Hướng đến 'con người' và 'vật chất' có liên quan đến sự kết nối với thiên nhiên trong một mẫu đại diện của dân số trưởng thành Pháp

Abson DJ, Fischer J, Leventon J et al (2017) Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 Baglin J (2014) Improving your exploratory factor analysis for ordinal data: a demonstration using FACTOR. Pract Assess Res Eval. https://doi.org/10.7275/dsep-4220 Bairaktarova DN, Pilotte MK (2020) Person or thing oriented: a comparative study of individual differences of first-year engineering students and practitioners. J Eng Educ 109:230–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20309 Balundė A, Jovarauskaitė L, Poškus MS (2019) Exploring the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841925 Baudry E, ELIPSS Team [authors] L’intérêt pour la nature dans un contexte d’urbanisation (2019) [electronic file]. Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques (FNSP) [producer], Centre de Données Socio-Politiques (CDSP) [distributor] Baur JWRR, Ries P, Rosenberger RS (2020) A relationship between emotional connection to nature and attitudes about urban forest management. Urban Ecosyst 23:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00905-2 Boulbry G, Dupré M, Ferreira E, ELIPSS team [authors] Étude des facteurs de gaspillage selon le modèle du comportement planifié (2016) [electronic file]. Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques (FNSP) [producer], Centre de Données Socio-Politiques (CDSP) [distributor] Branch SE, Woodcock A, Graziano WG (2015) Person orientation and encouragement: predicting interest in engineering research. J Eng Educ 104:119–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20068 Brieger SA (2018) Social identity and environmental concern: the importance of contextual effects. Environ Behav 51:828–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518756988 Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K et al (2016) Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113 Clayton S (2003) Environmental identity: a conceptual and operational definition. In: Susan C, Opotow S (eds) Identity and the natural environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 45–65 Clayton S (2008) Attending to identities: ideology, group memberships, and perceptions of justice. Justice. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 241–266 Clayton SD (2012) Environment and identity. The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Oxford University, Oxford, pp 164–180 Clayton S, Kilinç A (2014) Proenvironmental concern and behavior in Turkey: the role of national and environmental identity. PsyEcology 4:311–330. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119713807749850 Clayton S, Irkhin BD, Nartova-Bochaver SK (2019) Environmental identity in Russia: validation and relationship to the concern for people and plants. Psychol J High Sch Econ 16:85–107. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-1-85-107 Colléony A, White R, Shwartz A (2019) The influence of spending time outside on experience of nature and environmental attitudes. Landsc Urban Plan 187:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.010 Colléony A, Cohen-Seffer R, Shwartz A (2020) Unpacking the causes and consequences of the extinction of experience. Biol Conserv 251:108788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108788 de Groot JIM, Steg L (2008) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav 40:330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831 Descola P (2015) Par-delà nature et culture. Gallimard, Paris Drechsler H, Frost PJ, Barnowe JT, Israël C (1979) Specialization and values as inputs to decision-making of mining managers. Relations Ind 34:241–256 Edi Putra IGN, Astell-Burt T, Cliff DP et al (2020) The relationship between green space and prosocial behaviour among children and adolescents: a systematic review. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00859 Gana K, Broc G (2019) Structural equation modeling with lavaan. ISTE Ltd, London Geng L, Xu J, Ye L et al (2015) Connections with nature and environmental behaviors. PLoS ONE 10:e0127247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127247 Gifford R, Nilsson A (2014) Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int J Psychol 49:141–157 Goldy SP, Piff PK (2020) Toward a social ecology of prosociality: why, when, and where nature enhances social connection. Curr Opin Psychol 32:27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.016 Grace J (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Graziano WG, Habashi MM, Woodcock A (2011) Exploring and measuring differences in person-thing orientations. Pers Individ Dif 51:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.004 Graziano WG, Habashi MM, Evangelou D, Ngambeki I (2012) Orientations and motivations: Are you a “people person”, a “thing person”, or both? Motiv Emot 36:465–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9273-2 Green C, Kalvaitis D, Worster A (2016) Recontextualizing psychosocial development in young children: a model of environmental identity development. Environ Educ Res 22:1025–1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1072136 Hills AM (1989) Relationship between thing-person orientation and the perception. Anthrozoos 3:100–110. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279390787057667 Hoyle R (1995) Structural equation modeling—concepts, issues, and applications. