Pain shared, pain halved? Cooperation as a coping strategy for innovation barriers
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455.
Antonioli, D., Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2013). Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies. Research Policy, 42, 975–988.
Arrow K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council. (Eds.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Arvanitis, S. (2012). How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance? An analysis based in Swiss micro data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22, 981–1007.
Baldwin, J., & Lin, Z. (2002). Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Research Policy, 31, 1–18.
Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior. Technovation, 30, 195–206.
Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms: Evidence from the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33, 209–223.
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33, 1477–1492.
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2006). Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organisation, 28, 401–426.
Caloghirou, Y., Ioannides, S., & Vonortas, N. (2003). Research joint ventures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17, 541–570.
Canepa, A., & Stoneman, P. (2008). Financial constraints to innovation in the UK: Evidence from CIS2 and CIS3. Oxford Economic Papers, 60, 711–730.
Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92, 1169–1184.
Coad, A., Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2016). Barriers to innovation and firm productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25, 321–334.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Colombo, M., & Garrone, P. (1996). Technological cooperative agreements and firm’s R&D intensity. A note on causality relations. Research Policy, 25, 923–932.
D’Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, S. (2013). Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 537–558.
D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). What hampers innovation? Evidence from UK CIS4. SPRU electronic working paper series (SEWPS), no. 168 (February).
D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2012). What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Research Policy, 41, 482–488.
D’Este, P., Rentocchini, F., & Vega Jurado, J. (2014). Lowering barriers to engage in innovation: Evidence from the Spanish Innovation Survey. Industry and Innovation, 21, 1–19.
David, P., & Hall, B. (2000). Heart of darkness: Modelling public private funding interactions. Inside the R&D black Box. Working Paper 7538. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7538
De Faria, P., Lima, F., & Santos, R. (2010). Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners. Research Policy, 39, 1082–1092.
Franco, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2014). Absorptive capacity, proximity in cooperation and integration mechanisms. Empirical evidence from CIS data. Industry and Innovation, 21, 332–357.
Galia, F., & Legros, D. (2004). Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: Evidence from France. Research Policy, 33, 1185–1199.
Gallié, E.-P., & Roux, P. (2010). Forms and determinants of R&D collaborations: Evidence based on French data. Industry and Innovation, 17, 551–576.
Garcia-Quevedo, J., Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2014). Reviving demand-pull perspectives: The effect of demand uncertainty and stagnancy on R&D strategy. SPRU Working Paper 2014-09.
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567–586.
Hall, B. H., Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Montresor, S., & Vezzani, A. (2016). Financing constraints, R&D investments and innovative performances: New empirical evidence at the firm level for Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25, 183–196.
Hölzl, W., & Janger, J. (2013). Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 1450–1468.
Hölzl, W., & Janger, J. (2014). Distance to the frontier and the perception of innovation barriers across European countries. Research Policy, 43, 707–725.
Hottenrott, H., Rexhäuser, S., & Veugelers, R. (2014) Green innovations and organizational change: Making better use of environmental technology. ZEW-discussion paper 12-043
Iammarino, S., Sanna-Randaccio, R., & Savona, M. (2009). The perception of obstacles to innovation. Foreign multinationals and domestic firms in Italy. Revue d’économie Industrielle, 125, 75–104.
Kaiser, U. (2002). An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: Evidence for the German service sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 747–774.
Kleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. O. N. (1992). Why do firms cooperate in R&D? An empirical study. Research Policy, 21, 347–360.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43, 867–878.
Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38, 45–57.
López, A. (2008). Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 26, 113–136.
Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010), Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. UNU-MERIT working paper series, 2010-023.
Mancusi, M. L., & Vezzulli, A. (2010) R&D, innovation, and liquidity constraints. KITeS working papers 30/2010, Bocconi University.
Marzucchi, A., Antonioli, D., & Montresor, S. (2015). Industry–research co-operation within and across regional boundaries. What does innovation policy add? Papers in Regional Science., 94, 499–524.
Metcalfe, J. S. (2005). Systems failure and the case for innovation policy. In P. Llerena & M. Matt (Eds.), Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy (pp. 47–74). Berlin: Springer.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 179–208.
Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32, 1481–1499.
Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS2. Managerial and Decisions Economics, 24, 133–145.
Mohnen, P., & Röller, L.-H. (2005). Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review, 49, 1431–1450.
Mohnen, P., & Rosa, J. M. (2002). Barriers to innovation in service industries in Canada. In M. Feldman & N. Massard (Eds.), Institutions and systems in the geography of innovation (pp. 231–250). New York: Springer.
Mora Valentín, E. M. (2000). University–industry cooperation: a framework of benefits and obstacles. Industry and Higher Education, 14, 165–172. doi: 10.5367/000000000101295011 .
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technology overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implication for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27, 507–523.
Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2013). Is money all? Financing versus knowledge and demand constraints to innovation. UNU-MERIT WP series.
Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with Public Research Institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42, 149–166.
Savignac, F. (2008). Impact of financial constraints on innovation: What can be learned from a direct measure? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17, 553–569.
Schmidt, T. (2005). What determines absorptive capacity? Unpublished manuscript, ZEW, Mannheim.
Segarra-Blasco, A., & Arauzo-Carod, J.-M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry-university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37(8), 1283–1295.
Tether, B. (2002). Who cooperates for innovation and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, 947–967.
Tether, B., & Tajar, A. (2008a). Beyond university-industry links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37, 1079–1095.
Tether, B., & Tajar, A. (2008b). The organizational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms. Research Policy, 37, 720–739.
Tiwari, A., Mohnen, P., Palm, F., & Schim van der Loeff, S. (2008). Financial constraint and R&D investment: Evidence from CIS. In Determinants of innovative behaviours: A firm’s internal practice and its external environments (pp. 217–242), London.
Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28, 63–80.
Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 355–379.
Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25, 609–619.
Wu, J. (2012). Technological collaboration in product innovation: The role of market competition and sectoral technological intensity. Research Policy, 41, 489–496.