Participatory value evaluation for the evaluation of flood protection schemes

Water Resources and Economics - Tập 36 - Trang 100188 - 2021
Niek Mouter1, Paul Koster2,3, Thijs Dekker4
1Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Transport and Logistics Group, the Netherlands
2Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, School of Business and Economics, Department of Spatial Economics, the Netherlands
3Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, John Stuart Mill College, the Netherlands
4Institute for Transport Studies Leeds and Choice Modelling Centre, University of Leeds, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Boardman, 2013 Mackie, 2014, Transport appraisal revisited, Res. Transport. Econ., 47, 3, 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.013 Hahn, 2008, Has economic analysis improved regulatory decisions?, J. Econ. Perspect., 22, 67, 10.1257/jep.22.1.67 Persky, 2001, Retrospectives. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the classical creed, J. Econ. Perspect., 15, 199, 10.1257/jep.15.4.199 Atkinson, 2018, Environmental valuation and benefit-cost analysis in U.K. Policy, J. Benefit-Cost Anal., 9, 97, 10.1017/bca.2018.6 Boadway, 1984 Boadway, 2006, Principles of cost-benefit analysis, Public Policy Rev, 2, 1 Ackerman, 2004 Sagoff, 1988 Sen, 1995, Environmental evaluation and social choice: contingent valuation and the market analogy, Jpn. Econ. Rev., 46, 23, 10.1111/j.1468-5876.1995.tb00003.x Johansson-Stenman, 2008, Are some lives more valuable? An ethical preferences approach, J. Health Econ., 27, 739, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.10.001 Mouter, 2017, Do individuals have different preferences as consumer and citizen? The trade-off between travel time and safety, Transport. Res. Part A, 106, 333 Bergstrom, 2004, Trading taxes vs. paying taxes to value and finance public environmental goods, Environ. Resour. Econ., 28, 533, 10.1023/B:EARE.0000036779.58923.02 Dekker, 2019, The economics of participatory value evaluation, SSRN Electron J, 10.2139/ssrn.3323645 Mouter, 2021, Contrasting the recommendations of participatory value evaluation and cost-benefit analysis in the context of urban mobility investments, Transport. Res. Pol. Pract., 144, 54, 10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.008 Lloyd-Smith, 2018, A new approach to calculating welfare measures in Kuhn-Tucker demand models, J. Choice Modell., 26, 19, 10.1016/j.jocm.2017.12.002 Pearce, 2006 Bosker, 2018, Nether Lands: evidence on the price and perception of rare natural disasters, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. Ward, 2000 Lankia, 2019, Effects of water quality changes on the recreation benefits of swimming in Finland: combined travel cost and contingent behavior model, Water Resour. Econ., 25, 2, 10.1016/j.wre.2017.10.002 Tonin, 2019, Estimating the benefits of restoration and preservation scenarios of marine biodiversity: an application of the contingent valuation method, Environ. Sci. Pol., 100, 162, 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.004 Brouwer, 2013, Modeling demand for catastrophic flood risk insurance in coastal zones in vietnam using choice experiments, Environ. Dev. Econ. Alphonce, 2014, Consumer vs. citizen willingness to pay for restaurant food safety, Food Pol., 49, 160, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.06.009 Lusk, 2011, Animal welfare economics, Appl. Econ. Perspect. Pol., 33, 463, 10.1093/aepp/ppr036 Mill, 2007, Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: citizen and consumer preferences, Ecol. Econ., 60, 642, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.005 Ivehammer, 2009, The payment vehicle used in CV studies of environmental goods does matter, J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 34, 450 Pfaff, 2019, Collective Local Payments for ecosystem services: new local PES between groups, sanctions, and prior watershed trust in Mexico, Water Resour. Econ., 28, 100136, 10.1016/j.wre.2019.01.002 Andersson, 2009, Benevolence and the value of road safety, Accid. Anal. Prev., 41, 286, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.11.009 Hultkrantz, 2006, The value of improved road safety, J. Risk Uncertain., 32, 151, 10.1007/s11166-006-8291-z Bishop, 2017, Putting a value on injuries to natural assets: the BP oil spill, Science, 356, 253, 10.1126/science.aam8124 Nyborg, 2000, Homo Economicus and Homo Politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 42, 305, 10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00091-3 Alvarez-Farizo, 2007, Choice modelling at the market stall: individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation, Ecol. Econ., 60, 743, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.009 Hess, 2012, Consistency and fungibility of monetary valuations in transport, Transport. Res. Part A, 46, 1507 Thaler, 1999, Mental accounting matters, J. Behav. Decis. Making, 12, 183, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F Anand, 2000, Utilities versus rights to publicly provided goods. Arguments and evidence from health care rationing, Economica, 67, 543, 10.1111/1468-0335.00224 Dolan, 2005, Health priorities and public preferences: the relative importance of past health experience and future health prospects, J. Health Econ., 24, 703, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.11.007 Johannesson, 1997, Is the valuation of a QALY gained independent of age? Some Empirical Evidence, J. Health Econ., 16, 589, 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00516-4 Kontoleon, 2005, Alternative payment vehicles in contingent valuation: the case of genetically modified foods Mouter, 2016, Value of Time: a citizen perspective, Transport. Res. Part A, 91, 317 Nunes, 2009, Comparing tax and tax reallocation payments in financing grail noise abatement programmes: results from a stated choice valuation studying Italy, Environ. Resour. Econ., 43, 503, 10.1007/s10640-008-9243-7 Hanley, 2001, Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?, J. Econ. Surv., 15, 435, 10.1111/1467-6419.00145 Johnston, 2017, Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies, J. Associat. Environ. Resour. Econ., 4, 319