Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios

Journal of Evolutionary Biology - Tập 21 Số 4 - Trang 919-948 - 2008
Hanna Kokko1, Michael D. Jennions2
1Laboratory of Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
2School of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT, Australia

Tóm tắt

AbstractConventional sex roles imply caring females and competitive males. The evolution of sex role divergence is widely attributed to anisogamy initiating a self‐reinforcing process. The initial asymmetry in pre‐mating parental investment (eggs vs. sperm) is assumed to promote even greater divergence in post‐mating parental investment (parental care). But do we really understand the process? Trivers [Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971(1972), Aldine Press, Chicago] introduced two arguments with a female and male perspective on whether to care for offspring that try to link pre‐mating and post‐mating investment. Here we review their merits and subsequent theoretical developments. The first argument is that females are more committed than males to providing care because they stand to lose a greater initial investment. This, however, commits the ‘Concorde Fallacy’ as optimal decisions should depend on future pay‐offs not past costs. Although the argument can be rephrased in terms of residual reproductive value when past investment affects future pay‐offs, it remains weak. The factors likely to change future pay‐offs seem to work against females providing more care than males. The second argument takes the reasonable premise that anisogamy produces a male‐biased operational sex ratio (OSR) leading to males competing for mates. Male care is then predicted to be less likely to evolve as it consumes resources that could otherwise be used to increase competitiveness. However, given each offspring has precisely two genetic parents (the Fisher condition), a biased OSR generates frequency‐dependent selection, analogous to Fisherian sex ratio selection, that favours increased parental investment by whichever sex faces more intense competition. Sex role divergence is therefore still an evolutionary conundrum. Here we review some possible solutions. Factors that promote conventional sex roles are sexual selection on males (but non‐random variance in male mating success must be high to override the Fisher condition), loss of paternity because of female multiple mating or group spawning and patterns of mortality that generate female‐biased adult sex ratios (ASR). We present an integrative model that shows how these factors interact to generate sex roles. We emphasize the need to distinguish between the ASR and the operational sex ratio (OSR). If mortality is higher when caring than competing this diminishes the likelihood of sex role divergence because this strongly limits the mating success of the earlier deserting sex. We illustrate this in a model where a change in relative mortality rates while caring and competing generates a shift from a mammalian type breeding system (female‐only care, male‐biased OSR and female‐biased ASR) to an avian type system (biparental care and a male‐biased OSR and ASR).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s00265-003-0628-x

10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00823.x

10.1093/beheco/12.4.397

Alcock J., 1998, Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach

10.1006/anbe.1998.1079

10.1086/285606

10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01247.x

10.1093/beheco/12.6.726

10.1006/anbe.1995.0214

10.1098/rspb.1998.0562

10.1038/hdy.1948.21

10.1007/BF00002788

10.1006/anbe.1997.0619

10.1098/rspb.2007.1278

10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01327.x

10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x

10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01147.x

10.1007/978-1-4757-9918-7_1

10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00111.x

10.1098/rspb.2002.2161

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00409.x

10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.068

10.1515/9780691206981

10.1126/science.1133311

10.1098/rspb.2007.1138

10.1086/417793

10.1038/351058a0

10.1038/313131a0

10.1098/rspb.2005.3458

10.1016/0169-5347(91)90163-R

Coleman R.M., 1985, Parental investment decision rules: a test in bluegill sunfish, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 18, 59, 10.1007/BF00299238

Dawkins R., 1989, The Selfish Gene

10.1038/262131a0

10.1006/jtbi.1996.0208

10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00724.x

10.1007/s00265-003-0671-7

Düsing C., 1884, Die Regulierung des Geschlechtsverhältnisses bei der Vermehrung der Menschen, Tiere und Pflanzen, 10.5962/bhl.title.44516

10.1006/tpbi.2000.1482

10.1126/science.327542

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.001.0001

10.1093/beheco/arg075

10.1038/nature02427

10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1445:SOEFDD]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01158.x

