PART 7: EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPOSITE REPAIRS APPLIED TO DAMAGED PIPELINE

Julliana Cariry Palhano Freire1, Robson D. Vieira1, Jorge L. C. Diniz1, Luiz Cláudio de Marco Meniconi1
11J.L.F. Freire (SEM member) and R.D. Vieira are with the Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, Brazil. 2J.L.C. Diniz is with Fluke Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 3L.C. Meniconi is affiliated with the Petrobras Research Center, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1. API Recommended Practice 579, Fitness-For-Service, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC (2000).

Anderson, 2000, “API 579: A Comprehensive Fitness-For-Service Guide,”, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 77, 953, 10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00018-7

3. API Specification 5L, Specification for Line Pipe, 43rd Edition, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC (2004).

Freire, 2006, “Experimental Strain Analysis of Metal Loss Defects in Pipeline,”, Experimental Techniques, 30, 42, 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00085.x

5. ASME, ASME-B31G, Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines-A Supplement to ANSI/ASME B31 Code for Pressure Piping, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (1991).

6. ASME B31.4, Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons and other Liquids, The American Society for Mechanical Engineers, New York (2002).

DNV, 1999, Corroded Pipelines-Recommended Practice RP-F101

Freire, 2006, “Experimental Techniques in the Field of Pipeline Integrity,”, Experimental Techniques, 30, 44, 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00062.x