Parallels, prescience and the past: Analogical reasoning and contemporary international politics

International Politics - Tập 52 - Trang 1-19 - 2014
Andrew Mumford1
1School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Tóm tắt

Analogical reasoning has held a perpetual appeal to policymakers who have often drafted in historical metaphor as a mode of informing decision making. However, this article contends that since the beginning of the ‘War on Terror’, we have arguably seen the rise of a more potent form of analogy, namely ones that are selected because they fulfil an ideological function. Analogical reasoning as a tool of rational decision making has increasingly become replaced by analogical reasoning as a tool of trenchant ideologically informed policy justification. This article addresses three key areas that map out the importance of analogical reasoning to an understanding of developments in contemporary international politics: the relationship between history and politics, in intellectual and policy terms; a critical assessment of the appeal that analogical reasoning holds for policymakers; and the development of a rationale for a more effective use of history in international public policy making.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrew, C. (2010) Defence of the Realm: The Authorised History of MI5. London: Penguin. Biddle, S. (2006) Seeing Baghdad, thinking Saigon. Foreign Affairs 85 (2): 2–14. Blair, T. (2010) A Journey. London: Hutchinson. Brigham, R.K. (2006) Is Iraq Another Vietnam? New York: Public Affairs. Bush, G.W. (2001) Remarks by the president on the USS enterprise on pearl Harbor Day, 7 December. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011207.html, accessed 31 July 2012. Bush, G.W. (2007) Discusses war on terror at veterans of foreign wars national convention, 22 August. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/release/2007/08/print/20070822-3.html, accessed 31 July 2012. Campbell, K.J. (2007) A Tale of Two Quagmires: Iraq, Vietnam and the Hard Lessons of War. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. Carr, E.H. (1987) What is History? 2nd edn. London: Penguin. Coleridge, S.T. (1884) Table Talk and Omniana. London: George Bell and Sons. Cowper-Coles, S. (2011) Cables from Kabul: The Inside Story of the West’s Afghanistan Campaign. London: Harper Press. Dalacoura, K. (2012) The 2011 uprisings in the arab middle East: Political change and geopolitical implications. International Affairs 88 (1): 63–79. Duffy, G. (2001) Give structure its due: Political agency and the Vietnam commitment decisions. Japanese Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 161–175. Dumbrell, J. and Ryan, D (eds.) (2007) Vietnam in Iraq: Tactics, Lessons, Legacies and Ghosts. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Eden, A. (1960) Full Circle: The Memoirs of Sir Anthony Eden. London: Cassell. Evans, R.J. (2014) Altered Pasts: Counterfactuals in History. London: Little, Brown. Fallows, J. (2002) The fifty-first state? Atlantic Monthly November. Freedman, L. (2007) The Official History of the Falklands Campaign (2 volumes). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Freeland, C. (2011) Lessons from Central Europe for the Arab Spring. New York Times 16 June. Fukuyama, F. (2001) Their target: The modern world. Newsweek (‘Issues 2002’ Special Issue): pp. 62–63. Gaddis, J.L. (1997a) History, theory and common ground. International Security 22 (1): 75–85. Gaddis, J.L. (1997b) We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Gardner, L.C. and Young, M.B. (eds.) (2007) Iraq and the Lessons of Vietnam. New York: The New Press. Goodman, M.S. (2014) The Official History of the Joint Intelligence Committee, Volume I: From the Approach of the Second World War to the Suez Crisis. Abingdon: Routledge. Griffin, J. (2003) It’s all Greek! The New York Review of Books 18 December. Haber, S. H., Kennedy, D.M. and Krasner, S.D. (1997) Brothers under the skin: Diplomatic history and international relations. International Security 22 (1): 34–43. Harvey, F.P. (2012) Explaining the Iraq War: Counterfactual Theory, Logic and Evidence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hehir, A. (2006) The impact of analogical reasoning on US foreign policy towards Kosovo. Journal of Peace Research 43 (1): 67–81. Hitchens, C. (2005) Beating a dead parrot: Why Iraq and Vietnam have nothing whatsoever in common. The Slate 31 January. