PROCESSUS – Integration of SEI CMM and ISO quality models

Software Quality Journal - 1997
Ivan Rozman1, Romana Vajde Horvat1, JÓzsef GyÓrkÓs1, Marjan Hericùko1
1Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Institute of Informatics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

Tóm tắt

Integration of the two best-known quality management models for software production and maintenance, the Capability Maturity Model and the ISO 9001 Model (including ISO 9000-3) is of great interest for both the European and the American software market. The definition of a quality management model which would conform to the requirements of both models and use the advantages of each was a key goal of our research work within the project PROCESSUS.1 Research work was conducted in two steps: first, the detailed comparison of both models was made in order to define their common issues and specifics of each model, and secondly, the integrated model based on the results of the comparison was defined. In this paper the comparison method and results are described. Further, a method for the integration and a framework of the integrated model are presented. The core of our work is actually the content of the integrated model. Due to extensive content of the integrated model examples of some parts only are given in the appendix. The integrated model presented in this paper has already been successfully used in organizations which are cooperating in the project PROCESSUS o these organizations achieved the needed maturity for certification to the ISO 9001 standard and a maturity level near level 3 of CMM.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

M.C. Paulk, C.V. Weber, S. Garcia, M.B. Chrissis and M. Bush, Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-93-TR25, February 1993.

M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis and C.V. Weber, Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1,Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, February 1993.

W.S. Humphrey, Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989

M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis, C.V. Weber, Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, IEEE Software, 10(1993), 18-27.

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9001, Quality Systems - Model for quality assurance in design/development, production, installation, and servicing ,ISO 9001:1994 (E), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994.

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9000-3, Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001 to the development, supply and maintenance of software, ISO 9000-3:1991 (E), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.

I. Rozman, R. Vajde Horvat and J. Györkös, United view on ISO 9000 model and SEI CMM, IEMC 94- International Management Conference, IEEE Press, 1994, pp. 56-63.

TickIT, Guide to Software Quality Management System Construction and Certification, Department of Trade and Industry and the British Computer Society, Issue 2.0, 28 February 1992.

V. Haase and R. Mesnarz, BOOTSTRAP: Fine Tuning Process Assessment, IEEE Software, July (1994) 25-35.

A. Dorling, SPICE: Software Process Improvement and Capability determination, Software Quality Journal , 2(1993) 209-224.

R. Bamford and W.J. Deibler, Exploring the Relationship between ISO 9001 and the SEI Capability Maturity Model for Software Engineering Organization, SSQS Software System Quality Consulting, (1993).

M.C. Paulk. How ISO 9001 compares with the CMM, IEEE Software, January (1995) 74-83.

B. Stiglic, Software reusability in intelligent information systems, Re-Technologies for Information Systems, Conference Proceedings ReTIS'95, R. Oldenburg Wien München 1995, pp. 199-208.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Software Quality Journal

Thông tin tác giả