POM research productivity in U.S. business schools

Journal of Operations Management - Tập 14 - Trang 41-53 - 1996
Scott T. Young1, Brad C. Baird1, Madeleine E. Pullman1
1University of Utah, David Eccles School of Business, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis study examines the publication output of individuals and business schools in the field of Production and Operations Management (POM). A ranking system was devised based upon publications in the leading POM journals. Two ranking approaches were applied to business schools: productivity and quality. Articles were counted in two ways: one ranking counted each article as one unit, and authors “shared” the unit equally, and the second ranking gave each contributor credit for one “distributed” unit.These are the first publication productivity rankings for the field of POM, and are based upon publications in the years 1989–1993.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrews W.T., 1978, Leading accounting departments revisited, Accounting Review, 53, 135 10.1016/0272-6963(91)90022-P 10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X Hayes R.H., 1984, Restoring Our Competitive Edge 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb02535.x Jacobs F.A., 1986, Publication productivity of doctoral alumni, The Accounting Review, 61, 179 10.2307/1058916 10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8 Schonberger R., 1982, Japanese Manufacturing Techniques Stahl M.J., 1988, Publication in leading management journals as a measure of institutional research productivity, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 707, 10.2307/256468 10.5465/amr.1991.4279634 S.T.Young W.S.Blumenfeld C.H.St. John J.P.Angelidis.A ranking of management departments based on publications in prestigious management journals: A comparison of two approachesProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association.1986.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Operations Management

Tập 14

41-53

Thông tin tác giả