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2005/01/beating_a_dead_parrot.single.html, accessed 10 January 2012. Houghton, D.P. (1996) The role of analogical reasoning in novel foreign policy situations. British Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 523–552. Jeffrey, K. (2011) MI6: The History of the Secret Intelligence Service, 1909–1949. London: Bloomsbury. Jervis, R. (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Kaldor, M. (2011) Human security. Society and Economy 33 (3): 441–448. Kennedy-Pipe, C. (2000) International history and international relations theory: A dialogue beyond the cold war. International Affairs 76 (4): 741–754. Khong, Y.F. (1992) Analogies at War: Korean, Munich, Dien Bien Phu and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Kissinger, H. (1994) Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster. Lawson, G. (2012) The eternal divide? History and international relations. European Journal of International Relations 18 (2): 203–226. Layne, C. (2008) Security studies and the use of history: Neville chamberlain’s grand strategy revisited. Security Studies 17 (3): 397–437. Lebow, R.N. (2010) Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Levy, J. (1997) Too important to leave to the other: History and political science in their study of international relations. International Security 22 (1): 22–33. Lomperis, T.J. (2006) Dispelling the ghost: Iraq as the Vietnam war we cannot afford to lose. Journal of Conflict Studies 26 (2): 5–24. May, E.R. (1973) ‘Lessons’ of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Meierhenrich, J. (2006) Analogies at War. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 11 (1): 1–40. Noon, D.H. (2004) Operation enduring analogy: World war two, the war on terror, and the uses of historical memory. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 7 (3): 339–366. Private Eye (2012) Diary. No.1319, 27 July-9 August, p. 26. Purdum, T.S. (2005) Flashback to the 60’s: A sinking sensation of parallels between Iraq and Vietnam. New York Times 29 January. Record, J. (2007) The use and abuse of history: Munich, Vietnam and Iraq. Survival 49 (1): 163–180. Record, J. and Terrill, W.A. (2004) Iraq and Vietnam: Differences, Similarities and Insights. Honolulu, HA: University Press of the Pacific. Reiter, D. (1994) Learning, realism and alliances: The weight of the shadow of the past. World Politics 46 (4): 490–526. Ricks, T.E. (2006) Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq. London: Penguin. Roberts, G. (2006) History, theory and the narrative turn in IR. Review of International Studies 32 (4): 703–714. Rose, R. (1991) Comparing forms of comparative analysis. Political Studies 39 (3): 446–462. Schlesinger, A.M. (2005) War and the American Presidency, revised edn. New York: W.W. Norton. Sheffield, G. (2008) Military past, military present, military future: The usefulness of military history. RUSI Journal 153 (3): 102–107. Springborg, R. (2011) Whither the Arab spring? 1989 or 1848? International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs 46 (3): 5–12. Steiner, Z. (1997) On writing international history: Chaps, maps and much more. International Affairs 73 (3): 531–546. Tierney, D. (2007) ‘Pearl harbor in reverse’: Moral analogies in the Cuban missile crisis. Journal of Cold War Studies 9 (3): 49–77. Ulrichsen, K.C., Held, D. and Brahimi, A. (2011) The Arab 1989?, openDemocracy, 11 February. http://www.opendemocracy.net/kristian-coates-ulrichsen-david-held-alia-brahimi/arab-1989, accessed 31 July 2012. Vertzberger, Y.Y.I. (1986) Foreign policy decisionmakers as practical-intuitive historians: Applied history and its shortcomings. International Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 223–247. Way, L. (2011) The lessons of 1989. Journal of Democracy 22 (4): 17–27. Woods, N. (ed.) (1996) Explaining International Relations Since 1945. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Woodward, B. (2002) Bush at War. New York: Simon & Schuster. Zantovsky, M. (2011) 1989 and 2011: Compare and contrast. World Affairs Journal July/August. http://worldaffairsjournal.org/print/3431, accessed 31 July 2012.