Overcoming the fragility – X-ray computed micro-tomography elucidates brachiopod endoskeletons
Tóm tắt
The calcareous shells of brachiopods offer a wealth of informative characters for taxonomic and phylogenetic investigations. In particular scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used for decades to visualise internal structures of the shell. However, to produce informative SEM data, brachiopod shells need to be opened after chemical removal of the soft tissue. This preparation occasionally damages the shell. Additionally, skeletal elements of taxonomic/systematic interest such as calcareous spicules which are loosely embedded in the lophophore and mantle connective tissue become disintegrated during the preparation process. Using a nondestructive micro-computed tomography (μCT) approach, the entire fragile endoskeleton of brachiopods is documented for the first time. New insights on the structure and position of tissue-bound skeletal elements (spicules) are given as add ons to existing descriptions of brachiopod shell anatomy, thereby enhancing the quality and quantity of informative characters needed for both taxonomic and phylogenetic studies. Here, we present five modern, articulated brachiopods (Rectocalathis schemmgregoryi n. gen., n. sp., Eucalathis sp., Gryphus vitreus, Liothyrella neozelanica and Terebratulina retusa) that were X-rayed using a Phoenix Nanotom XS 180 NF. We provide links to download 3D models of these species, and additional five species with spicules can be accessed in the Supplemental Material. In total, 17 brachiopod genera covering all modern articulated subgroups and 2 inarticulated genera were X-rayed for morphological analysis. Rectocalathis schemmgregoryi n. gen., n. sp. is fully described. Micro-CT is an excellent non-destructive tool for investigating calcified structures in the exo- and endoskeletons of brachiopods. With high quality images and interactive 3D models, this study provides a comprehensive description of the profound differences in shell anatomy, facilitates the detection of new delicate morphological characters of the endoskeleton and gives new insights into the body plan of modern brachiopods.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Griesshaber E, SchmahI W, Neuser R, Job R, Blüm M, Brand U: Microstructure of Brachiopod Shells - An Inorganic/Organic Fibre Composite with Nanocrystalline Protective Layer. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 2005, 844. 1999, Materials Research Society, Warrendale, Pa, 2005-
Williams A, Wright AD: The origin of the loop in articulate brachiopods. Palaeontology. 1961, 3: 149-176.
Williams A, James MA, Emig CC, MacKay S, Rhodes MC: Anatomy. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H: Brachiopoda, Revised, Volume 1. Edited by Kaesler RL. ᅟ. Boulder C, Lawrence K: The Geological Society of America and University of Kansas; 1997:7–188.
Williams A: A history of skeletal secretion among articulate brachiopods. Lethaia. 1968, 1: 268-287. 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1968.tb01741.x.
Prenant M: Notes histologiques sur Terebratulina caput-serpentis Linnaeus. Bull Soc Zool France. 1928, 53: 113-125.
Schumann D: Mesodermale Endoskelette terebratulider Brachiopoden. Paläontol Z. 1973, 47: 77-103. 10.1007/BF02989564.
Eudes-Deslongchamps ME: Recherches sur l’organisation du manteau chez les brachiopodes articulés et principalement sur les spicules calcaires contenus dans son intérieur. Dissertation, Préparateur de Géologie à la Faculté des Sciences de Paris. Edited by: Savy F. 1864, Le Blanc-Hardel F, Caen, 1-35.
Blochmann F: Zur Systematik und geographischen Verbreitung der Brachiopoden. Z Wiss Zool. 1908, 90: 596-644.
Hancock A: On the organization of the Brachiopoda. Phil Trans R Soc Lond. 1858, 184: 791-869. 10.1098/rstl.1858.0034.
Blochmann F: Neue Brachiopoden der Valdivia- und Gaußexpedition. Zool Anz. 1906, 30: 690-720.
Lacaze-Duthiers H: Histoire naturelle des Brachiopodes vivants de la Mediterranée. Ann Sci Nat Zool (serie 4). 1861, 15: 259-330.
Thomson A: Brachiopoda of the Australasian Antarctic Expedition. Scientific reports, ser C. 1918, 4 (3): 1-76.
James MA: Brachiopoda: internal anatomy, embryology, and development. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Volume 13: Lophophorata, Entoprocta, and Cycliophora. Edited by: Harrison FW, Woollacott RM. 1997, Wiley-Liss, New York, 297-407.
Neall VE: Systematics of the endemic New Zealand brachiopod Neothyris. J Royal Soc New Zealand. 1972, 2: 229-247. 10.1080/03036758.1972.10429376.
Laurin B, Gaspard D: Variations morphologiques et croissance du brachiopode abyssal Macandrevia africana Cooper. Oceanol Acta. 1987, 10: 445-454.
