Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Khác biệt đảng phái trong chính sách khí hậu địa phương? Một phân tích thực nghiệm về các cộng đồng khí hậu Hesse
Tóm tắt
Các đảng phái có tạo ra sự khác biệt trong việc thiết kế chính sách khí hậu không? Câu hỏi này không chỉ có ý nghĩa trong bối cảnh của chế độ khí hậu toàn cầu dựa trên những đóng góp quốc gia, mà còn vì chính sách khí hậu thường được nhận thức là bị chính trị hóa hơn so với chính sách môi trường nói chung. Bài viết này đi sâu vào câu hỏi ở cấp độ cộng đồng, điều mà những nghiên cứu về giả thuyết khác biệt đảng phái trong chính sách môi trường chưa được chú ý nhiều. Dựa trên ví dụ của bang Hessen, chúng tôi kiểm tra đầu tiên liệu sự khác biệt giữa các đảng có vai trò gì trong việc các thành phố và cộng đồng của Hessen tham gia vào mạng lưới khí hậu “Hessen aktiv: Các cộng đồng khí hậu”. Thứ hai, chúng tôi kiểm tra liệu việc xây dựng các kế hoạch hành động bắt buộc giữa các thành viên của mạng lưới có liên quan đến sự khác biệt giữa các đảng hay không. Nghiên cứu được thực hiện dựa trên phân tích dữ liệu sự kiện của các thành phố và cộng đồng Hessen trong khoảng thời gian từ 2009 đến 2020. Kết quả cho thấy rằng các thành phố và cộng đồng do Thị trưởng từ đảng Xanh lãnh đạo có xu hướng tham gia vào các cộng đồng khí hậu. Tuy nhiên, chúng tôi không tìm thấy bằng chứng cho thấy việc xây dựng các kế hoạch hành động, và do đó là sự tham gia rõ ràng hơn vào chính sách khí hậu, có thể gắn với sự thuộc về đảng của các Thị trưởng. Thế nhưng, có sự gia tăng khả năng lập kế hoạch hành động tương ứng với tỷ lệ của đảng Xanh trong đại diện cộng đồng. Những kết quả không đồng nhất này cho thấy rằng giả thuyết khác biệt đảng phái cũng có thể đóng góp vào việc giải thích sự khác biệt trong chính sách khí hậu cấp địa phương, và rằng cần có thêm nghiên cứu về vấn đề này ở cấp độ địa phương.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abel, Dennis. 2021. The diffusion of climate policies among German municipalities. Journal of Public Policy 41:111–136.
Abou-Chadi, Tarik, und Mark A. Kayser. 2017. It’s not easy being green: Why voters punish parties for environmental policies during economic downturns. Electoral Studies 45:201–207.
Bansard, Jennifer S., Philipp H. Pattberg, und Oscar Widerberg. 2017. Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics 17:229–246.
Bausch, Thomas, und Karin Koziol. 2020. New policy approaches for increasing response to climate change in small rural municipalities. Sustainability 12:1894.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, und Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42:1260–1288.
Benz, Arthur, Jörg Kemmerzell, Michèle Knodt, und Anne Tews. 2015. The trans-local dimension of local climate policy: Sustaining and transforming local knowledge orders through trans-local action in three German cities. Urban Research & Practice 8:319–335.
Betsill, Michele M., und Harriet Bulkeley. 2004. Transnational networks and global environmental governance: the cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterly 48:471–493.
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter. 2006. Ereignisanalyse. In Methoden der Politikwissenschaft: Neuere qualitative und quantitative Analyseverfahren, Hrsg. Joachim Behnke, Thomas Gschwend, Delia Schindler, und Kai-Uwe Schnapp, 113–123. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Böcher, Michael, und Annette Elisabeth Töller. 2016. Umwelt- und Naturschutzpolitik der Bundesländer. In Die Politik der Bundesländer: Zwischen Föderalismusreform und Schuldenbremse, Hrsg. Achim Hildebrandt, Frieder Wolf, 259–281. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., und Bradford S. Jones. 2004. Event history modeling: a guide for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bräuninger, Thomas, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, und Christian Stecker. 2020. Parteienwettbewerb in den deutschen Bundesländern. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Bulkeley, Harriet. 2010. Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35:229–253.
