Oral cannabinoid for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 28 - Trang 2095-2103 - 2020
Ronald Chow1, Crystal Valdez1, Natalie Chow1, Daniel Zhang1, James Im1, Emily Sodhi1, Michael Lock1
1London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

Tóm tắt

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a burdensome adverse event frequently associated with chemotherapy treatment of cancer. Evidence suggests that cannabinoid CB2 receptors are present in brainstem neurons, and thus, there may exist a role for cannabinoids to counter CINV. The aim of this paper is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of oral cannabinoids compared with other treatments as documented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE up until December 31, 2018; Embase Classic and Embase up until 2018 week 53; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up until November 2018. Study data were extracted and included in this meta-analysis if they reported on at least one of the following efficacy endpoints: no nausea and no vomiting, no nausea, and no vomiting. The Mantel-Haenszel method and random effects analysis model were used, to generate odds ratio (OR) and accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the setting of prophylactic treatment against both nausea and vomiting, oral cannabinoid was more efficacious than placebo or other studied antiemetic treatments. When controlling for vomiting, oral cannabinoid was equally as efficacious as others. Against nausea, oral cannabinoid was equally as effective as other treatments. A greater percentage of patients administered oral cannabinoid for CINV experienced dysphoria, euphoria, and sedation. Although there exists some evidence suggesting that oral cannabinoids may have a role in controlling for emesis from a neurophysiological perspective, these conclusions are currently not mirrored in the published RCTs to date. However, there exists only a limited number of RCTs, comparisons with older treatment regimens and a lack of standard reporting practice across published literature. Further RCTs should investigate the efficacy and safety of oral cannabinoids, to secure a better picture of the efficacy of oral cannabinoids against CINV.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cohen L, de Moor CA, Eisenberg P et al (2007) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: incidence and impact on patient quality of life at community oncology settings. Support Care Cancer 15:491–503 Bloechl-Daum B, Deuson RR, Mavros P, Hansen M, Herrstedt J (2006) Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce patients’ quality of life after highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment. J Clin Oncol 24:4472–4478 Gralla RJ, de Wit R, Herrstedt J, Carides AD, Ianus J, Guoguang-Ma J, Evans JK, Horgan KJ (2005) Antiemetic efficacy of the neurokinin-1 antagonist, aprepitant, plus a 5-HT3 antagonist and a corticosteroid in patients receiving anthracyclines or cyclophosphamide in addition to high-dose cisplatin: analysis of combined data from two phase III randomized clinical trials. Cancer 104:864–868 Chow R, Chiu L, Navari R, Passik S, Chiu N, Popovic M, Lam H, Pasetka M, Chow E, DeAngelis C (2016) Efficacy and safety of olanzapine for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) as reported in phase I and phase II studies: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 24:1001–1008 Navari RM (2009) Antiemetic control: toward a new standard of care for emetogenic chemotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 10:629–644 Gyawali B, Poudyal B, Iddawela M (2016) Cheaper options in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Glob Oncol 3:145–153 Chow R, Warr DG, Navari RM et al (2016) Should palonosetron be a preferred 5-HT3 receptor antagonist for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 26:2519–2549 Di Maio M, Baratelli C, Bironzo P et al (2018) Efficacy of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 124:21–28 Chow R, Warr DG, Navari RM et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of 1-day versus 3-day dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hosp Manag Health Policy 2:25 Chiu L, Chow R, Popovic M, Navari RM, Shumway NM, Chiu N, Lam H, Milakovic M, Pasetka M, Vuong S, Chow E, DeAngelis C (2016) Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 24:2381–2392 Yoodee J, Permsuwan U, Nimworapan M (2017) Efficacy and safety of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 112:113–125 Sutherland A, Naessens K, Plugge E et al (2018) Olanzapine for the prevention and treatment of cancer-related nausea and vomiting in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD012555 Bymaster FP, Calligaro D, Falcone J, Marsh RD, Moore NA, Tye NC, Seeman P, Wong DT (1996) Radio-receptor binding profile of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. Neuropsychopharmacology 14:87–96 Van Sickle MD, Duncan M, Kingsley PJ et al (2005) Identification and functional characterization of brainstem cannabinoid CB2 receptors. Science 310:329–332 Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663 Navari RM, Gray SE, Kerr AC (2011) Olanzapine versus aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized phase III trial. J Support Oncol 9:188–195 Slatin MD (2007) Cannabinoids in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: beyond prevention of acute emesis. J Support Oncol 5(Suppl 3):1–9 Koeller JM, Aapro MS, Gralla RJ et al (2002) Antiemetic guidelines: creating a more practical treatment approach. Support Care Cancer 10:517–518 Chang AE, Shiling DJ, Stillman RC, Goldberg NH, Seipp CA, Barofsky I, Simon RM, Rosenberg SA (1979) Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol as an antiemetic in cancer patients receiving high-dose methotrexate. Ann Intern Med 91:819–824 Chang AE, Shiling DJ, Stilman RC et al (1981) A prospective evaluation of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol as an antiemetic in patients receiving Adriamycin and Cytoxan chemotherapy. Cancer 47:1746–1781 Cunningham D, Bradley CJ, Forrest GJ, Hutcheon AW, Adams L, Sneddon M, Harding M, Kerr DJ, Soukop M, Kaye SB (1988) A randomized trial of oral nabilone and prochlorperazine compared to intravenous metoclopramide and dexamethasone in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy regimens containing cisplatin or cisplatin analogues. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 24:685–689 Frytak S, Moertel CG, O’Fallon JR et al (1979) Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol as an antiemetic for patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med 91:825–830 Meiri E, Jhangiani H, Vredenburgh JJ, Barbato LM, Carter FJ, Yang HM, Baranowski V (2007) Efficacy of dronabinol alone and in combination with ondansetron versus ondansetron alone for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Curr Med Res Opin 23:533–543 Niederle N, Schutte J, Schmidt CG (1986) Crossover comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of nabilone and alizapride in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer receiving cisplatin therapy. Klin Wochenschr 64:362–365 Sallan SE, Zinberg NF, Frei E (1975) Antiemetic effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 293:795–797