Participatory health councils and good governance: healthy democracy in Brazil?
Tóm tắt
The Brazilian Government created Participatory Health Councils (PHCs) to allow citizen participation in the public health policy process. PHCs are advisory bodies that operate at all levels of government and that bring together different societal groups to monitor Brazil’s health system. Today they are present in 98% of Brazilian cities, demonstrating their popularity and thus their potential to help ensure that health policies are in line with citizen preferences. Despite their expansive reach, their real impact on health policies and health outcomes for citizens is uncertain. We thus ask the following question: Do PHCs offer meaningful opportunities for open participation and influence in the public health policy process? Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews with health council members were conducted. Data from these interviews were analyzed using a qualitative interpretive content analysis approach. A quantitative analysis of PHC data from the Sistema de Acompanhamento dos Conselhos de Saude (SIACS) database was also conducted to corroborate findings from the interviews. We learned that PHCs fall short in many of the categories of good governance. Government manipulation of the agenda and leadership of the PHCs, delays in the implementation of PHC decision making, a lack of training of council members on relevant technical issues, the largely narrow interests of council members, the lack of transparency and monitoring guidelines, a lack of government support, and a lack of inclusiveness are a few examples that highlight why PHCs are not as effective as they could be. Although PHCs are intended to be inclusive and participatory, in practice they seem to have little impact on the health policymaking process in Brazil. PHCs will only be able to fulfil their mandate when we see good governance largely present. This will require a rethinking of their governance structures, processes, membership, and oversight. If change is resisted, the PHCs will remain largely limited to a good idea in theory that is disappointing in practice.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Coelho VSP. Brazil’s health councils: the challenge of building participatory political institutions. IDS Bulletin. 2004;35(2):33–9.
Savedoff W. Transparency and corruption in the health sector: a conceptual framework and ideas for action in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2007.
Joshi A. Do they work? Assessing the impact of transparency and accountability initiatives in service delivery. Dev Policy Rev. 2013;31(s1):s29–48.
World Bank. Brazil: Toward A More Inclusive and Effective Participatory Budget in Porto Alegre. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8042.
Coelho VSP. What did we learn about citizen involvement in the health policy process: lessons from Brazil. J Public Deliberation. 2013;9(1):9.
Abers R. Inventing local democracy: grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000.
Goldfrank B. Deepening local democracy in Latin America: participation, decentralization, and the left. University Park, PA: Penn State Press; 2012.
McNulty S. Voice and vote: decentralization and participation in post-Fujimori Peru. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press; 2011.
Wampler B. Participatory budgeting in Brazil: contestation, cooperation, and accountability. University Park, PA: Penn State Press; 2010.
Kohler JC. Mapping of good practices of anti-corruption interventions in the health sector. New York, NY: United Nations Development Program; 2011.
Ministério da Saúde. Resolução n.° 333, de 4 de novembro de 2003. 2003. http://conselho.saude.gov.br/biblioteca/livros/resolucao_333.pdf
Barnes M, Coelho VSP. Social participation in health in Brazil and England: inclusion, representation and authority. Health Expect. 2009;12(3):226–36.
Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin P. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82(1):37–50.
Coelho VSP, Pozzoni B, Cifuentes M. Participation and public policies in Brazil. In: The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2005. p. 174–84.
Vigoda E. From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Adm Rev. 2002;62(5):527–40.
Reddel T, Woolcock G. From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland. Aust JPublic Admin. 2004;63(3):75–87.
Avritzer L. Participatory institutions in democratic Brazil. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; 2009.
Van Stralen CJ, De Lima ÂMD, Da Fonseca Sobrinho D, Santo Saraiva LDE, Van Stralen TBDS, Belisário SA. Conselhos de Saúde: efetividade do controle social em municípios de Goiás e Mato Grosso do Sul. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2006;11(3):621–32.
Landerdhal MC, Unfer B, Braun K, Skupien JA. Resoluções do Conselho de Saúde: instrumento de controle social ou documento burocrático. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2010;15:2431–6.
Movimento Saúde +10. Movimento Nacional em Defesa da Saúde Pública. 2012. http://www.saudemaisdez.org.br/index.php/2012-10-10-19-14-46/manifesto.
UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). What Is Good Governance? http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
Hsieh HF. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277–88.
Zhang Y, Wildemuth BM. In: Wildemuth BM, editor. Qualitative analysis of content. Westport CT: Libraries Unlimited; 2009. p. 308–19.
Ministério da Saúde Política nacional de educação permanente para o controle social no sistema único de saúde-sus. 2006. http://www.saude.sp.gov.br/resources/ses/perfil/profissional-da-saude/grupo-tecnico-de-acoes-estrategicas-gtae/saude-da-populacao-negra/documentos-tecnicos/politica_de_educacao_permanente_para_o_controle_social.pdf.
Wendhausen A, Caponi S. O diálogo ea participação em um conselho. Cad Saude Publica. 2002;18(6):1621–8.
Cornwall A. O desafio da ocupação dos novos espaços democráticos no Brasil: o caso do Conselho Municipal de Saúde do Cabo de Santo Agostinho. Desenvolvimento em Questão. 2008;6(11):11–40.
Schönleitner G. Can public deliberation democratise state action? Municipal health councils and local democracy in Brazil. In: Harriss J, Stokke K, Tornquist O, editors. Politicising democracy: the new local politics of democratisation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. p. 75–106.
Santos SF, Vargas AMD, Lucas SD. Conselheiros Usuários do Conselho Municipal de Saúde de Belo Horizonte: características sociais e representatividade. Saúde e Sociedade. 2011;20(2):483–95.
Moraes IHS, Veiga L, Vasconcellos MM, Santos S. Inclusão digital e conselheiros de saúde: uma política para a redução da desigualdade social no Brasil. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva. 2009;14(3):879–88.
Geromel R. Internet in brazil: key hard facts you must know. 2013. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ricardogeromel/2013/10/28/internet-in-brazil-key-hard-facts-you-must-know.
Conselho Nacional de Saúde http://conselho.saude.gov.br/apresentacao/regimento.htm.
Irwin A. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘New’ scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci. 2006;36(2):299–320.
Martin GP. ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociol Health Illn. 2008;30(1):35–54.
Jones BG, Anghie A, Ayers AJ, Chimni BS, Gathii JT, Grovogui SN, et al. Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2006.