Organisational change and the productivity effects of green technology adoption
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ackerberg, 2006
Ambec, 2013, The porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 7, 2, 10.1093/reep/res016
Antonioli, 2013, Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies, Res. Policy, 42, 975, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.005
Arora, 1996, Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: a note, Econ. Lett., 50, 51, 10.1016/0165-1765(95)00707-5
Arora, 2010, Complementarity and information technology adoption: local area networks, Inf. Econ. Policy, 22, 228, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.10.005
Arora, 1995, Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 28, 289, 10.1016/0167-2681(95)00037-2
Arora, 1990, Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology, J. Ind. Econ., 38, 361, 10.2307/2098345
Athey, 1998
Atkeson, 1999, Models of energy use: putty–putty versus putty–clay, Am. Econ. Rev., 89, 1028, 10.1257/aer.89.4.1028
BASF. Company website: http://www.basf.com/group/corporate/en/sustainability/environment/efficient-processes (accessed: July 2014).
Berman, 2001, Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries, Rev. Econ. Stat., 83, 498, 10.1162/00346530152480144
Bloom, 2010, Modern management: good for the environment or just hot air?, Econ. J., 120, 551, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02351.x
Bloom, 2012, Americans do I.T. better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 167, 10.1257/aer.102.1.167
Bloom, 2002, Patents, real options and firm performance, Econ. J., 112, 97, 10.1111/1468-0297.00022
Bloom, 2007, Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries, Q. J. Econ., 122, 1351, 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351
Blundell, 2000, GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions, Econom. Rev., 19, 321, 10.1080/07474930008800475
Boyd, 1999, The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 38, 121, 10.1006/jeem.1999.1082
Bresnahan, 2002, Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence, Q. J. Econ., 117, 339, 10.1162/003355302753399526
Caroli, 2001, Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments, Q. J. Econ., 116, 1449, 10.1162/003355301753265624
Commins, 2011, Climate policy & corporate behavior, Energy J., 32, 51, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No4-4
Gentzkow, 2007, Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: online newspapers, Am. Econ. Rev., 97, 713, 10.1257/aer.97.3.713
Gray, 1987, The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown, Am. Econ. Rev., 77, 998
Gray, 1998, Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice, J. Ind. Econ., 46, 235, 10.1111/1467-6451.00070
Gray, 2003, Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 46, 384, 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00031-7
Griffith, 2014, Employment protection legislation, multinational firms, and innovation, Rev. Econ. Stat., 96, 135, 10.1162/REST_a_00348
Griliches, 1984, Productivity and R&D at the firm level
Holmstrom, 1994, The firm as an incentive system, Am. Econ. Rev., 84, 972
Horbach, 2008, Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources, Res. Policy, 37, 163, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
Hottenrott, 2015, Policy-induced environmental technology and inventive efforts: is there a crowding out?, Ind. Innov., 22, 375, 10.1080/13662716.2015.1064255
Ichniowski, 1997, The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: a study of steel finishing lines, Am. Econ. Rev., 87, 291
Jaffe, 2002, Environmental policy and technological change, Environ. Resour. Econ., 22, 41, 10.1023/A:1015519401088
Javorcik, 2004, Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages, Am. Econ. Rev., 94, 605, 10.1257/0002828041464605
Johnstone, 2010, Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts, Environ. Resour. Econ., 45, 133, 10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
Kerr, 2003, Policy-induced technology adoption: evidence from the U.S. lead phasedown, J. Ind. Econ., 51, 317, 10.1111/1467-6451.00203
Konar, 2001, Does the market value environmental performance?, Rev. Econ. Stat., 83, 281, 10.1162/00346530151143815
Kretschmer, 2012, Competitive pressure and the adoption of complementary innovations, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 1540, 10.1257/aer.102.4.1540
Levinsohn, 2003, Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables, Rev. Econ. Stud., 70, 317, 10.1111/1467-937X.00246
Lileeva, 2010, Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity…for some plants, Q. J. Econ., 125, 1051, 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1051
Marshak, 1944, Random simultaneous equations and the theory of production, Econometrica, 12, 143, 10.2307/1905432
Martin, 2012, Anatomy of a paradox: management practices, organizational structure and energy efficiency, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 63, 208, 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.08.003
Milgrom, 1990, The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization, Am. Econ. Rev., 80, 511
Milgrom, 1995, Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing, J. Account. Econ., 19, 179, 10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F
Miravete, 2006, Innovation complementarity and scale production, J. Ind. Econ., 54, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2006.00273.x
Miravete, 2010, Testing for complementarity when strategies are dichotomous, Econ. Lett., 106, 28, 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.09.016
Olley, 1996, The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunication equipment industry, Econometrica, 64, 1263, 10.2307/2171831
Palmer, 1995, Tightening environmental standards: the benefits-cost or no-cost paradigm?, J. Econ. Perspect., 9, 119, 10.1257/jep.9.4.119
Pakes, 1994, Dynamic structural models, problems and prospects. Part II: Mixed continuous-discrete control problems, and market interactions
Popp, 2010, Energy, the environment, and technological change, 873, 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02005-8
Porter, 1991, America's green strategy, Sci. Am., 264, 168, 10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168
Porter, 1995, Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, J. Econ. Perspect., 9, 97, 10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Rexhäuser, 2014, Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the porter hypothesis, Environ. Resour. Econ., 57, 145, 10.1007/s10640-013-9671-x
Shadbegian, 2005, Pollution abatement expenditures and plant-level productivity: a production function approach, Ecol. Econ., 54, 196, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.029
Snyder, 2003, The effects of environmental regulation on technology diffusion: the case of chlorine manufacturing, Am. Econ. Rev., 93, 431, 10.1257/000282803321947470
Staiger, 1997, Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments, Econometrica, 65, 557, 10.2307/2171753
Syverson, 2004, Product substitutability and productivity dispersion, Rev. Econ. Stat., 86, 534, 10.1162/003465304323031094
Veugelers, 2012, Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?, Res. Policy, 41, 1770, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.012
Wooldridge, 2009, On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables, Econ. Lett., 104, 112, 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.026
Yan Aw, 2008, R&D investments, exporting, and the evolution of firm productivity, Am. Econ. Rev., 98, 451, 10.1257/aer.98.2.451