P3P: a software suite for autonomous SHM of bridge networks

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring - Tập 13 - Trang 1577-1594 - 2022
Enrique García-Macías1,2, Antonello Ruccolo3, Mariano Angelo Zanini4, Carlo Pellegrino4, Carmelo Gentile3, Filippo Ubertini1, Paolo Mannella5
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
2Department of Structural Mechanics and Hydraulic Engineering, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
3Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
4Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
5Directorate of Operation and Territorial Coordination, ANAS S.p.A., Rome, Italy

Tóm tắt

This paper presents the development of a new software code for the fully autonomous management of permanent integrated Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems installed in highway bridge structures. The code was developed within the framework of a research project funded by Anas S.p.A., the largest public infrastructure manager in Italy. The software program includes all the necessary steps to conduct SHM within the statistical pattern recognition paradigm, including automated dynamic identification, modal tracking, filtering of environmental effects, and damage detection through novelty analysis. Additionally, the software suite includes specific modules for processing and analysis of seismic events and structural reliability analysis of bridges, as well as specific functionalities for span-wise identification of long multi-span bridges. Moreover, a novel automated density-based tracking algorithm is developed. The potential of P3P is illustrated through two real application case studies: (i) a long multi-span bridge, the Trigno V Bridge in Italy; and (ii) the Z-24 Bridge benchmark. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of the developed code for handling large monitoring databases within the framework of SHM as a statistical pattern recognition, and currently P3P is in phase of being applied by Anas S.p.A for the management of a large number of bridges of the Italian roadway system.

