Participation in and provision of public goods: Does granularity matter?

Anderson LR, Mellor JM, Milyo J (2004) Social capital and contributions in a public-goods experiment. Am Econ Rev 94(2):373–376 Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J 100(401):464–477 Bartling B, Fehr E, Herz H (2014) The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6):2005–2039 Benito-Ostolaza JM, Hernandez P, Sanchis- Llopis JA (2016) Do individuals with higher cognitive ability play more strategically? J Behav Exp Econ 64:5–11 Bowles S, Gintis H (2002) Social capital and community governance. Econ J 112(483):419–436 Brañas Garza P, García-Muñoz T, Hernán González R (2012) Cognitive effort in the beauty contest game. J Econ Behav Organ 83:254–260 Brockner J, Guzzi B, Kane J, ans Levine E, Shaplen K (1984) Organizational fundrasing: further evidence on the effect of legitimizing small donations. J Consum Res 11:611–614 Cadsbya C, Maynesb E (1999) Voluntary provision of threshold public goods with continuous contributions: experimental evidence. J Public Econ 71:53–73 Carpenter JP, Daniere AG, Takahashi LM (2004) Cooperation, trust, and social capital in southeast asian urban slums. J Econ Behav Organ 55(4):533–551 Carpenter P, Just M, Shell P (1990) What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychol Rev 97(3):404–431 Cialdini R, Schroeder D (1976) Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: when even a penny helps. J Pers Soc Psychol 34(4):599–604 Croson R, Shang J (2008) The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions. Exp Econ 11:221–233 Desmet P (1999) Asking for less to obtain more. J Interact Market 13(3):55–65 Doob A, McLaughlin D (1989) Ask and you shall be given: request size and donations to a good cause. J Appl Soc Psychol 19(12):1049–1056 Fehr E, Gachter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am Econ Rev 90(4):980–994 Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10:171–178 Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ Lett 71(3):397–404 Freedman J, Fraser S (1966) Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. J Pers Soc Psychol 4:95–202 Frey B, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Am Econ Rev 94(5):1717–1722 Gangadharan L, Nikiforakis N (2009) Does the size of the action set matter for cooperation? Econ Lett 104:115–117 Gill D, Prowse V (2016) Cognitive ability, character skills, and learning to play equilibrium: a leve-k-analysis. J Polit Econ 124(6):1619–1676 Gravel N (1994) Can a ranking of opportunity sets attach an intrinsic importance to freedom of choice? Am Econ Rev 84(2):454–458 Gray J, Thompson P (2004) Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics. Nat Rev Neurosci 5(6):471–482 Grootaert C (2003) Social capital: the missing link. In: Dekker P, Uslaner EM (eds) Social capital and participation in everyday life, chapter 8. Roudledge, London Huang P (2020) Trump and who: How much does the U.S. give? What’s the impact of a halt in funding? NPR, retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/04/15/834666123/trump-and-who-how-much-does-the-u-sgive-whats-the-impact-of-a-halt-in-funding Knack S, Keefer P (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Q J Econ 112(4):1251–1288 Lange A, List JA, Price MK (2007) Using lotteries to finance public goods: theory and experimental evidence. Int Econ Rev 48(3):901–927 Leonard T, Croson R, de Oliveira A (2010) Social capital and public goods. J Soc Econ 30:474–481 Martin R, Randal J (2008) How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others? J Econ Behav Organ 67(1):228–238 Meinzen-Dick R (1997) Farmer participation in irrigation, a 20 years of experience and lessons for the future. Irrigat Drain Syst 11(2):103–118 Name-Correa A, Yildirim H (2016) Giving in to social pressure. Games Econo Behav 99:99–116 Ostrom E (1995) Incentives, rules of the game, and development. In: Bruno M, Pleskovicr B (eds) Annual bank conference on development economicsk. World Bank, Washington Pattanaik PK, Xu Y (1990) On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Louvain Econ Rev 56(3–4):383–390 Putnam R (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York Raven J (1936) Mental tests used in generic studies: the performance of related individuals on tests mainly educative and mainly reproductive (M.Sc. thesis). London: University of London Reiley D, Samek, A (2015) How do suggested donations affect charitable gifts? Evidence from a fields experiment in public broadcasting. In: SPI working paper series, Universty of Chicago, vol 142-SPI Schniter E, Sheremeta R, Shields T (2015) The problem with all-or-nothing trust games: what others choose not to do matters in trust-based exchange. In: MPRA Paper, no. 68561 Sen A (1988) Freedom of choice: concept and content. Eur Econ Rev 32(2–3):269–294 Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: the impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econ J 119:1422–1439 Shearman S, Yoo J (2007) “Even a penny will help”: legitimization of paltry donation and social proof in soliciting donation to a charitable organization. Commun Res Rep 24(4):271–282 Sobel J (2002) Can we trust social capital? J Econ Lit 40(1):139–154 Weyant J, Smith S (1987) Getting more by asking for less: the effects of request size on donations of charity. J Appl Soc Psychol 17(4):392–400 Wollebaek D, Selle P (2003) Participation and social capital formation: Norway in a comparative perspective 1. Scand Polit Stud 26(1):67–91 Zhang Y, Fu F, Wu T, Xie GLW (2013) A tale of two contribution mechanisms for nonlinear public goods. Sci Rep 3(2021):1–5