Bulkeley, Harriet, und Kristine Kern. 2006. Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK. Urban Studies 43:2237–2259.
Busch, Henner. 2015. Linked for action? An analysis of transnational municipal climate networks in Germany. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 7:213–231.
Carter, Neil. 2013. Greening the mainstream: party politics and the environment. Environmental Politics 22:73–94.
Carter, David B., und Curtis S. Signorino. 2010. Back to the future: modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis 18:271–292.
Carter, Neil, Robert Ladrech, Conor Little, und Vasiliki Tsagkroni. 2018. Political parties and climate policy. Party Politics 24:731–742.
Dalton, Russell J. 2009. Economics, environmentalism and party alignments: a note on partisan change in advanced industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48:161–175.
Debus, Marc, und Jale Tosun. 2021. The manifestation of the green agenda: a comparative analysis of parliamentary debates. Environmental Politics https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1864130.
Debus, Marc, Christoph Knill, und Jale Tosun. 2012. Drum zahle, wer sich ewig bindet: Eine Analyse der Gebührenhöhe für eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaften in Baden-Württemberg. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 53:1–28.
Egner, Björn. 2018. Die institutionellen Beziehungen der Bürgermeister in Deutschland zum Rat und zur kommunalen Verwaltung. In Bürgermeister in Deutschland: Problemsichten – Einstellungen – Rollenverständnis, Hrsg. Hubert Heinelt, Björn Egner, Timo Alexander Richter, Angelika Vetter, Sabine Kuhlmann, und Markus Seyfried, 19–24. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Ewert, Stefan, Michael Jankowski, und Jochen Müller. 2018. Politikpositionen von Regierungen im Ländervergleich. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 12:683–702.
Farstad, Fay M. 2018. What explains variation in parties’ climate change salience? Party Politics 24:698–707.
de Francesco, Fabrizio, Lucas Leopold, und Jale Tosun. 2020. Distinguishing policy surveillance from policy tracking: transnational municipal networks in climate and energy governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22:857–869.
Garmann, Sebastian. 2014. Do government ideology and fragmentation matter for reducing CO2-emissions? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Ecological Economics 105:1–10.
Giest, Sarah, und Michael Howlett. 2013. Comparative climate change governance: lessons from European transnational municipal network management efforts. Environmental Policy and Governance 23:341–353.
Gore, Christopher D. 2010. The limits and opportunities of networks: municipalities and Canadian climate change policy. Review of Policy Research 27:27–46.
Gross, Martin, und Michael Jankowski. 2020. Dimensions of political conflict and party positions in multi-level democracies: evidence from the Local Manifesto Project. West European Politics 43:74–101.
Hakelberg, Lukas. 2014. Governance by diffusion: Transnational municipal networks and the spread of local climate strategies in Europe. Global Environmental Politics 14:107–129.
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71:1467–1487.
Hildén, Mikael Andrew J.Jordan, und Dave Huitema. 2017. Special issue on experimentation for climate change solutions editorial: the search for climate change and sustainability solutions-The promise and the pitfalls of experimentation. Journal of Cleaner Production 169:1–7.
Holtmann, Everhard, Christian Rademacher, und Marion Reiser. 2017. Kommunalpolitik. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Jäckle, Sebastian. 2020. Event-History-Analysis. In Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft, Hrsg. Claudius Wagemann, Achim Goerres, und Markus B. Siewert, 543–571. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Jahn, Detlef. 2016. The politics of environmental performance. Institutions and preferences in industrialized democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jensen, Christian B., und Jae-Jae Spoon. 2011. Testing the ‘party matters’ thesis: explaining progress towards Kyoto Protocol targets. Political Studies 59:99–115.
Jordan, Andrew J., Harro van Asselt, Frans Berkhout, Dave Huitema, und Tim J. Rayner. 2012. Understanding the paradoxes of multi-level governing: Climate change policy in the European Union. Global Environmental Politics 12:43–66.
Kalafatis, Scott E., und Maria Carmen Lemos. 2017. The emergence of climate change policy entrepreneurs in urban regions. Regional Environmental Change 17:1791–1799.
