Ordinary, Ambivalent and Defensive: Class Identities in the Northwest of England

Sociology - Tập 35 Số 4 - Trang 875-892 - 2001
Mike Savage1, Gaynor Bagnall2, Brian Longhurst3
1Department of Sociology Manchester University
2School of Education Community & Social Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University
3Institute for Social Research University of Salford

Tóm tắt

This paper uses data gathered from an ESRC funded research project on social networks, social capital and lifestyle to provide an account of contemporary class identities derived from 178 in-depth interviews carried out in the Manchester area between 1997 and 1999. We use this data to unpack the ambivalent nature of contemporary class identities. We argue that despite the diversity of the sample, a number of common elements characterize people's attitudes to class. People are more hesitant in placing themselves in classes than they are about talking class as a social and political issue. Most people wish to see themselves as `outside' classes. Even so, class is a marker by which people relate their life histories, and most people are aware of class terminology. The major division in our sample is between those with the cultural capital to play reflexively with ideas of class, and those who lack these resources and feel threatened by the implications of relating class to their own personal identities. This latter group are mainly concerned to establish their own `ordinariness', which we read as a defensive device to avoid the politics of being labelled in class terms. Both middle-class and working-class identities can be used to establish ordinariness. We argue that sociologists should not assume that there is any necessary significance in how respondents define their class identity in surveys. We use these findings to take forward debates deriving from Bourdieu regarding class identity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abercrombie, N., The Dominant Ideology Thesis, 10.1007/978-1-349-16801-9_20

Bauman, Z., Memories of Class

Bauman, Z., Legislators and Interpreters, 10.4324/9780203414934-2

Beck, U., Risk Society

Bourdieu, P., Distinction

Bradley H., Gender and Power in the Workplace, 10.1007/978-1-349-27050-7

Breen, R., Class Stratification: A Comparative Perspective

10.2307/2096459

10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00008-9

Carrabine, E., 1999, New Formations, 38, 125

Crompton, R., Class and Stratification, 10.1007/978-1-349-27552-6_5

Crompton, R., Renewing Class Analysis

Devine, F., Affluent Workers Revisited

10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb00888.x

Devine, F., Social Class in Britain and America

Edgell, S., Class

10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036638

Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity

10.2307/591365

10.1177/0038038592026003002

Hindess, B., Politics and Class Analysis

Jenkins, R., Social Identity

Lash, S., The End of Organised Capitalism

Lash, S., Economies of Signs and Space

Lockwood, D., Economic Change and Social Stratification

Lockwood, D., Solidarity and Schism: The Problem of Disorder in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology, 10.1093/oso/9780198277170.001.0001

Longhurst, B., Ordinary Consumption

Marshall, G, Social Class in Modern Britain, 10.4324/9780203986172

Pahl, R., 1989, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13, 711, 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1989.tb00143.x

10.1016/0304-422X(92)90008-Q

10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00013-2

10.2307/2096460

10.1177/0038038598032002003

Reid, I., Social Class Differences in Britain

Reid, I., Class in Britain

Rutherford, J., Identity: Community, Culture, Difference

Saunders, P., 1989, Network, 44, 3

10.1111/j.1467-954X.1994.tb00100.x

Savage, M., Class Analysis and Social Transformation

Sayer, A., Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach

Sennett, R., The Hidden Injuries of Class

Skeggs, B., Formations of Class and Gender

10.1177/S0038038599000061

10.1017/CBO9780511488917