Foellmer M.W., 2008, Broken genitals function as mating plugs and affect sex ratios in the orb‐web spider argiope aurantia, Evol. Ecol. Res., 10, 449

10.1038/nature02562

10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.000305

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01790.x

10.1098/rsbl.2006.0616

10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.10.008

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00317.x

10.1098/rspb.1998.0569

10.1098/rstb.2001.0958

10.1016/0003-3472(78)90131-8

10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01613.x

10.1016/0169-5347(96)81050-0

10.1086/431023

10.1098/rspb.2000.0979

10.1126/science.213.4509.779

10.1086/285108

10.1038/346172a0

10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.013

10.1086/285890

Härdling R., 2005, The evolution of prudent choice, Evol. Ecol. Res., 7, 697

10.1086/367587

10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.026

10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80146-0

10.1098/rstb.2001.0925

10.1007/s10539-005-9016-4

10.1098/rspb.1997.0025

10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.008

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00442.x

10.1017/S0006323199005423

10.1093/oxfordjournals.beheco.a000383

10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80321-5

10.1098/rspb.2000.0968

10.1006/anbe.1999.1149

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03912.x

10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80223-1

10.1007/BF00300148

10.1163/002829685X00055

10.1007/BF00002396

10.1007/s00265-007-0431-1

10.1086/522936

10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00075.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00009-0

10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.012

10.1098/rstb.2001.0926

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01086.x

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01058.x

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00212.x

10.1098/rstb.2005.1784

10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00090.x

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110259

10.1093/beheco/ari097

10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00694.x

10.1098/rspb.2006.3753

10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80179-4

10.1073/pnas.0505172102

10.1006/anbe.1998.0764

10.1038/382153a0

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0464:DDSOGT]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89071-0

Levitt S., 2005, Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01762.x

10.1007/s00265-002-0507-x

10.1086/339992

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00398.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00124-1

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01209.x

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01806.x

10.1016/0003-3472(77)90062-8

10.1006/jtbi.2000.2093

10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.003

10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00115.x

10.1007/s00265-003-0616-1

10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.006

10.1007/BF02027123

10.1093/beheco/11.5.472

10.1007/s001140100255

10.1006/anbe.1998.0731

10.1126/science.1074196

10.1006/jtbi.1998.0889

10.1038/nature01528

10.1098/rspb.2007.1395

10.1098/rstb.2001.0929

10.1098/rspb.1994.0148

10.1098/rspb.1990.0114

10.1098/rspb.1996.0048

10.1098/rspb.2007.1498

10.1098/rspb.1992.0030

10.1098/rspb.1992.0142

10.1098/rspb.1997.0216

10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.005

10.1093/beheco/10.2.149

10.1098/rstb.2001.0930

Richardson P.R.K., 1987, Aardwolf mating system: overt cuckoldry in an apparently monogamous mammal, S. Afr. J. Sci., 83, 405

10.1093/beheco/arm074

10.1093/beheco/ari076

10.1007/s002650050505

Roff D.A., 2002, Life History Evolution

10.1038/416733a

10.1007/BF00299427

10.1007/978-94-011-1578-0_11

10.2307/4089381

10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.11.021

10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.03.010

10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00247.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01953-4

10.1098/rstb.2001.0931

10.1515/9780691206882

10.1073/pnas.0603474103

10.1098/rspb.2005.3309

10.1098/rspb.2007.1041

10.1086/286031

10.1098/rspb.2005.3368

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00213.x

10.1093/jhered/92.2.100

10.1006/anbe.2000.1507

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00930.x

10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.002

Trivers R., 1972, Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, 139

Trivers R., 1985, Social Evolution

10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00755.x

10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.008

10.1086/341520

10.1086/431252

10.1006/anbe.1999.1215

10.2307/1382840

10.1093/beheco/4.1.66

10.1093/beheco/9.1.20

Williams C.G., 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Thought

10.1086/284729

10.2307/3677187

10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.043

10.1086/285377

10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6010103.x

10.1093/icb/25.3.785