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Ignatow G (2006) Cultural models of nature and society: reconsidering environmental attitudes and concern. Environ Behav 38:441–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505280791 IPBES (2019) IPBES Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Chapter 1. Assessing a planet in transformation: rationale and approach of the IPBES global assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES, Bonn Ives CD, Abson DJ, von Wehrden H et al (2018) Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustain Sci 13:1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0542-9 Joye Y, Bolderdijk JW (2015) An exploratory study into the effects of extraordinary nature on emotions, mood, and prosociality. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01577 Kalof L (2003) The human self and the animal other: exploring borderland identities. In: Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) Identity and the natural environment. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 161–178 Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 Katz-Gerro T, Greenspan I, Handy F, Lee HY (2017) The relationship between value types and environmental behaviour in four countries: Universalism, benevolence, conformity and biospheric values revisited. Environ Values 26:223–249. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X14847335385599 Kellert SR (2002) Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In: Kahn PH, Kellert SR (eds) Children and nature—psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 117–151 Kellert SR, Wilson EO (1993) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Pre, Washington D.C Kemper J, Brinkmeier M (2019) Person-thing-orientation and the choice of computer science courses in high school. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics). Springer, New York, pp 175–188 Kesebir S, Kesebir P (2017) A growing disconnection from nature is evident in cultural products selin. Perspect Psychol Sci 12(2):258–269 Kiesling FM, Manning CM (2010) How green is your thumb? Environmental gardening identity and ecological gardening practices. J Environ Psychol 30:315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.02.004 Klain SC, Olmsted P, Chan KMA, Satterfield T (2017) Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLoS ONE 12:e0183962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183962 Lee H (2019) Understanding ethical consumers through person/thing orientation approach. J Bus Ethics 158:637–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3661-9 Little BR (1972) Person-thing orientation: a provisional manual for the T-P scale Little BR (1976) Specialization and the varieties of environmental experience: empirical studies within the personality paradigm. In: Wapner S, Cohen SB, Kaplan B (eds) Experiencing the environment. Plenum Press, New-York, London, pp 81–116 Martin L, White MP, Hunt A et al (2020) Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. J Environ Psychol 68:101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389 Mayer FS, Frantz CMP (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol 24:503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 McIntyre MM, Graziano WG (2016) Seeing people, seeing things: individual differences in selective attention. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 42:1258–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653937 McIntyre MM, Graziano WG (2019) A snapshot of person and thing orientations: how individual differences in interest manifest in everyday life. Pers Individ Dif 136:160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.005 McIntyre MM, Gundlach JL, Graziano WG (2021) Liking guides learning: the role of interest in memory for STEM topics. Learn Individ Differ 85:101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101960 Muralidharan S, Sheehan K (2017) “Tax” and “Fee” frames in green advertisements: the influence of self-transcendence in reusable bag usage. J Promot Manag 23:851–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2017.1323260 Ng HKS, Hong YL, Chow TS, Leung ANM (2019) Nature does not always give you a helping hand: comparing the prosocial effects of nature at different resource and security levels. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 45:616–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218794625 Ngambeki IB, Magana AJ (2020) The effect of person and thing orientation on the experience of haptics. In: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Ngambeki I, Evangelou D, Graziano W (2011) Investigating the nature of thing orientation. In: Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011. Madrid Ngambeki I, Habashi MM, Evangelou D et al (2012) Using profiles of Person-Thing orientation to examine the underrepresentation of women in engineering in three cultural contexts. Int J Eng Educ 28:621–632 Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA (2009) The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ Behav 41:715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748 Olivos P, Aragonés J-I (2011) Psychometric properties of the Environmental Identity Scale (EID). Psyecology 2:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119711794394653 Olivos P, Clayton S (2017) Self, nature and well-being: sense of connectedness and environmental identity for quality of life. In: Fleury-Bahi G, Pol E, Navarro O (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research. International handbooks of quality-of-life, Springer. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham, pp 107–126 Olsen SO, Tuu HH (2021) The relationships between core values, food-specific future time perspective and sustainable food consumption. Sustain Prod Consum 26:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.019 Perrin JL, Benassi VA (2009) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of emotional connection to nature? J Environ Psychol 29:434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.003 Petersen E, Fiske AP, Schubert TW (2019) The role of social relational emotions for human-nature connectedness. Front Psychol 10:2759. