Organizational learning ambidexterity and openness, as determinants of SMEs' innovation performance

European Journal of Innovation Management - Tập 24 Số 2 - Trang 414-438 - 2021
Hongyun Tian1, Courage Simon Kofi Dogbe1, Wisdom Wise Kwabla Pomegbe1, Sampson Ato Sarsah1, Charles Oduro Acheampong Otoo1
1School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

Tóm tắt

PurposeSMEs could achieve their innovation goals, either through exploitation, exploratory, or ambidextrous learning strategies. This study presents ambidexterity as a more effective and efficient strategy that offers superior innovation advantage to SMEs. We also present the role of openness in this relationship.Design/methodology/approachEmpirical analysis was based on 388 SMEs in Ghana. Various validity and reliability checks were conducted before the presentation of the actual analysis, which was conducted using Ordinary Least Squares approach, run using SPSS (v. 20).FindingsFindings indicate that although exploitative and exploratory learning strategies individually had a positive significant effect on SMEs' innovation performance, organizational learning ambidexterity was found to have a greater positive impact on innovation performance among SMEs. High levels of openness further boosted the effect of organizational learning ambidexterity on SMEs’ innovation performance.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was conducted without recourse to some specific factors that could influence organizational learning ambidexterity among SMEs. Future studies should thus pay particular attention to the determinants of organizational learning ambidexterity among SMEs.Practical implicationsInnovation performance is very critical for the sustainability of firms, and SMEs in particular. Management of SMEs must therefore seek to simultaneously adopt both learning strategies, as that gives firms greater advantage, compared to the adoption of only one strategy.Originality/valueThe study demonstrates that organizational learning ambidexterity had a superior effect on SMEs' innovation performance. High levels of openness further boosted the effect of organizational learning ambidexterity on SMEs' innovation performance.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2019, Lean management and innovation performance: evidence from international manufacturing companies, Management Research Review, 42, 239, 10.1108/MRR-10-2017-0363

2009, Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation, Organization Science, 20, 696, 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406

2005, Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation, Journal of Marketing, 69, 61, 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61

2007, Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China, Journal of International Marketing, 15, 1, 10.1509/jimk.15.2.1

2018, Abusive customer behaviour and frontline employee turnover intentions in the banking industry: the mediating role of employee satisfaction, Cogent Business and Management, 5, 1

1991, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 99, 10.1177/014920639101700108

2004, Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty and network partner selection, Organization Science, 15, 259, 10.1287/orsc.1040.0065

2003, Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review, 28, 238, 10.5465/amr.2003.9416096

2011, Open Collective Innovation, the Power of the Many over the Few

2013, Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy, Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 708, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.04.001

2014, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research

2014, Exploring open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 1, 135

2009, Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects, Organization Science, 20, 781, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0426

2012, Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms, European Management Journal, 30, 1, 10.1016/j.emj.2011.08.003

2011, Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes, Management Decision, 49, 1658, 10.1108/00251741111183816

2015, The inconvenient truth of the relationship between open innovation activities and innovation performance, Management Decision, 53, 625, 10.1108/MD-03-2014-0163

2018, Lean, green practices and process innovation: a model for green supply chain performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 206, 79, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.031

2003, The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property, California Management Review, 45, 33

Chesbrough, H. and Bogers, M. (2014), “Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation”, in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

2012, Complementarities and substitutabilities among knowledge sourcing strategies and their impact on firm performance, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 498, 10.17705/1jais.00303

2010, How open is innovation?, Research Policy, 39, 699, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013

2006, Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917, 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917

2018, Factors affecting the formation of copper international trade community: based on resource dependence and network theory, Resources Policy, 57, 167, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.03.002

2000, Dynamic capabilities: what are they?, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105

European Commission (2019), “Entrepreneurship and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)”, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes_en (accessed 10 June 2019).

