Paradoxes of curating colonial memory

Charles Jeurgens1, Michael Karabinos1
1University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

AbstractIn the last decade, many initiatives were taken to digitize colonial archival legacies. In this article, we analyse Dutch policy and a number of Dutch initiatives in this field with the aim to find answers to our central question whether digitization of colonial archival legacies offers possibilities to decolonize these archives. The aspiration to decolonize colonial legacies seems to be a paradoxical statement since there is something innately colonial in the recordkeeping systems that cannot, and should not, be removed. But digitization of archives means creating new recordkeeping infrastructures, and these new infrastructures shape new interfaces between the documents which were created in the past and the users of today. We argue that decolonizing these archives can be based on a comprehensive understanding of the complexity of the variables which shape the new digital archival infrastructure. Inspired by the third-space perspective and the concept of (de)coloniality, we explore the possibilities to develop archival infrastructures that contribute to decolonizing colonial archival legacies in the sense of offering multivocality, multiple agency and multiple provenance. We conclude that what we call third-space infrastructural frameworks create promising opportunities to contribute to the decolonization of colonial archival legacies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aljoe N, Maddock Dillen E, Doyle B, Hopwood E (2015) Obeah and the early Caribbean archive. Atl Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2015.1025217:258-266

Auer L (1998) Disputed archival claims—analysis of an International Survey: a RAMP study. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000113472. Accessed 29 Feb 2020

Bailkin J (2015) Where did the empire go? Archives and decolonization in Britain. Am Hist Rev 120:884–889

Balk G, van Dijk F, Kortlang D, Gaastra F, Niemeijer H, Koenders P (2007) The archives of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) and the local institutions in Batavia (Jakarta). Brill, Leiden

Bastian JA (2013) The records of memory, the archives of identity: celebrations, texts and archival sensibilities. Arch Sci 13:121–131

Bastian JA (2019) Epilogue. On Augusta’s porch; a meditation on decolonizing the archives. Arch Sci 19:205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09310-2

Bhabha H (2004) The location of culture. Routledge, New York

Bhabha H (2011) Cultural diversity and cultural differences. In: Baladra Z, Havranek V (eds) Atlas of transformation. JRP/Ringier, Zürich

Bos-Rops J, van Schie H, Slot B, Zandvliet C (eds) (1982) De archieven van het Algemeen Rijksarchief. Samson, Alphen aan de Rijn

Breckenridge K (2014) The Politics of the parallel archive: digital imperial and the future of record-keeping in the age of digital reproduction. J South Afr Stud 40:499–519

Brilmyer G (2018) Archival assemblages: applying disability studies’ political/relational model to archival description. Arch Sci 18:95–118

De Nijs R (2017) Interview met de nationaal archivaris van Suriname, Informatieprofessional 1. https://informatieprofessional.nl/2018/02/interview-nationaal-archivaris-suriname/

Drake J (2016) RadTech meets RadArch: towards a new principle for archives and archival description. https://medium.com/on-archivy/radtech-meets-radarch-towards-a-new-principle-for-archives-and-archival-description-568f133e4325. Accessed Dec 2019

Dresscher T (2018) Het dekoloniseren van archiefbeheer en historisch onderzoek in Nederland. Archievenblad 122:14–19

During S (2003) Postmodernism or post-colonialism today. In: Griffiths G, Tiffin H, Ashcroft A (eds) The post-colonial studies reader. Taylor & Francis, London

Early Caribbean Digital Archive (n.d.) https://ecda.northeastern.edu/home/about/decolonizing-the-archive/. Accessed Dec 2019

Encyclopaedia Britannica (n.d.) https://www.britannica.com/topic/decolonization. Accessed Dec 2019

Falola T (2017) Ritual archives. In: Afoloayan A, Falola T (eds) The Palgrave handbook of African Philosophy. Palgrave, New York, pp 703–728

Finieg A, Parthesius R, Groot B, Jaffe R, van der Linde S, van Roosmalen P (2008) Heritage trails: international cultural heritage policies in a European perspective. In: Oostindie G (ed) Dutch colonialism, migration and cultural heritage: past and present. Brill, Leiden

Friedrich M (2018) Epilogue: Archives and archiving across cultures—towards a matrix of analysis. In: Bausi A, Brockman C, Friedrich M, Kienitz S (eds) Manuscripts and archives: comparative views on recordkeeping. De Gruyter, Hamburg, pp 421–445

Ghaddar J, Caswell M (2019) “To go beyond”: towards a decolonial archival praxis. Arch Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09311-1

