POM research productivity in U.S. business schools
Tóm tắt
This study examines the publication output of individuals and business schools in the field of Production and Operations Management (POM). A ranking system was devised based upon publications in the leading POM journals. Two ranking approaches were applied to business schools: productivity and quality. Articles were counted in two ways: one ranking counted each article as one unit, and authors “shared” the unit equally, and the second ranking gave each contributor credit for one “distributed” unit.
These are the first publication productivity rankings for the field of POM, and are based upon publications in the years 1989–1993.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andrews W.T., 1978, Leading accounting departments revisited, Accounting Review, 53, 135
10.1016/0272-6963(91)90022-P
10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X
Hayes R.H., 1984, Restoring Our Competitive Edge
10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb02535.x
Jacobs F.A., 1986, Publication productivity of doctoral alumni, The Accounting Review, 61, 179
10.2307/1058916
10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8
Schonberger R., 1982, Japanese Manufacturing Techniques
Stahl M.J., 1988, Publication in leading management journals as a measure of institutional research productivity, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 707, 10.2307/256468
10.5465/amr.1991.4279634
S.T.Young W.S.Blumenfeld C.H.St. John J.P.Angelidis.A ranking of management departments based on publications in prestigious management journals: A comparison of two approachesProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association.1986.