2012, The process of value realization in asymmetric new venture development alliances: governing the transition from exploration to exploitation, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29, 508, 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.08.001

2016, Strategic intent, organizational environment and organizational learning mechanisms: a multiple-case study in the construction industry in Taiwan, Personnel Review, 45, 928, 10.1108/PR-11-2014-0266

1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104

2016, Common methods variance detection in business research, Journal of Business Research, 69, 3192, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008

2016, The combined effect of technological relatedness and knowledge utilization on explorative and exploitative invention performance post-M and A, European Journal of Innovation Management, 19, 167, 10.1108/EJIM-08-2014-0092

2002, A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review, Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development and Management Association, 19, 110, 10.1111/1540-5885.1920110

2003, The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versus exploitation in technologically oriented organizations, Decision Sciences, 34, 323, 10.1111/1540-5915.02407

1994, Transformative capacity: continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 365, 10.1002/smj.4250150504

2010, The future of open innovation, R&D Management, 40, 213, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x

2004, The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209, 10.2307/20159573

2005, Creativity and standardization: complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness?, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 521, 10.5465/amj.2005.17407916

1991, The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33, 114, 10.2307/41166664

1996, Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109, 10.1002/smj.4250171110

2019, Trading off learning and performance: exploration and exploitation at work, Human Resource Management Review, 29, 179, 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.06.001

2006, The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693, 10.5465/amj.2006.22083026

2005, When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1, 10.1002/smj.429

1970, Social Change in Complex Organizations

2010, Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed.

2017, Open and closed knowledge sourcing: their effect on innovation performance in small and medium enterprises, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117, 1166, 10.1108/IMDS-08-2016-0338

2019, Exploration-exploitation tradeoffs and information-knowledge gaps in self-regulated learning: implications for learner-controlled training and development, Human Resource Management Review, 29, 196, 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.07.004

2014, Exploratory behavior in active learning: a between-and within-person examination, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 98, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.06.005

2017, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach

2004, Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis, Organization Science, 15, 481, 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078

2006, Knowledge Management for Technological Innovation in Organizations: The Fusion Process for Creating Intellectual Capital

2011, Exploitation-and exploration-based innovations: the role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors, Technovation, 31, 203, 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.007

2014, Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units, Journal of Management, 40, 1899, 10.1177/0149206312445925

2009, Resource dependence theory: a review, Journal of Management, 35, 1404, 10.1177/0149206309343469

2003, A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizational learning, Organization Studies, 24, 95, 10.1177/0170840603024001684

2015, Exploitative learning in project teams: do cognitive capability and strategic orientations act as moderator variables?, International Journal of Project Management, 33, 760, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.004

2010, Scaling-Up SME Access to Financial Services in the Developing World, International Finance Corporation

2006, Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators, Management Science, 52, 1661, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576

2002, Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183, 10.2307/3069433

2012, Learning and innovation: exploitation and exploration trade-offs, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1189, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.006

2002, Determining the sample size in a clinical trial, Medical Journal of Australia, 177, 256, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04759.x

2010, The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 415, 10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002

2004, Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: the overlooked role of market orientation, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 219, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.001

2006, The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct, Academy of Management Review, 31, 833, 10.5465/amr.2006.22527456

2006, Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131, 10.1002/smj.507

2014, The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration, Research Policy, 43, 867, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004

2018, The double-edged effects of the corporate venture capital unit's structural autonomy on corporate investors' explorative and exploitative innovation, Journal of Business Research, 88, 141, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.049

2020, The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: an uneven affair, European Management Journal, 38, 121, 10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002

2004, Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 331, 10.1002/smj.379

1993, The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95, 10.1002/smj.4250141009

2016, A dynamic analysis of investment in process and product innovation with learning-by-doing, Economics Letters, 145, 104, 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.031

2013, Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance, Information and Management, 50, 304, 10.1016/j.im.2013.05.003

2001, Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114

2006, Manufacturing relations: an empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks, Organization Science, 17, 313, 10.1287/orsc.1060.0190

2017, Transactive knowledge from communities of practice to firms: an empirical investigation of innovative projects performance, European Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 291, 10.1108/EJIM-10-2016-0098

2006, Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration, Journal of management, 32, 646, 10.1177/0149206306290712

2012, Common method bias in marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies, Journal of Retailing, 88, 542, 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001

2018, How employees perceive organizational learning: construct validation of the 25-item short form of the strategic learning assessment map (SF-SLAM), Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 57, 10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0494

1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2, 71, 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

1973, On Learning to Plan and Planning to Learn: The Social Psychology of Changing toward Future Responsive Societal Learning

National Board for Small Scale Industries – NBSSI (1990), “Supporting micro and small scale enterprises”, A Handbook on Enterprise Development Part 1. NBSSI, Print Solutions, Accra.