Tài liệu tham khảo

ASCE (2021) 2021 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. Technical report, American Society of Civil Engineers Woodward R, Cullington DW, Daly AF, Vassie PR, Haardt P, Kashner R, Astudillo R, Velando C, Godart B, Cremona C (2001) Bridge management in Europe (BRIME)–Deliverable D14–Final Report. Technical report Moreu F, Li X, Li S, Zhang D (2018) Technical specifications of structural health monitoring for highway bridges: new Chinese structural health monitoring code. Front Built Environ 4:10 ISIS Canada (2001) Guidelines for Structural Health Monitoring. pages 539–541. ISIS Canada Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici. Linee guida per la classificazione e gestione del rischio, la valutazione della sicurezza ed il monitoraggio dei ponti esistenti, (2020) Moore M, Phares BM, Graybeal B, Rolander D, Washer G, Wiss J (2001) Reliability of visual inspection for highway bridges, vol I. Technical report, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Gkoumas K, Dos Santos FL Marques, Van Balen M, Tsakalidis A, Hortelano A Ortega, Grosso M, Haq G, Pekár F (2019) Research and innovation in bridge maintenance, inspection and monitoring. Publications Office of the European Union Fuentes R, Cross EJ, Gardner PA, Bull LA, Rogers TJ, Barthorpe RJ, Shi H, Dervilis N, Farrar CR, Worden K (2020) Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Identification. Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics. Springer Nature, Berlin, pp 1–72 Fritzen CP (2005) Vibration-based structural health monitoring-concepts and applications. Key Eng Mater 293:3–20 Bin ZF, Chao OZ, Yee KS (2020) A review of operational modal analysis techniques for in-service modal identification. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42(8):1–18 Saisi A, Gentile C, Guidobaldi M (2015) Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua. Italy. Constr Build Mater 81:101–112 Gentile C, Saisi A (2015) Continuous dynamic monitoring of a centenary iron bridge for structural modification assessment. Front Struct Civil Eng 9(1):26–41 Lon Wah Soo W, Chen YT, Roberts GW, Elamin A (2018) Separating damage from environmental effects affecting civil structures for near real-time damage detection. Struct Health Monit 17(4):850–868 Ubertini F, Cavalagli N, Kita A, Comanducci G (2018) Assessment of a monumental masonry bell-tower after 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence by long-term SHM. B Earthq Eng 16(2):775–801 Ubertini F, Gentile C, Materazzi AL (2013) Automated modal identification in operational conditions and its application to bridges. Eng Struct 46:264–278 Zini G, Betti M, Bartoli G (2022) A quality-based automated procedure for operational modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 164:108173 Charbonnel PÉ (2021) Fuzzy-driven strategy for fully automated modal analysis: application to the SMART2013 shaking-table test campaign. Mech Syst Signal Process 152:107388 Cheema P, Alamdari MM, Vio GA, Zhang FL, Kim CW (2021) Infinite mixture models for operational modal analysis: an automated and principled approach. J Sound Vib 491:115757 He Y, Yang JP, Li XF (2022) A three-stage automated modal identification framework for bridge parameters based on frequency uncertainty and density clustering. Eng Struct 255:113891 Tronci EM, De Angelis M, Betti R, Altomare V (2022) Multi-stage semi-automated methodology for modal parameters estimation adopting parametric system identification algorithms. Mech Syst Signal Process 165:108317 Gharehbaghi VR, Farsangi Noroozinejad E, Noori M, Yang TY, Li S, Nguyen A, Málaga-Chuquitaype C, Gardoni P, Mirjalili S (2022) A critical review on structural health monitoring: definitions, methods, and perspectives. Arch Computat Methods Eng 29:2209–2235 Farrar CR, Worden K (2012) Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. John Wiley & Sons, New York Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Kiranyaz S, Hussein M, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2021) A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications. Mech Syst Signal Process 147:107077 Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(2):149–171 Kita A, Cavalagli N, Ubertini F (2019) Temperature effects on static and dynamic behavior of Consoli Palace in Gubbio, Italy. Mech Syst Signal Process 120:180–202 Gardner P, Bull LA, Dervilis N, Worden K (2022) Domain-adapted Gaussian mixture models for population-based structural health monitoring. J Civ Struct Health Monit 12:1343–1353 García-Macías E, Ubertini F (2022) Integrated SHM systems: damage detection through unsupervised learning and data fusion. Structural health monitoring based on data science techniques. Springer, Cham, pp 247–268 Cremona C, Santos J (2018) Structural health monitoring as a big-data problem. Struct Eng Int 28(3):243–254 García-Macías E, Ubertini F (2022) Least Angle Regression for early-stage identification of earthquake-induced damage in a monumental masonry palace: Palazzo dei Consoli. Eng Struct 259:114119 Reynders E, Schevenels M, De Roeck G (2011) MACEC 3.2: a Matlab toolbox for experimental and operational modal analysis-user’s manual. Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven Test LMS (2015) Lab Modal Analysis User Manual. Siemens Industry Software NV Structural Vibration Solutions, Aalborg, Denmark (2006) ARTeMIS Extractor Pro User’s Manual, Release 3.5 García-Macías E, Ubertini F (2020) MOVA/MOSS: Ttwo integrated software solutions for comprehensive structural health monitoring of structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 143:106830 Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) One-year monitoring of the Z 24-Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(2):149–171 Maeck J, De Roeck G (2003) Description of Z24 benchmark. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(1):127–131 Juang JN (1994) Applied system identification. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA Magalhães F, Cunha Á (2011) Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(5):1431–1450 Van Overschee P, De Moor B (2012) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory-implementation-applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G (2014) Operational modal analysis of civil engineering structures. Springer, New York, p 143 Reynders E, De Roeck G (2008) Reference-based combined deterministic-stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(3):617–637 Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G (2014) Influence of model order and number of block rows on accuracy and precision of modal parameter estimates in stochastic subspace identification. Int J Lifecycle Perform Eng 1(4):317–334 Pappa RS, Elliott KB, Schenk A (1993) Consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm. J Guid Control Dyn 16(5):852–858 Pastor M, Binda M, Harčarik T (2012) Modal assurance criterion. Procedia Eng 48:543–548 Zhou YL, Wahab MA, Maia NMM, Liu L, Figueiredo E (2019) Data mining in structural dynamic analysis: a signal processing perspective. Springer, Singapore Buckley T, Ghosh B, Pakrashi V (2022) A feature extraction & selection benchmark for structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 14759217221111141 Favarelli E, Giorgetti A (2020) Machine learning for automatic processing of modal analysis in damage detection of bridges. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–13 Bishop CM, Nasrabadi NM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, NewYork Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464 Peeters Bart (2000) System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. PhD thesis, KU Leuven Magalhães F (2010) Operational modal analysis for testing and monitoring of bridges and special structures. PhD thesis, University of Porto Hotteling H (1947) Multivariate quality control, illustrated by the air testing of sample bombsights. In: Techniques of statistical analysis. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, pp 111–184 Aggiornamento delle (2018) “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni” D.M. 17 gennaio 2018 (in Italian). Italian Ministry of Infrastructure JCSS Probabilistic Model Code (2001) Joint Committee for Structural Safety. ISBN: 978-3-909386-79-6 Steenackers G, Guillaume P (2005) Structural health monitoring of the Z24 Bridge in presence of environmental changes using modal analysis. In Proceedings of IMAC, vol 23 Zhang J, Reynders E, De Roeck G, Lombaert G (2019) Model updating of periodic structures based on free wave characteristics. J Sound Vib 442:281–307 EMPA work package (1999) SIMCES Task A1 & A2 Longterm Monitoring and Bridge Tests. Technical report, Dübendorf, Switzerland