Gikandi S (2015) Rethinking the archive of enslavement. Early Am Lit 50:81–102

Guleij R, Knaap G (eds) (2017) Het Grote VOC Boek. Wbooks, Zwolle

Harris V (2011) Jacques Derrida meets Nelson Mandela: archival ethics at the endgame. Arch Sci 11:113–124

Hassankhan M (2006) Het archiefwezen in Suriname in historisch perspectief. In: Jagdew E, Egger J, Arron-Denz M, Donk O, Stolk R (eds) Een Liber Amicorum voor Andre Loor. Instituut voor de Opleiding van Leraren, Paramaribo

Hennessy K (2016) From the Smithsonian’s MacFarlane Collection to Inuvialuit Living History. In: van den Akker C, Legêne S (eds) Museums in a digital culture. How art and heritage become meaningful. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp 109–127

Hurley C (2005a) What, if anything, is archival description? Arch Manuscr 33:110–145

Hurley C (2005b) When something is not related to everything else. Arch Manuscr 33:52–91

Jeurgens C (2013a) The untamed archive: history-writing in the Netherlands East Indies and the use of archives. Hist Hum Sci 26:84–106

Jeurgens C (2013b) The scent of the digital archive. Dilemmas with archive digitization. BMGN Low Ctries Hist Rev 128:30–54

Karabinos M (2019) Decolonisation in Dutch archives. Defining and debating. BMGN Low Ctries Hist Rev 134:129–141

Ketelaar E (2017) Archival turns and returns: studies of the archive. In: Gilliland A, McKemmish S, Lau A (eds) Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, Clayton, pp 228–268

Kurtz M (2006) A postcolonial archive? On the Paradox of Practice in a Northwest Alaska project. Archivaria 61:63–90

Lee J (2017) Exploring the shaky ground of queer/ed archives and their methodologies. In: Gilliland A, McKemmish S, Lau A (eds) Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, Clayton

Leopold R (2013) Articulating culturally sensitive knowledge online: a Cherokee case study. Mus Anthr Rev 7:85–104

Licona A (2005) (B)orderland’s rhetorics and representations: the transformative potential of feminist third-space scholarship and zines. Natl Women’s Stud Assoc J 17:104–129

Licona A (2012) Zines in third space: radical cooperation and borderlands rhetoric. SUNY Press, Albany

Lowry J (forthcoming) Disputed archival claims: an international survey (2018). Report to the International Council on Archives’ Expert Group on Shared Archival Heritage, Liverpool

Lowry J (ed) (2017) Displaced archives. Routledge, London

Lowry J (2019a) Designing for decolonisation: equitable and representative professional networks. ICA blog, 9 June 2019. https://blog-ica.org/2019/06/06/designing-for-decolonisation-equitable-and-representative-professional-networks/. Accessed 11 Feb 2019

Lowry J (2019b) Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives. Arch Sci 19(2):185–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z

Manžuch Z (2017) Ethical issues in digitization of cultural heritage. J Contemp Arch Stud 4:1–17

McEwan C (2003) Building a postcolonial archive? Gender, collective memory and citizenship in post-apartheid South Africa. J South Afr Stud 29:739–757

McKemmish S (2017) Recordkeeping in the continuum. An Australian tradition. In: Gilliland A, McKemmish S, Lau A (eds) Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, Clayton

Mignolo (2011) Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: on (de)coloniality, border thinking and epistemic disobedience. Postcolonial Stud 14:273–283

Mignolo W (2013) Enacting the archives, decentring the muses: the Museum of Islamic Art in Doha and the Asian Civilizations Museum in Singapore. Ibraaz https://www.ibraaz.org/essays/77. Accessed Dec 2019

Mignolo W (2017) Coloniality is far from over, and so must be decoloniality. Afterall 43:39–45

Mignolo W, Walsh C (2018) On decoloniality: concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press, Durham

Mir F (2015) The archives of decolonization. Am Hist Rev 120:844–851

Namhila E (2016) Content and use of colonial archives: an under-researched issue. Arch Sci 16:111–123

National Archives of Indonesia. Inventaris Arsip Keresidenan Soerabaja (1816) 1817–1860 (1894), inventory number 350

National Archives and Records Administration (2014) Strategy for digitizing archival materials for public access 2015–2024. https://www.archives.gov/files/digitization/pdf/digitization-strategy-2015-2024.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2020

