PARENTS AND PRESCHOOL SERVICES: ISSUES OF PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT

Emerald - Tập 10 Số 1 - Trang 1-13 - 1990
GillScott1
1Department of Sociology, Glasgow College

Tóm tắt

The debates on welfare provision in Britain are both familiar and well documented. (Loney, Boswell & Clarke 1984, Mishra 1984). It has been pointed out, however, by recent analysts (Barrett & Mcintosh 1982, Dale & Foster 1986) that quite different analyses of the deficiencies of the present system share common assumptions regarding the family. It will be argued here that this is particularly clear in current debates concerning parental involvement in pre school provision. Parental involvement has become a political catchphrase in the 1980's. It has been taken up by right and left, by community activists and central government. Much of the discussion, however, is underpinned by a particular view of the family. For the New Right the family is a focal point for much that is wrong in contemporary British society (Fitzgerald 1983). Parental involvement, here, is seen as a right and a duty for parents as well as a way to offset the reduction in individual responsibilities that have occurred with an invasive welfare state. The Left has also tended to view families in individualistic ways but has sought to redistribute educational opportunities through supporting parents to understand, use and make demands on overly centralised educational system e.g. Plowden 1967, Strathclyde Regional Council 1985. Parental involvement becomes a right and away to improve parents resources. The difficulties with these prescriptions, from Left and Right, is that their conceptualisation of the family ignores the realities of families and childcare, particularly in relation to women (David 1985, Wilson 1983). Thus they fail to take into account how these realities affect the way in which parents use and respond to parental involvement strategies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Barrett M., 1982, The Anti Social Family

Central Advisory Council for Education, 1967, Children and their primary schools

Clarke M., 1988, Children Under Five: Educational Research and Evidence, Gordon and Breach

Cohen B., 1988, Gender and Life Cycle' Work, Employment and Society, 1, 326

David, M. (1983) 'Day Care Policies and Parenting; Journal of Social Policy, Vol11, pp.81-92.

David M., 1985, Critical Social Policy, 12, 1985

De Ath E., 1985, Self Help and Family Centres

De Ath E., 1985, National Childrens Bureau, 1985

Eisenstadt N., 1986, N. & France, P. Untying the Apron Strings

Department of Education and Science, 1975, Preschool Education and Care: some topics requiring research or development projects

10.1007/978-1-349-16486-8

10.1017/S0047279400022790

Fitzgerald T., M. et al (eds) (1983) Social Policy and Welfare

Fruchter N., 1984, Social Policy

Graham H., 1984, Harvester.

Haystead J., 1980, Preschool education and care, Hodder and Stoughton

Leach P., 1979, Who Cares

Loney M., 1983, Social Policy and Social Welfare

Martin J., 1984, Women and Employment: a Lifetime Perspective

Mishra R., 1984, Wheatsheaf.

New C., 1985, For the Childrens' Sake

Parker R., 1984, R. et al Families in Britain

Plowden, 1982, Address to Preschool Playgroup Association's 21st AGM

Roll J., 1986, Babies and Money: Birth Trends and Costs

Scott G., 1985, Department of Sociology/Glasgow College.

Scott G., 1986, Scottish Pre-School Playgroup Association. Strathclyde Pilot Schemes

Scottish Pre School Playgroup Association, 1986, Strathclyde Pilot Schemes: a Report of the First 3 Years

Smith T., 1984, Grant Macintyre.

Strathclyde Regional Council, 1985, Under Fives Final Report of the Officer Member Group

Tizard B., 1984, Fontana.