Overview of colorectal resections in a reference center in Curitiba – Brazil: Experience with open and laparoscopic approach

Journal of Coloproctology - Tập 38 - Trang 50-55 - 2018
Micheli Fortunato Domingos1, Renato Valmassoni Pinho1, Júlio Cezar Uili Coelho1, Guilherme Figueiró Ferronatto1, Mariane Christina Savio1, Caroline Blum1, Andre Gubert Weiss1, Yan Sacha Hass Aguilera1
1Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Departamento de Cirurgia, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

Tóm tắt

Abstract Introduction Minimally invasive approach has become the preferential option for the treatment of surgical diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract, due to its numerous advantages. However, in the Colorectal Surgery field, the acceptance of videolaparoscopy was slower. For example, an American study showed that the percentage of laparoscopic cholecystectomy increased from 2.5% in 1988 to 73.7% in 1992, the rate of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy increased from 4.3% in 2000 to only 7.6% in 2004. Objecties Our goal was to compare several variables between patients submitted to colorectal resections performed through open surgery or videolaparoscopy. Methods This is a retrospective observational study performed in a Teaching Private Hospital of the City of Curitiba, Brazil, with the revision of 395 medical charts of patients subjected to colorectal resections from January 2011 through June 2016. Results 349 patients were included in the study. 243 (69.6%) were subjected to laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) and 106 (30.4%) to open colon resection (OCR). Mean age was 62.2 years for patients undergoing LCR and 68.8 year for OCR (p = 0.0082). Among emergency procedures, 92.5% consisted of OCR and 7.5% were LCRs. Surgery duration was similar in both types of access (196 min in OCR versus 195 min in LCR; p = 0.9864). Diet introduction was earlier in laparoscopic surgery and anastomotic fistula rate was similar in both groups (OCR 7.5% and LCR 6.58%; p = 0.7438). Hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing laparoscopic resections (7.53 ± 7.3 days) than in the ones undergoing open surgery (17.2 ± 19.3) (p < 0.001). In the OCR group, 70 patients needed ICU admission (66%), and stayed a mean of 12.3 days under intensive care. In the LCR group, however, only 30 needed ICU (12.3%), and the ones who needed it stayed a mean of 5.6 days (p < 0.001). Conclusions Videolaparoscopic approach is a safe and effective option in the treatment of colorectal diseases. Surgery duration and anastomotic fistula rates are similar to the open resections. Hospital stay and ICU stay durations, however, were shorter in patients submitted to laparoscopic colectomies.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jacobs, 1991, Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy), Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1, 144 van der Pas, 2013, Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 14, 210, 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0 Bonjer, 2015, A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer, N Engl J Med, 372, 1324, 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882 Veldkamp, 2005, Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial, Lancet Oncol, 6, 477, 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7 Gervaz, 2010, A prospective, randomized single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis, Ann Surg, 252, 3, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dbb5a5 Walsh, 1993, Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignancy, Aust N Z J Surg, 63, 563, 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00454.x Stocchi, 1998, Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update, J Surg Oncol, 68, 255, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199808)68:4<255::AID-JSO10>3.0.CO;2-Z Stocchi, 2000, Wound recurrences following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer, Arch Surg, 135, 948, 10.1001/archsurg.135.8.948 Nandakumar, 2010, Laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer, Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 23, 51, 10.1055/s-0030-1247856 Xie, 2015, Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarian patients, Medicine (Baltimore), 94, e1765, 10.1097/MD.0000000000001765 Murray, 2016, Benefit of mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colorectal surgery: current insights, Langenbecks Arch Surg, 401, 573, 10.1007/s00423-016-1461-9 Althumairi, 2016, Benefits of bowel preparation beyond surgical site infection, Ann Surg, 264, 1051, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001576 Kiran, 2015, Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery, Ann Surg, 262, 416, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001416 Kim, 2014, A statewide colectomy experience: the role of full bowel preparation in preventing surgical site infection, Ann Surg, 259, 310, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a62643 Murray, 2016, Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy, Surg Endosc, 30, 5275, 10.1007/s00464-016-4875-0 Krarup, 2012, A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery, Colorectal Dis, 14, e661, 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03079.x Arezzo, 2013, Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis, Surg Endosc, 27, 1485, 10.1007/s00464-012-2649-x Kang, 2013, Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer, JAMA Surg, 148, 65, 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2 Shekarriz, 2015, Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: are 75% preventable?, Int J Colorectal Dis, 30, 1525, 10.1007/s00384-015-2338-z Frasson, 2016, Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients, Int J Colorectal Dis, 31, 105, 10.1007/s00384-015-2376-6 Rahbari, 2010, Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer, Surgery, 147, 339, 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012 Trencheva, 2013, Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection, Ann Surg, 257, 108, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cd
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Coloproctology

Tập 38

50-55

Thông tin tác giả