2008, Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma, Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185, 10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002

2018, Supply chain organizational learning, exploration, exploitation, and firm performance: a creation-dispersion perspective, International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 70, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.025

2013, Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 324, 10.5465/amp.2013.0025

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development – OECD (2017), “Meeting of the OECD council at ministerial level: enhancing the contributions of SMEs in a global and digitalised economy”, available at: https://www.oecd.org/mcm/documents/C-MIN-2017-8-EN.pdf (accessed 10 June 2019).

2016, Dynamic optimal control of process–product innovation with learning by doing, European Journal of Operational Research, 248, 136, 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.007

2019, The interplay of strategic and internal green marketing orientation on competitive advantage, Journal of Business Research, 104, 632, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.009

2014, MNC subsidiary size and expatriate control: resource-dependence and learning perspectives, Journal of World Business, 49, 51, 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.11.001

1987, A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations, Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business, 1, 25

1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective

2017, Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: an empirical study in SMEs, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014

2019, Boon or curse? A contingent view on the relationship between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity, Long Range Planning, 101878

2008, Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators, Journal of Management, 34, 375, 10.1177/0149206308316058

2016, Growing new corporate businesses: from initiation to graduation, Organization Science, 27, 1237, 10.1287/orsc.2016.1081

2009, Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance, Organization Science, 20, 685, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0428

Rogers, E.M. (1995), “Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications”, Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 25-38.

2013, Externalities of openness in innovation, Research Policy, 42, 1544, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.006

2004, Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201, 10.1002/smj.376

2018, How SMEs engage in open innovation: a survey, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 561, 10.1007/s13132-015-0350-8

2009, Research Methods for Business Students, 5th ed.

2007, The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation, Organization Science, 18, 20, 10.1287/orsc.1060.0212

2009, Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding, Journal of Management Studies, 46, 597, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x

2018, Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 824, 10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448

2017, Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation, Research Policy, 46, 784, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003

2010, Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research, Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 199, 10.1509/jmkr.47.2.199

1972, Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow‐Crowne social desirability scale, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191, 10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::AID-JCLP2270280220>3.0.CO;2-G

2014, The relationship between exploration and exploitation strategies, manufacturing flexibility and organizational learning: an empirical comparison between Non-ISO and ISO certified firms, European Journal of Operational Research, 232, 72, 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.040

2007, A comparison of transaction cost, agency, and knowledge-based predictors of IT outsourcing decisions: a US-Japan cross-cultural field study, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 259, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240108

2005, Research Methods: The Concise Knowledge Base

2008, Exploratory learning and new product performance: the moderating role of cognitive skills and environmental uncertainty, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19, 83, 10.1016/j.hitech.2008.10.001

2013, Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: a review and research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 317, 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x

1996, Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, California Management Review, 38, 8, 10.2307/41165852

Usman, M., Roijakkers, N., Vanhaverbeke, W. and Frattini, F. (2018), “A systematic review of the literature on open innovation in SMEs. Researching Open Innovation in SMEs”, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wim_Vanhaverbeke/publication/323128336_A_Systematic_Review_of_the_Literature_on_Open_Innovation_in_SMEs/links/5a937405a6fdccecff05a313/A-Systematic-Review-of-the-Literature-on-Open-Innovation-in-SMEs.pdf (accessed 12 January 2019).

2017, Managing Open Innovation in SMEs

2004, Non‐additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: a real options‐based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1045, 10.1002/smj.414

2013, Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains, Organization Science, 24, 1459, 10.1287/orsc.1120.0790

2014, Building exploration and exploitation in the high-tech industry: the role of relationship learning, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 331, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.008

2018, Examining the linkage among open innovation, customer knowledge management and radical innovation: the multiple mediating effects of organizational learning ability, Baltic Journal of Management, 13, 368, 10.1108/BJM-04-2017-0108

2016, Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: the role of host-country institutional development, Journal of World Business, 51, 251, 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.09.002

2018, Alliance formation in the midst of market and network: insights from resource dependence and network perspectives, Journal of Management, 44, 1899, 10.1177/0149206316630379

2008, Industry determinants of the ‘merger versus alliance’ decision, Academy of Management Review, 33, 473, 10.5465/amr.2008.31193515

2002, Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27, 185, 10.5465/amr.2002.6587995

2002, Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 377, 10.1002/smj.229

2001, The control design and performance in international joint ventures: a dynamic evolution perspective, International Business Review, 10, 341, 10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00020-8