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02759 Petev ID, Demoli Y, SVEN team, ELIPSS team [authors] Styles de vie et Environnement (2017) [electronic file]. Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques (FNSP) [producer], Centre de Données Socio-Politiques (CDSP) [distributor] Piff PK, Dietze P, Feinberg M et al (2015) Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 108:883–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018 Prévot A-C, Clayton S, Mathevet R (2016) The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: experience in nature matters. Environ Educ Res 24:263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456 R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing Raudsepp M (2001) Some socio-demographic and socio-psychological predictors of environmentalism. Trames 5:355–367 Restall B, Conrad E (2015) A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. J Environ Manage 159:264–278 Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical sem estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17:354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315 Riechers M, Balázsi Á, Abson DJ, Fischer J (2020) The influence of landscape change on multiple dimensions of human–nature connectedness. Ecol Soc 25:1–12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11651-250303 Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more Version 0.5–12 (BETA) Schleyer-Lindenmann A, Dauvier B, Ittner H, Piolat M (2014) Mesure des attitudes environnementales: analyse structurale d’une version fraçaise de la NEPS (Dunlap et al., 2000). Psychol Fr 61:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2014.07.002 Schultz PW (2000) Empathizing with nature: the effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental education. J Soc Issues 56:391–406 Schultz PW (2001) The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J Environ Psychol 21:327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227 Schultz PW (2002) Inclusion with nature: the psychology of human-nature relations. In: Schmuck P, Schultz WP (eds) Psycholgy of sustainable development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 61–78 Schultz PW, Tabanico J (2007) Self, identity, and the natural environment: exploring implicit connections with nature. J Appl Soc Psychol 37:1219–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x Schultz PW, Shriver C, Tabanico JJ, Khazian AM (2004) Implicit connections with nature. J Environ Psychol 24:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7 Schultz PW, Gouveia VV, Cameron LD et al (2005) Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. J Cross Cult Psychol 36:457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962 Soga M, Gaston KJ (2016) Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Front Ecol Environ 14:94–101 Soto CJ, John OP (2017) Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: the BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. J Res Pers 68:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004 Steiger JH (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 87:245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 Stern PC, Dietz T (1994) The value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues 50:65–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x Tam KP (2013) Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: similarities and differences. J Environ Psychol 34:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004 Truong MX, Bonnefoy B, Prévot AC (2020) About smells and nature: an exploratory study on the links between environmental identity, smell sensitivity, and sensory uses of natural spaces. Psyecology 11:7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1643987 Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS (2017) Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth 11:S80–S89 Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD et al (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7 van Buuren S (2015) Package “mice.” https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mice/mice.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2016 Whitburn J, Linklater W, Abrahamse W (2020) Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conserv Biol 34:180–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13381 White IR, Royston P, Wood AM (2011) Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 30:377–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067 Woodcock A, Graziano WG, Branch SE et al (2013) Person and thing orientations: psychological correlates and predictive utility. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 4:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612444320 Yang Y, Barth JM (2015) Gender differences in STEM undergraduates’ vocational interests: People-thing orientation and goal affordances. J Vocat Behav 91:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.007 Zelezny LC, Chua P-P, Aldrich C (2000) Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. J Soc Issues 56:443–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177 Zhang JW, Piff PK, Iyer R et al (2014) An occasion for unselfing: beautiful nature leads to prosociality. J Environ Psychol 37:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.008 Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker JN et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York Zylstra MJ, Knight AT, Esler KJ, Le Grange LLL (2014) Connectedness as a core conservation concern: an interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Sci Rev 2:119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3