PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF ROAD-USER CHARGING

Bartley, 1995, ‘Mobility Impacts, Reactions and Opinions. Traffic Demand Management Options in Europe. The MIRO Project.’, Traffic Engineering and Control, 36, 596 Emmerink, 1995, ‘Is congestion-pricing a first-best strategy in transport policy? A critical review of arguments.’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, 581, 10.1068/b220581 Jones, 1995, ‘Road Pricing: The Public Viewpoint.’, 159 Jones, 1998, ‘Urban Road Pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation’, 263 Verhoef, E.T., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. ‘The trade-off between efficiency’ effectiveness, and social feasibility of regulating road transport externalities.' Transportation Planning and Technology 19 pp. 247–263 (1996). Verhoef, 1997, ‘The Social Feasibility of Road Pricing: A Case Study for the Randstad Area’, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 31, 255 Raux, 1998, ‘The simulation of behaviour in a non-experienced future: the case of urban road pricing.’, 67 Rietveld, 1998, ‘Social feasibility of policies to reduce externalities in transport.’, 285 Reinstra, S.A., Rietveld, P., Verhoef, E.T. ‘The Social Support for Policy Measures in Passenger Transport: A Statistical Analysis for the Netherlands.’ Transportation Research D 4 pp. 181–200. (1999). EUROPRICE Consortium ‘Priority Policy Issues Report: Technical Paper 2’ http://www.europrice-network.org. (2000). Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., Gärling, T. ‘Determinants of private-car users' acceptance of road pricing.’ Paper presented at the 9th International Association for Travel Behaviour Research Conference (Queensland, Australia) July (2000). Raux, C. ‘Acceptability factors and behavioural reactions to transport policy changes.’ Paper presented at the 9th International Association for Travel Behaviour Research Conference (Queensland, Australia) July (2000). Schlag, 2000, ‘Public acceptability of traffic demand management and pricing measures in Europe.’, Traffic Engineering and Control, 41, 314 Thorpe, N., Hills, P.J., Jaensirisak, S. ‘Public Attitudes to TDM Measures: A Comparative Study.’ Journal of Transport Policy 7 pp. 243–257. (2000). PRIMA Consoritum. ‘Ways and Means to Increase the Acceptance of Urban Road Pricing.’ Final Report to European Commission's 4th Framework Programme, Contract Number: RO-98-SC.3020 (Bruxelles). (2001). Harrington, 2001, ‘Overcoming public aversion to congestion pricing.’, Transportation Research A, 35, 87 Link, H., Polak, J.W. ‘How acceptable are transport pricing measures? Empirical studies in nine European countries.’ Paper presented at the European Transport Conference Seminar on Transport Pricing, Association for European Transport, Cambridge. September. (2001). Schade, J. ‘Acceptability of marginal cost pricing in urban transport.’ Paper presented at NECTAR Conference No.6 Helsinki, Finland. May. (2001). Cain, A., Celikel, N., Jones, P.M. ‘Incorporating public participation in the detailed design of a congestion charging scheme for Edinburgh.’ Paper presented at the 34th Annual Universities' Transport Study Group meeting, Edinburgh. January. (2002). Jaensirisak, S. ‘Public acceptability of road-user charging schemes based on a voting behaviour model.’ Paper presented at the 34th Annual Universities' Transport Study Group meeting, Edinburgh. January. (2002). Goodwin, 1989, ‘The “Rule Of Three”: A Possible Solution To The Political Problem Of Competing Objectives For Road Pricing.’, Traffic Engineering & Control, 30, 495 Siegal, 1988 Larsen, 1988, ‘The Toll Ring in Bergen, Norway – the first year of operation’, Traffic Engineering and Control, 27, 216 Solheim, 1992, 48 Tretvik, T. ‘The Trondheim Toll Ring: Applied Technology And Public Opinion.’ Paper presented at the Conference on ‘The Use Of Economic Instruments In Urban Travel Management. Different Ways Of Charging Traffic At Local Level And Its Implementation.’ Collection of papers edited by Frey, R.L., Langloh, P.M. Basel, Switzerland. WWZ Report 37 pp. 69–78. June. (1992). Odeck, 1997, ‘On public attitudes to the implementation of toll-roads – the case of the Oslo toll-ring’, Journal of Transport Policy, 4, 73, 10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00008-5