Organizational Characteristics as Predictors of Work Disability: A Prospective Study Among Sick Employees of For-Profit and Not-For-Profit Organizations
Tóm tắt
Introduction: This article reports a prospective study that focused on the influence of organizational structure and organizational culture on the outcome of sickness absence, return to work or work disability. Former studies of determinants of work disability hardly have given attention to organizational characteristics and, if so, not following a appropriate prospective design. Methods: The study population consisted of 455 employees of 45 for-profit and not-for-profit companies participating in the Maastricht Cohort Study on fatigue at work who were on sick leave for at least 6 weeks. Both independent variables which were type of company, size, centralization of decision making and organizational culture, and covariates, which were sex, age, educational level, fatigue, and chronic illness, were all measured before employees reported sick. The dependent variable outcome of the sickness absence, mainly return to work or work disability, was measured 15 months after reporting sick. Results: Multilevel logistic regression analysis, with organizational characteristics as level 2 independent variables and demographic and health characteristics as covariates, suggested that the type of company (for-profit/private or not-for-profit/public) is predictive of the outcome of sickness absence (crude OR = 2.21; CI: 1.16–4.20), but this may be partially due to a higher proportion of fatigued and chronically ill employees in not-for-profit companies (adjusted OR = 2.09; CI: 0.93–4.37). Findings about the role of some other organizational characteristics, like organizational culture, were inconclusive. Conclusions: Organizational characteristics should next to health characteristics be included in the models of studies which aim at predicting which sick employees are at risk for work disability. To prevent work disability not-for-profit companies might be stimulated to more active return-to-work policy by charging them with the costs of it.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Nijhuis F, Soeters J. Werk en ziekte. Een onderzoek naar afwezigheid wegens ziekte en arbeidsongeschiktheid bij 51 industriële en niet-industriële organisaties in Z-Limburg. [Work and sickness: a study of absence because of sickness and work disability at 51 industrial and non-industrial organizations in S-Limburg]. Maastricht: Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, 1983.
Broersen T, Klosse S, Knepper S, Vrooland V. Arbeidsongeschiktheid onder ambtenaren. Feiten, analyses, maatregelen. [Work Disability among civil servants. Facts, analyses, measures]. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken, 1991.
Schröer CAP. Ziekteverzuim wegens overspanning: een onderzoek naar de aard van overspanning, de hulpverlening en het verzuimbeloop. [Sickness absence because of overstrain: A study of the nature, the care and the course of sickness]. Maastricht: UPM, 1993.
Schröer CAP, Janssen M, Amelsvoort LGPM van, Heuvel WPM van den, Swaen GMH, Nijhuis FJN, Eijk, J. van. Work characteristics, chronic illness and fatigue as predictors of return to work within fifteen months. Submitted.
Kirsh B. Organizational culture, climate and person-environment fit: relationships with employment outcomes for mental health consumers. Work 2000; 14: 109–122.
Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work 2001; 17: 11–22.
Rousseau D. Assessing organizational culture. In: Schneider B, ed. Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco/Oxford: Jossey Bass, 1990, pp. 153–192.
Schein, EH. What is culture? In: Frost PJ, Moore LF, Louis MR, Lundberg CC, Martin J, eds. Reframing organizational culture. Newbury Park: Sage 1991, pp. 243–253.
Glisson C, James LR. The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. J Organ Behav 2002; 23: 767–794.
Hofstede G. Attitudes, values and organizational culture: disentangling the concepts. Organ Stud 1998; 19: 477–492.
Hofstede G, Neuijen B, Daval Ohayv D, Sanders, G. Measuring organizational culture: A qualitative and quantitative study among twenty cases. Adm Sci Q 1990; 35: 286–316.
O’Reilly III CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad Manage J 1991; 34: 487–516.
Krause N, Frank, JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan, TJ, Sinclair, SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001; 40: 464–484.
Amick III BC, Habeck RV, Hunt A, Fossel AH, Chapin A, Keller RB, Katz, JN. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil 2000; 10: 21–38.
Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 277–295.
Dasinger LK, Krause N, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42: 323–333.
Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med 2001; 40: 374–392.
Infante-Rivard C, Lortie M. Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain. Occup Environ Med 53: 488–494.
Kant IJ, Bültmann U, Schröer KAP, Beurskens AJHM, Amelsvoort LGPM van, Swaen GMH. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: The Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: i32–i39.
Hall RH. Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1991.
Amelsvoort LGPM van, Kant IJ, Beurskens AJHM, Schröer CAP, Swaen GMH. Fatigue as a predictor of work disability. Occup Environ Med 2003; 59: 712–713.
Baanders AN, Rijken PM, Peters L. Labour participation of the chronically ill. A profile sketch. Eu J Public Health 2002; 12: 124–130.
Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, Meer JW van der, Bleijenberg G. Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 1994; 38: 383–392.
Bültmann U, Vries M de, Beurskens AJHM, Bleijenberg G, Vercoulen JHMM, Kant IJ. Measurement of prolonged fatigue in the working population: Determination of a cutoff point for the Checklist Individual Strength. J Occup Health Psychology 2000; 5: 411–416.
Beurskens AJHM, Bultmann U, Kant IJ, Vercoulen JH, Bleijenberg, G, Swaen, GM. Fatigue among working people: Validity of a questionnaire measure. Occup Environ Med 2000; 57: 353–357.
Vries J de, Michielsen HJ, Heck, GL van. Assessment of fatigue among working people: A comparison of six questionnaires. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: i10–i15.
Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold, 1995.
Woodhouse G. Multilevel modeling applications. A guide for users of users of MLn. London: Multilevel Model Project, Institute of Education, University of London, 1996.
Karasek RA Jr. Job demands, job decisions and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 1979; 24: 285–308.
Janssen N, Heuvel WPM van den, Beurskens AJHM, Nijhuis FJN, Schröer CAP, Eijk JTM van. The Demand-Control-Support model as a predictor of return to work. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26: 1–9.