Participatory trials of on-farm biochar production and use in Tamale, Ghana
Tóm tắt
Urban agriculture is characterized by fast rotation of cropping cycles and high inputs and outputs on relatively small areas of land. Depletion of soil organic carbon and low nutrient use efficiency are severe agricultural constraints in the sandy soils of West Africa. We hypothesized that such an intensive system would provide ideal preconditions for the use of biochar, that biochar would enhance yields in urban horticulture, and that farmers would be able to produce biochar for on-farm use in Tamale, Ghana. Therefore, we studied the opportunities and challenges of biochar using a semi-participatory research approach. Working with 12 participant farmers, we defined research questions which were relevant to their livelihoods and collected qualitative and observational data, which determined the selection of variables to measure quantitatively. Different quality parameters such as leaf color and stiffness of lettuce were important to farmers and marketers when assessing the agronomic benefits of biochar. By adding biochar to their normal agricultural practice farmers were able to increase lettuce yields by 93%. This remarkable increase might be partially caused by farmers’ improved management of biochar plots: they concentrated their resources where they expected to yield the largest returns. Using a simple top-lit updraft gasifier, a special chimney for rice husk carbonization, it was relatively simple for farmers to produce biochar in the field, with an efficiency of 15–33%. These stoves’ payback times were between 1 and 2 months. Yet, rather than the efficiency of the carbonization technology, often emphasized in biochar research, the availability of feedstock and labor considerations determine the technology selected by farmers for biochar production. This is a novel approach to considering the economic realities of farmers in a semi-participatory appraisal where farmers both produce and apply biochar. This is crucial in order to understand and identify meaningful and economically viable uses of biochar.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bationo A, Kihara J, Vanlauwe B, Waswa B, Kimetu J (2007) Soil organic carbon dynamics, functions and management in West African agro-ecosystems. Agric Syst 94(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.011
BiocharPlus (2015) Educative Brochure: BiocharPlus - Energy, health, agricultural and environmental benefits from biochar use: building capacities in ACP countries
Brewer CE (2012) Biochar characterizatoin and engineering. Dissertation, Iowa State University, Iowa, USA
de Ridder N, van Keulen H (1990) Some aspects of the role of organic matter in sustainable intensified arable farming systems in the west-African semi-arid-tropics (SAT). Fertilizer Res 26(1):299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01048768
Ding Y, Liu Y, Liu S, Li Z, Tan X, Huang X, Zeng G, Zhou L, Zheng B (2016) Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36(2):36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0372-z
Diogo RVC, Buerkert A, Schlecht E (2010) Horizontal nutrient fluxes and food safety in urban and peri-urban vegetable and millet cultivation of Niamey, Niger. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 87(1):81–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-009-9315-2
Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T, Joseph S, Lehmann J (2012) Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol 114:644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022
Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature Pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51(6):2061–2069. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25409
Gyasi E, Fosu M, Kranjac-Berisavljevic G, Mensah A, Obeng F, Yiran G, Fuseini I (2014) Building urban resilience: Assessing urban and peri-urban agriculture in Tamale, Ghana. Nairobi, Kenya
Häring V, Manka’abusi D, Akoto-Danso EK, Werner S, Atiah K, Steiner C, Lompo DJP, Adiku S, Buerkert A, Marschner B (2017) Effects of biochar, waste water irrigation and fertilization on soil properties in west African urban agriculture. Sci Rep 7(1):10738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10718-y
Hoffmann V, Probst K, Christinck A (2007) Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development? Agric Hum Values 24(3):355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-007-9072-2
Kapur PC (1985) Production of reactive bio-silica from the combustion of rice husk in a tube-in-basket (TiB) burner. Powder Technol 44(1):63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(85)85022-1
Kimetu JM, Lehmann J, Ngoze SO, Mugendi DN, Kinyangi JM, Riha S, Verchot L, Recha JW, Pell AN (2008) Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient. Ecosystems 11:726–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9154-z
Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, Bogomolova I, Xu X (2009) Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 41:210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.016
Lal R (2009) Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research. Eur J Soil Sci 2:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01114.x
Lambrou Y (2001) A typology: participatory research and gender analysis in natural resource management. Working document. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Future Harvest M4 - Citavi, Cali, Colombia
Le Bissonnais Y, Arrouays D (1997) Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: II. Application to humic loamy soils with various organic carbon contents. Eur J Soil Sci 48(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00183.x
Mugwe J, Mugendi D, Mucheru-Muna M, Merckx R, Chianu J, Vanlauwe B (2009) Determinants of the decision to adopt integrated soil fertility management practices by smallholder farmers in the central highlands of Kenya. Exp Agric 45(1):61–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479708007072
Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Harris W (2011) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163(3–4):247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.021
Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Amonette JE, Ippolito JA, Lima IM, Gaskin J, Das KC, Steiner C, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Schomberg H (2012) Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an ultisol and two aridisols. Soil Sci 177(5):310–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31824e5593
Predotova M, Gebauer J, Diogo RVC, Schlecht E, Buerkert A (2010) Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide from urban gardens in Niamey, Niger. Field Crop Res 115(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.010
Pretty JN (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev 23(8):1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(95)00046-f
Scoones I, Thompson J (2009) Farmer first revisited: innovation for agricultural Research and Development. Practical Action Publishing, Worwideshire
Steiner C (2016) Considerations in biochar characterization. In: Guo M, He Z, Uchimiya SM (eds) Agricultural and environmental applications of biochar: advances and barriers, SSSA special publication, vol 63. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, pp 87–100. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub63.2014.0038.5
Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WEH, Zech W (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171(6):893–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625199