Kemmerzell, Jörg, und Anne Hofmeister. 2019. Innovationen in der Klimaschutzpolitik deutscher Großstädte: Der Einfluss überlokalen Handelns im Vergleich. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60:95–126.
Kemmerzell, Jörg, und Anne Tews. 2014. Akteursorientierungen im überlokalen Handlungsraum. Herausforderungen und Chancen lokaler Klimapolitik im Mehrebenensystem. der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 7:269–287.
Kern, Kristine, und Harriet Bulkeley. 2009. Cities, europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies 47:309–332.
King, Ronald Frederick, und Alexandra Borchardt. 1994. Red and green: Air pollution levels and left party power in OECD countries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 12:225–241.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knill, Christoph, Marc Debus, und Stephan Heichel. 2010. Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970–2000. European Journal of Political Research 49:301–336.
Krause, Rachel M. 2011. Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Affairs 33:45–60.
Krause, Rachel M., Yi Hongtao, und Richard C. Feiock. 2016. Applying policy termination theory to the abandonment of climate protection initiatives by U.S. local governments. Policy Studies Journal 44:176–195.
Le Quéré, Corinne, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Charlie Wilson, Jale Tosun, Robbie Robert J.Andres Andrew, Josep G. Canadell, Andrew J. Jordan, Glen P. Peters, und Detlef P. van Vuuren. 2019. Drivers of declining CO 2 emissions in 18 developed economies. Nature Climate Change 9:213–217.
Lee, Taedong, und C. Koski. 2015. Multilevel governance and urban climate change mitigation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33:1501–1517.
Leinaweaver, Justin, und Robert Thomson. 2016. Greener governments: Partisan ideologies, executive institutions, and environmental policies. Environmental Politics 25:633–660.
Müller, Jochen. 2009. The impact of the socio-economic context on the Länder parties’ policy positions. German Politics 18:365–384.
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, und Thomas Poguntke (Hrsg.). 2002. Green parties in national governments. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
Neumayer, Eric. 2004. The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics 51:167–175.
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 20:550–557.
Otto, Antje, Kristine Kern, Wolfgang Haupt, Peter Eckersley, und Annegret H. Thieken. 2021. Ranking local climate policy: assessing the mitigation and adaptation activities of 104 German cities. Climatic Change 167:1–23.
Pitt, Damian. 2010. The impact of internal and external characteristics on the adoption of climate mitigation policies by US municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28:851–871.
Potrafke, Niklas. 2017. Partisan Politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics 45:712–750.
Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30:155–183.
Schoenefeld, Jonas J., Kai Schulze, Mikael Hildén, und Andrew J. Jordan. 2019. Policy monitoring in the EU: The impact of institutions, implementation, and quality. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60:719–741.
Schulze, Kai. 2014. Do parties matter for international environmental cooperation? An analysis of environmental treaty participation by advanced industrialised democracies. Environmental Politics 23:115–139.
Schulze, Kai. 2021. Policy characteristics, electoral cycles, and the partisan politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics 21:44–72.
Tobin, Paul. 2017. Leaders and laggards: climate policy ambition in developed states. Global Environmental Politics 17:28–47.
Töller, Annette Elisabeth. 2017. Verkehrte Welt? Parteien(in)differenz in der Umweltpolitik am Beispiel der Regulierung des Frackings. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27:131–160.
Vasi, Ion Bogdan. 2006. Organizational environments, framing processes, and the diffusion of the program to address global climate change among local governments in the United States. Sociological Forum 21:439–466.
Ward, Hugh, und Xun Cao. 2012. Domestic and international influences on green taxation. Comparative Political Studies 45:1075–1103.
Wenzelburger, Georg. 2015. Parteien. In Handbuch Policy-Forschung, Hrsg. Georg Wenzelburger, Reimut Zohlnhöfer, 81–112. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Wurster, Stefan, und Christina Köhler. 2016. Die Energiepolitik der Bundesländer. In Die Politik der Bundesländer: Zwischen Föderalismusreform und Schuldenbremse, Hrsg. Achim Hildebrandt, Frieder Wolf, 283–314. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.