Südkamp W: Discovery of soft parts of a fossil brachiopod in the “Hunsrückschiefer” (Lower Devonian, Germany). Paläontol Z. 1997, 71: 91-95. 10.1007/BF03022550.
Hagadorn JW: Imaging of pyritized soft tissues in Paleozoic Konservatlagerstätten. GSA Ann Meet. 2001, 33 (1770): s430-s431.
Pakhnevich AV: The Use of a Tomograph for the Analysis of Brachiopods. Modern Paleontology: Classical and New Methods: 3rd AllRussia Scientific School for Young Scientists–Paleontologists. 2006, Paleontological Institute RAS, Moscow, (Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2006):48–50 [in Russian]
Pakhnevich AV: Microtomography of Paleontological Objects: Advantages and Problems. Modern Paleontology: Classical and New Methods: 5th AllRussia Scientific School for Young Scientists–Paleontologists. 2008, Borissiak Paleontological Institute RAS, Moscow, (Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2008):40–41 [in Russian]
Pakhnevich AV: Study of fossil and recent brachiopods, using a skyscan 1172 X-ray microtomograph. Paleontol J. 2010, 44: 1217-1230. 10.1134/S0031030110090066.
Pakhnevich AV: The type specimens of the Holocene brachiopod Diestothyris frontalis (Middendorf, 1849). In Brachiopods: extant and extinct. Proceedings of the Sixth International Brachiopod Congress. Edited by Shi GR, Weldon EA, Percival IG, Pierson RR, Laurie JR: Mem Assoc Australas Palaeontol; 2011, 41:269–272.
Błażejowski B, Binkowski M, Bitner MA, Gieszcz P: X − ray microtomography (XMT) of fossil brachiopod shell interiors for taxonomy. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2011, 56: 439-440. 10.4202/app.2010.0114.
Pérez-Huerta A, Cusack M, McDonald S, Marone F, Stampanoni M, MacKay S: Brachiopod punctae - A complexity in shell biomineralisation. J Struct Biol. 2009, 167: 62-67. 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.03.013.
Motchurova − Dekova N, Harper DAT: Synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) of brachiopod shell interiors for taxonomy: preliminary report. Annales Géologiques De La Péninsule Balkanique. 2010, 71: 109-117. 10.2298/GABP1071109M.
Logan A: Geographic distribution of extant articulated brachiopods. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part H: Brachiopoda, Revised, Volume 6. Edited by Selden PA. ᅟ. Boulder C, Lawrence K: The Geological Society of America and University of Kansas; 2007:3082–3115.
Harper EM: Discinisca stella (Gould, 1860): an intertidal inarticulate brachiopod from the Cape d’ Aguilar Marine Reserve, Hong Kong. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China IV. Proceedings of the Eighth International Marine Biological Workshop: the Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China. Edited by Morton B. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 1995:235–247.
Thayer CW: Brachiopods versus mussels: competition, predation, and palatability. Science. 1985, 228: 1527-1528. 10.1126/science.228.4707.1527.
Thayer CW, Allmon R: Unpalatable thecideid brachiopods from Palau: ecological and evolutionary implications. Brachiopods Through Time. Proceedings of the 2nd International Brachiopod Congress. Edited by: MacKinnon DI, Lee DE, Campbell JD. 1991, Balkema, Rotterdam, 253-260.
Witman JD, Cooper RA: Disturbance and contrasting patterns of population structure in the brachiopod Terebratulina septentrionalis (Couthouy) from two subtidal habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1983, 73: 57-79. 10.1016/0022-0981(83)90005-9.
Harper EM: What do we really know about predation on modern rhynchonelliforms? In Brachiopods: extant and extinct. Proceedings of the Sixth International Brachiopod Congress. Edited by Shi GR, Weldon EA, Percival IG, Pierson RR, Laurie JR ᅟ. ᅟ: Mem Assoc Australas Palaeontol; 2011, 41:45–57.
Alexander RR: Mechanical strength of shells of selected extant articulated brachiopods: implications for Paleozoic morphologic trends. Hist Biol. 1990, 3: 169-188. 10.1080/08912969009386520.
Peck L: The tissues of articulate brachiopods and their value to predators. Philos TransR Soc Lond. 1993, 39: 17-32. 10.1098/rstb.1993.0002.
Fouke BW: The functional significance of spicule-reinforced connective tissues in Terebratulina unguicula (Carpenter). In Les Brachiopodes fossiles et actuels. Actes du 1er Congres international sur les brachiopodes, Biostratigraphie du Paléozoique, Volume 4. Edited by Racheboeuf PR, Emig CC. Brest: Université de Bretagne Occidentale; 1986:271–279.