PROTDES: CHARMM toolbox for computational protein design

Archontis G, Simonson T (2005) A residue-pairwise generalized born scheme, suitable for protein design simulations. J Phys Chem B 109:22667–22673 Beamer L, Pabo C (1992) Refined 1.8 angstrom crystal structure of the lambda repressor operator complex. J Mol Biol 227:177–196 Bolon D, Mayo S (2001) Enzyme-like proteins by computational design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14274–14279 Bowie J, Lathy R, Heisenberg D (1991) A method to identify protein sequences folding into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253:164–170 Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M (1983) Charmm: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 4(2):187–217 Cheng TMK, Lu Y-E, Vendruscolo M, Pietro L, Blundell TL (2008) Prediction by graph theoretic measures of structural effects in proteins arising from non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms. PLoS Comput Biol 4(7):e1000135 Chowdry AB, Reynolds KA, Hanes MS, Vorhies M, Pokala N, Handel TM (2007) An object-oriented library for computational protein design. J Comp Chem 28(14):2378–2388 Dahiyat B, Mayo S (1996) Protein design automation. Protein Sci 5:895–903 Dahiyat C, Sarisky BI, Mayo S (1997) De-novo protein design: towards fully automated sequence selection. J Mol Biol 273(4):789–796 DeLano WL (2002) The pymol molecular graphics system Desjarlais JR, Handel TM (1999) Hydrophobic core design and structure prediction with backbone flexibility. J Mol Biol 189:305–318 Doig AJ, Sternberg MJE (1995) Side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. Protein Sci 4:2247–2251 Dunbrack RL, Karplus M (1994) Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains. Nat Struct Biol 1(5):334–340 Haliloglu T, Seyrek E, Erman B (2008) Prediction of binding sites in receptor-ligand complexes with the gaussian network model. Phys Rev Lett 100(22):228102–228106 Hansch C, Fujita T (1964) p-σ−π analysis. a method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structurecomputational design of a biologically active enzyme. J Am Chem Soc 86:1616–1626 Hellinga HW, Richards FM (1994) Optimal sequence selection in proteins of known structure by simulated evolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 91(13):5803–5807 Huang C, Stultz A (2007) Conformational sampling with implicit solvent models: application to the phf6 peptide in tau protein. Biophys J 92:34–45 Jaramillo A, Wodak SJ (2005) Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models. Biophys J 88(1):156–171 Jaramillo A, Wernisch L, Hery S, Wodak S (2002) Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99(21):13554–13559 Kuhlman B, Baker D (2000) Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(19):10383–10388 Lazaridis T, Karplus M (1999) Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35(3):133–152 Lee MS, Salsbury FR, Brooks CL (2002) Novel generalized born methods. J Comp Chem 116:10606–10614 Lippow SM, Tidor B (2007) Progress in computational protein design. Current Opin Biotechnol 18(4):305–311 Looger LL, Dwyer MA, Smith JJ, Hellinga HW (2003) Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 423(6936):185–190 Lopes A, Alexandrov A, Bathelt C, Archontis G, Simonson T (2007) Computational sidechain placement and protein mutagenesis with implicit solvent models. Proteins 67(4):853–867 López de la Paz M, Serrano L (2004) Sequence determinants of amyloid fibril formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(1):87–92 Madden DR (1995) The 3-dimensional structure of peptide-mhc complexes. Annu Rev Immunol 13:587–622 Madden DR, Garboczi DN, Wiley D (1993) The antigenic identity of peptide-mhc complexes: a comparison of the conformations of five viral peptides presented by hla-. Cell 75:693–708 Ogata K, Jaramillo A, Cohen W, Briand J-P, Connan F, Choppin J, Muller S, Wodak SJ (2002) Automatic sequence design of mhc class-i binding peptides impairing cd8+ t cell recognition. J Biol Chem 278(2):1281–1290 Ooi T, Oobatake M, Nemethy G, Scheraga H (1987) Accesible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamics parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:3086–3090 Röthlisberger D, Khersonsky O, Wollacott AM, Jiang L, Dechancie J, Betker J, Gallaher JL, Althoff EA, Zanghellini A, Dym O, Albeck S, Houk KN, Tawfik DS, Baker D (2008) Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453:190–195 Schleif R (2006) Analysis of protein structure and function: a Beginner’s guide to CHARMM. http://gene.bio.jhu.edu Selz KA, Samoylova TI, Samoylov AM, Vodyanoy VI, Mandell AJ (2007) Designing allosteric peptide ligands targeting a globular protein. Biopolymers 85(1):38–59 Sood V, Baker D (2006) Recapitulation and design of protein binding peptide structures and sequences. J Mol Biol 357:917–927 Su A, Mayo SL (1997) Coupling backbone flexibility and amino acid sequence selection in protein design. Protein Sci 6:1701–1707 Sunhwan J, Taehoon K, Vidyashankara GI, Wonpil I (2008) CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J Comput Chem 29(11):1859–1865 Tuffery P, Etchebest C, Hazout S, Lavery R (1991) A new approach to the rapid determination of sidechains. J Biomol Struct Dyn 8:1267–1289 Wernisch L, Hery S, Wodak S (2000) Automatic protein design with all atom force-fields by exact and heuristic optimization. J Mol Biol 301(3):713–736