15, e0233875 (2020).
Yuan, J., Li, M., Lv, G. & Lu, K. Monitoring transmissibility and mortality of COVID-19 in Europe. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 95, 311–315 (2020).
Allcott, H. et al. Polarization and public health: partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. NBER Working Paper No. 26946 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
Andersen, M. Early evidence on physical distancing in response to COVID-19 in the United States. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569368 (2020).
Dyck, J. J. Political distrust and conservative voting in ballot measure elections. Polit. Res. Q. 63, 612–626 (2010).
Conway, L. Why conservatives and liberals are not experiencing the same pandemic. Heterodox: The Blog https://heterodoxacademy.org/social-science-liberals-conservatives-covid-19/ (2020).
Smith, G. Fox News Nation. Preprint at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=1766884 (2020).
Haltiwanger, J. Video shows how Fox News rapidly shifted from downplaying coronavirus to taking it seriously as cases rose across the US. Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-video-shows-fox-news-shift-take-covid-19-seriously-2020-3 (2020).
Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A. E., Steele, G. M. & Thompson, A. W. Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 901–907 (2009).
Janoff-Bulman, R. To provide or protect: motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychol. Inq. 20, 120–128 (2009).
Doherty, C., Kiley, J. & Jameson. Ebola worries rise, but most are ‘fairly’ confident in government, hospitals to deal with disease. Pew Research Center https://www.people-press.org/2014/10/21/ebola-worries-rise-but-most-are-fairly-confident-in-government-hospitals-to-deal-with-disease/ (2014).
Cohen, G. L. Party over policy: the dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 808–822 (2003).
Macy, M., Deri, S., Ruch, A. & Tong, N. Opinion cascades and the unpredictability of partisan polarization. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0754 (2019).