Ownership and Management Issues Associated With Family Firm Performance and Company Objectives

Family Business Review - Tập 19 Số 4 - Trang 301-316 - 2006
Paul Westhead1, Carole Howorth2
1Warwick Business School, Coventry, England
2Institute for Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster, England,

Tóm tắt

Agency and stewardship theories are used to explore associations between ownership and management profiles and the performance and objectives of family firms. Using data from privately held family firms in the United Kingdom, a range of performance measures and objectives were examined. Multivariate regression analysis detected that closely held family firms did not report superior firm performance. The results show that the management rather than the ownership structure of a family firm was generally associated with selected firm-performance indicators and nonfinancial company objectives. Although family CEOs were associated with lower propensity to export, presented evidence generally fails to suggest that private family firms should avoid employing family members in management roles.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00036.x

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00010-7

10.1177/08944865030160030601

10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00076-X

Blondell, C., Carlock, R.S. & Van der Heyden, L. (2000). Fair process: Seeking justice in family firms. In P. Poutziouris (Ed.), Tradition or enterprise in the new economy? (pp. 33-46). Manchester: University of Manchester, Manchester Business School.

Casson, M., 1982, The entrepreneur: An economic theory

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00049.x

Chrisman, J.J., 2003, Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00080.x

10.1177/104225879902300402

10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00089.x

Daily, C.M., 1995, Journal of Business Strategies, 12, 50, 10.54155/jbs.12.1.50-68

10.1016/0883-9026(92)90014-I

10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258

Department of Trade and Industry., 2001, Opportunity for all in a world of change: A white paper on enterprise, skills and innovation

10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

10.1086/467037

10.1086/467038

10.1016/0304-405X(85)90045-5

10.1177/104225870002400401

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00056-9

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00209.x

10.5465/amr.2002.5922406

10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.002

10.1080/13571519984304

10.1177/104225870002500202

10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00635.x

Klein, S.B., Paper presented at Family Enterprise Research Conference

10.1111/0022-1082.00115

10.2307/30040615

Litz, R.A., Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Best Papers, Entrepreneurship

10.1177/104225879702100304

10.1177/104225879902300404

10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00015

10.1002/smj.4250140205

10.1007/978-1-349-14465-5

Nyman, S., 1978, Oxford Economic Papers, 30, 82

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00013-2

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00054-5

Sharma, P., Presented at the Academy of Management meetings

10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x

10.2307/1061230

Smyrnios, K., 1994, The Price Waterhouse/Commonwealth Bank family business survey 1994

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00046.x

Storey, D.J., 1994, Understanding the small business sector

Stoy Hayward., 1989, Staying the course: Survival characteristics of the family owned business

10.1111/0447-2778.00006

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00323.x

10.1177/014920639802400205

10.1177/104225879802300102

10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00369.x

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00051.x