National Archives of the Netherlands. Inventaris van het archief van de Procureur- Generaal bij het Hooggerechtshof van Nederlands- Indië, (1936) 1945–1949 (1969), Series ID 2.10.17, which contains several descriptions of seized documents

National Archives of the Netherlands. Inventaris van het archief van de Marine en Leger Inlichtingendienst, de Netherlands Forces Intelligence Service en de Centrale Militaire Inlichtingendienst in Nederlands-Indië, Series ID 2.10.62 in particular inventory numbers 3013-7112. Includes translations

Nesmith T (2005) The concept of societal provenance ad records of nineteenth-century Aboriginal-European relations in Western Canada: implications for archival theory and practice. Arch Sci 6:351–360

Oost-Indische Testamenten (n.d.) https://www.nationaalarchief.nl/onderzoeken/index/nt00214?searchTerm. Accessed Dec 2019

Otten F (2004) Gids voor de archieven van de ministeries en de Hoge Colleges van Staat, 1813–1940. Huygens ING, Den Haag

Parry B (1995) Problems in current theories of colonial discourse. In: Ashcroft B, Griffiths G, Tiffin H (eds) The post-colonial studies reader. Routledge, London, pp 36–52

Peterson T (2010) To have and to have not: archives as information, archives as symbol. In: Janssens G, Kwanten G, Pompe K, van Engen H (eds) Archives without borders. Archivos sin fronteras. Vlaamse Vereniging voor Bibliotheek, Archief & Documentatie, Berchem

Reciprocal Research Network (n.d.) https://www.rrncommunity.org. Accessed Dec 2019

Rekrut A (2014) Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images. Arch Manuscr 42:238–247

Risam R (2019) New digital worlds. Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press, Evanston

Rowley S (2013) The Reciprocal Research Network: the development process. Mus Anthr Rev 7:22–43

Said E (1994) Culture and imperialism. Bookmarque, Croydon

Sejarah-nusantara (n.d.) https://sejarah-nusantara.anri.go.id. Accessed Dec 2019

Sentance N (2018) What is our purpose https://archivaldecolonist.com/2018/12/29/what-is-our-purpose/. Accessed Dec 2019

Smit J (2012) To claim or not to claim sharing archives: policy and practice. In: Jeurgens C, Kappelhof T, Karabinos M (eds) Colonial legacy in South East Asia: the Dutch archives. Stichting Archiefpublicaties, The Hague, pp 173–189

Smith LT (2001) Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Taylor and Francis, London

Smith L (2006) Uses of heritage. Routledge, Abingdon

Spivak G (1985) The Rani of Simur: an essay in reading the archives. Hist Theory 24:247–272

Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E (2010) New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. Int J Herit Stud 16:59–76

TANAP (2001) The first steps. https://web.archive.org/web/20011216014804/http:/www.tanap.net:80/about/first_steps.htm. Accessed 11 Feb 2020

TANAP (2007) TANAP research. http://www.tanap.net/content/universities/current_research/current_research_list.cfm. Accessed 11 Feb 2020

Thylstrup N (2018) The politics of mass digitization. MIT Press, Cambridge

Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1996–1997, 25 320, nr. 1

Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1997–1998, 25 320, nr 2, 27 November 1997 [Minutes of meeting, Parliament]

UNESCO Memory of the World (n.d.) Programme objectives. https://en.unesco.org/programme/mow. Accessed 11 Feb 2020

UNESCO Memory of the World Register (2002) Nomination form [The Dutch East India Company (VOC, Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie)]. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/mow/nomination_forms/netherlands+voc+archives.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2020

Van Maanen E, Ashworth G (2016) The mutuality of colonial heritage in multi-ethnic Paramaribo

reality or illusion. Association of Critical Heritage Studies, 3 Jun 2016-8 Jun 2016, Montreal

Venir A, Lundin O (2016) A queer glossary. Van Abbe Museum, Eindhoven

Wekker G (2016) White innocence: paradoxes of colonialism and race. Duke University Press, Durham

Westerman F (2019) El Negro en ik. Querido Fosfor, Amsterdam

Woorden doen ertoe [Words matter] (n.d.) Tropen Museum, Afrika Museum, Museum Volkenkunde, and Wereldmusuem. https://www.tropenmuseum.nl/sites/default/files/2018-06/WordsMatter_Nederlands.PDF. Accessed 7 Feb 2020

Wright K (2019) Archival interventions and the language we use. Arch Sci 19(4):331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y

Yakel E (2003) Archival representation. Arch Sci 3:1–25