Oral Clefts, Maternal Smoking, and TGFA: A Meta-Analysis of Gene-Environment Interaction

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal - Tập 42 Số 1 - Trang 58-63 - 2005
Joanna S. Zeiger1, Terri H. Beaty2, Kung‐Yee Liang2
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Tóm tắt

Objective A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association among maternal cigarette smoking, infant genotype at the Taq1 site in the transforming growth factor α (TGFA) locus, and risk of nonsyndromic oral clefts, both cleft palate (CP) and cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P). Design Five published case-control studies were included in the meta-analyis. Pooled Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Gene-environment interaction was also assessed by using the pooled data in a case-only analysis and polytomous logistic regression. Results Among nonsmoking mothers, there was no evidence of any increased risk for CP if the infant carried the TGFA Taq1 C2 allele. If the mother reported smoking, however, there was an overall increased risk for CP if the infant carried the C2 allele (ORsmokers = 1.95; 95% CI = 1.22 to 3.10). TGFA genotype did not increase risk to CL/P, regardless of maternal smoking status. Polytomous logistic regression revealed a significant overall smoking effect for CL/P (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.33 to 2.02) and CP (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.90). Conclusions While maternal smoking was a consistent risk factor for both CL/P and CP across all studies, the suggestive evidence for gene-environment interaction between the infant's genotype at the Taq1 marker in TGFA and maternal smoking was limited to CP. Furthermore, evidence for such gene-environment interaction was strongest in a case-control study drawn from a birth defect registry where infants with non-cleft defects served as controls.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ardinger H., 1989, Am J Hum Gen., 45, 348

10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00222-8

10.2307/2533446

10.1093/aje/153.10.1016

Chenevix-Trench G., 1992, Am J Hum Gen., 51, 1377

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009799

10.1097/00006534-200002000-00001

10.1016/0002-9378(79)90703-8

10.1002/gepi.10189

10.1002/sim.973

10.1136/jmg.29.6.390

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117478

10.1093/eurpub/11.3.329

10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0011_msaoc_2.3.co_2

10.2105/AJPH.77.5.623

10.1086/301956

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010071

10.1038/8773

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:3<231::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-8

10.1093/aje/153.10.1007

10.1080/791200704

10.1159/000299145

10.2105/AJPH.90.3.395

10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199901)59:1<39::AID-TERA9>3.0.CO;2-7

10.1002/ajmg.1320450508

Shaw G.M., 1996, Am J Hum Gen., 58, 551

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115735

10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0206_mcsaoc_2.3.co_2